Harry Krause wrote in message ...
NOYB wrote:


It's not to "teach her a lesson". It's to protect the life of the infant.

Bull****.

If the pregnancy is past the first trimester, you've already stated that you
oppose the right to an abortion.


No, I didn't state that at all. This is why you (and you really are
brighter than most of the neoCons in here) conservatives get things
confused. You jump to conclusions from information not in play.

I am in favor of abortion on demand for all females during the first
trimester. After the first trimester, abortion should be available to
any female who requires one for any significant medical reason, and
significant includes the health of the mother or the fetus.


Yes, and you stated earlier that you would give the parents two hours
to get there and watch. So you are in favor of a dangerous medical
proceedure without any medical information being available to the
child. What if the child has a condition that would kill her in the
operation, are you sure that all these problems could be found in 2
hours while some poor parent without a car was clamoring for a ride to
the clinic? Two hours, **** they require more time to get a tatoo...
But again, keeping the rich old men from accountablilty is your only
concern.