Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JohnH" wrote in message ... On 01 Oct 2004 15:47:05 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote: Gould, I cringed watching Bush and could not believe Bush's poor performance. Once Kerry got on a roll after 15-20 min. he dominated the debate. No doubt. If the election were decided by last night's debate, the permanent population of Crawford would be going up a little. These debates could be disastrous for Bush. Folks who watched the first one and concluded, "well, anybody can have an off night," will have a harder time remaining enthusiastic behind Bush if he repeats his poor performance. For a guy who wants to be perceived as a courageous warrior, a Commander in Chief, he sure spent a lot of time running scared and acting confused last night. It's no secret that I want Kerry to replace Bush as POTUS, but I hate to see anybody so humiliated in front of an enormous audience. Talk about "encouraging our enemies", it isn't unreasonable to arrive at a conclusion that Bush is not the brightest star in the firmament after watching last night's debate. Maybe Bush will call off the next two debates "In the interest of national security." Really support our troops. Join "Soldiers for The Truth". http://www.sftt.org/ Come on, Chuck. Bush was *out talked*, not 'humiliated'. Let's don't get carried away here! that is all the liebrals can do, to gin up hype about kerry's 'victory' to mask the lack of substance to his positions. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who do binary and those who don't! |