OT If True & confirmed about saddam, congrats to you all
 

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 22:12:11 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 15:27:55 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

BTW, what evidence is there - I mean real evidence - that Osama was
responsible for 9-11? Yes, I know Osama has made some oblique
references, and so have his followers, but what irrefutable evidence is
there that we really, truly know what persons really are responsible for
9-11?

Good point. Perhaps Saddam was responsible for 9/11...and just used al
Qaeda mercernaries for cover.



And perhaps he was not. The previous deadly terrorist attack in the USA
was perpetrated by U.S. citizens. You do remember Oklahoma City, right?

Islamic terrorist groups seem quick to "take responsibility" for various
actions, and sometimes more than one group chimes in. The various
branches of the IRA used to do the same.

At some point we're going to need perpetrators and evidence that
satisfies civilian courts. "Military court" justice is an oxymoron.
Of course, the Bush-shippers just want to pretend they've caught the
real perps. That's one of the reasons we invaded Iraq in the absence of
real evidence.
What the hell do you know about military courts? Ever participated in a court
martial? Ever administered an Article 15? Ever conducted an Article 32
investigation? I didn't think so.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Am I supposed to assume "military justice" is any less an oxymoron than
"military intelligence?"

Assume what you will. Just don't pretend to have any knowledge of the subject.
Military intelligence put together the pieces to locate your buddy, Saddam. (My
son-in-law, currently in Baghdad, was on Channel 9 last night. He is a Military
Intelligence officer.)

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

OT If True & confirmed about saddam, congrats to you all
 

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 05:48:40 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

John Gaquin wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

Am I supposed to assume "military justice" is any less an oxymoron than
"military intelligence?"

You take great pleasure and self-satisfaction in denigrating and insulting
both the military and its dedicated members. The very self-same people who
protect and guarantee your right to be the obstreperous, petty little person
that you are. A sad case....


It's important to exercise what remaining Constitutional rights there
are before they are taken away by the Bush Administration, eh? And make
no mistake about it, they *are* being taken away by the Bush
Administration. Thanks to Bush and his pack of neoCons, we are being
becoming the kind of society we *used* to try to change, and devolving
into a police state.

It has *never* been my purpose or goal to change any of the mindless,
self-centered, selfish, lockstepped, right-wing opinion that sloshes
around this newsgroup.

Welcome to Amerika.

What rights have you lost, Harry? You, et al, have been making this
proclamation repeatedly. What rights have you, in fact, lost?

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

OT If True & confirmed about saddam, congrats to you all
 

JohnH wrote:

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:18:38 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JohnH wrote:


You have shown yourself to be devoid of credibility and integrity, Harry.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Because you found a site that shows deaths in Baghdad? What a giggle.
Keep looking, John.

What I found shows your statement to have been a lie.

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/bodycount.htm

No quibbling, no nothing, just a lie. As I said, you have shown yourself to be
devoid of integrity.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD


What you found was a website. There are many websites, and there is much
information simply not available on websites. In fact, generally
speaking, most good information is not available for free on websites.

--
Email sent to is never read.

OT If True & confirmed about saddam, congrats to you all
 

WaIIy wrote:

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:15:34 -0500, Charles
wrote:

Krause has *never* *ever* been about telling the truth. He's a
pathological liar.

-- Charlie

Yes and in certain areas he is a borderline sociopath.


Wally, you're not equipped mentally to find the expansion cracks in a
concrete sidewalk. Give it up, eh?



--
Email sent to is never read.

OT If True & confirmed about saddam, congrats to you all
 

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:58:45 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:18:38 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JohnH wrote:


You have shown yourself to be devoid of credibility and integrity, Harry.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Because you found a site that shows deaths in Baghdad? What a giggle.
Keep looking, John.

What I found shows your statement to have been a lie.

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/bodycount.htm

No quibbling, no nothing, just a lie. As I said, you have shown yourself to be
devoid of integrity.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD


What you found was a website. There are many websites, and there is much
information simply not available on websites. In fact, generally
speaking, most good information is not available for free on websites.


No quibbling, no nothing, just a lie. As I said, you have shown yourself to be
devoid of integrity.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

OT If True & confirmed about saddam, congrats to you all
 

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:13:54 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

WaIIy wrote:

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:15:34 -0500, Charles
wrote:

Krause has *never* *ever* been about telling the truth. He's a
pathological liar.

-- Charlie

Yes and in certain areas he is a borderline sociopath.


Wally, you're not equipped mentally to find the expansion cracks in a
concrete sidewalk. Give it up, eh?

No quibbling, no nothing, just a lie. As I said, you have shown yourself to be
devoid of integrity.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

OT If True & confirmed about saddam, congrats to you all
 

John,
It took you awhile to realize that, but most people who know Harry, knows he
has no integrity. He is as low as they get.


"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:13:54 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

WaIIy wrote:

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:15:34 -0500, Charles
wrote:

Krause has *never* *ever* been about telling the truth. He's a
pathological liar.

-- Charlie

Yes and in certain areas he is a borderline sociopath.


Wally, you're not equipped mentally to find the expansion cracks in a
concrete sidewalk. Give it up, eh?

No quibbling, no nothing, just a lie. As I said, you have shown yourself
to be
devoid of integrity.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

OT If True & confirmed about saddam, congrats to you all
 

JohnH wrote:

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:58:45 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:18:38 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JohnH wrote:


You have shown yourself to be devoid of credibility and integrity, Harry.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Because you found a site that shows deaths in Baghdad? What a giggle.
Keep looking, John.

What I found shows your statement to have been a lie.

http://www.iraqbodycount.net/bodycount.htm

No quibbling, no nothing, just a lie. As I said, you have shown yourself to be
devoid of integrity.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD


What you found was a website. There are many websites, and there is much
information simply not available on websites. In fact, generally
speaking, most good information is not available for free on websites.


No quibbling, no nothing, just a lie. As I said, you have shown yourself to be
devoid of integrity.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD


Pardon me while I yawn at your puerility, John. Oh, and in response to
some earlier post of yours, while I do have respect for individual
soldiers, I have no respect whatsoever for the *institution* of the
military. Eisenhower was spot-on. Be wary of the military and the
corporations who serve it and who the military serves. Unless particular
facts are blatantly obvious, one is better off not believing much of
anything "the military" says.





--
Email sent to is never read.

OT If True & confirmed about saddam, congrats to you all
 

Harry Krause wrote:

WaIIy wrote:

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:15:34 -0500, Charles
wrote:

Krause has *never* *ever* been about telling the truth. He's a
pathological liar.

-- Charlie

Yes and in certain areas he is a borderline sociopath.

Wally, you're not equipped mentally to find the expansion cracks in a
concrete sidewalk. Give it up, eh?


Expansion cracks in sidewalks are trivial in the real world krause. If
you can find them then that must be of significance to you in your
vicarious world.

What is significant is that you are a pathological liar who can no
longer distinguish truth from fiction. In your vicarious world, that's
'mentally equipped'.

-- Charlie


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

OT If True & confirmed about saddam, congrats to you all
 

Harry Krause wrote:


Oh, and in response to
some earlier post of yours, while I do have respect for individual
soldiers, I have no respect whatsoever for the *institution* of the
military. Eisenhower was spot-on. Be wary of the military and the
corporations who serve it and who the military serves. Unless particular
facts are blatantly obvious, one is better off not believing much of
anything "the military" says.

Pure horse****.

You've done nothing but repeatedly denigrate the individuals who serve
and have served to keep your freedom so you can continue to spout your
horse****. In reality, you despise them because you never did and never
will have the courage and self-sacrifice they each have.

You're a coward who sits behind a keyboard and endlessly
self-aggrandizes with lies and deceit, congratulating himself on each
sucker who falls for your crap.

-- Charlie


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

OT If True & confirmed about saddam, congrats to you all
 

"NOYB" wrote in message link.net...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


Duh. If WE were invaded by a sophisticated army, where would YOU
hide
weapons, Einstein? :-) In a big warehouse with the word "wEpinZ"
spray
painted on all four sides?

I believe it's against the Geneva Convention to hide them in
civilian
buildings.



So, in the scenario I described, you'd do what?

I'd surrender.

I guess even a POW camp needs dentists.

I'd probably get special privileges.

You sure would. You'd be the wife of the barracks!

OT If True & confirmed about saddam, congrats to you all
 

"NOYB" wrote in message news:NElDb.5323
I believe it's against the Geneva Convention to hide them in civilian
buildings.

Apparantly you republicans could care less about the Geneva
Convention, or any other war treaties.

OT If True & confirmed about saddam, congrats to you all
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:NElDb.5323
I believe it's against the Geneva Convention to hide them in civilian
buildings.

Apparantly you republicans could care less about the Geneva
Convention, or any other war treaties.

I believe that in a Disney kind of universe, police would never need to
rough up a suspect, all women would like sex in the morning as much as men
do, teenagers would insist on cleaning up their rooms before going out with
their friends, and plumbers wouldn't charge more than neurosurgeons. But,
I'm an adult. People sometimes hide things where they're not supposed to.