On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:45:56 -0600, Messing In Boats wrote:
chickenhawks in our regime. Except for Colin Powell (and they don't even
listen to him) neither Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney or Wolfowitz did anything in
the service when they really had a chance to wear the green.

It could be argued that Rumsfeld is a chickenhawk, as he chose
ROTC at Princeton instead of Korea, but he did serve as a fighter pilot.

http://www.nhgazette.com/cgi-bin/NHG...20Chickenhawks

thunder wrote:

On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:45:56 -0600, Messing In Boats wrote:
chickenhawks in our regime. Except for Colin Powell (and they don't even
listen to him) neither Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney or Wolfowitz did anything in
the service when they really had a chance to wear the green.

It could be argued that Rumsfeld is a chickenhawk, as he chose
ROTC at Princeton instead of Korea, but he did serve as a fighter pilot.

http://www.nhgazette.com/cgi-bin/NHG...20Chickenhawks



Whatever...that's why it is so absurd when Bush plays toy soldier. As if
he has *any* understanding of the horrors of warmaking. Or anything else
except, maybe, Bud Lite.

--
Email sent to is never read.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:brf2et$2jjo4


Whatever...that's why it is so absurd when Bush plays toy soldier. As if
he has *any* understanding of the horrors of warmaking.


As you do, I'm sure, based on your experiences.

John Gaquin wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:brf2et$2jjo4


Whatever...that's why it is so absurd when Bush plays toy soldier. As if
he has *any* understanding of the horrors of warmaking.


As you do, I'm sure, based on your experiences.



As a matter of fact, I do. I know quite a bit, first-hand, about the
horrors of warmaking, and I didn't get that knowledge being bounced out
of bars in Texas while I was AWOL from the Air National Guard.

Bush is crap.

--
Email sent to is never read.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

As a matter of fact, I do. I know quite a bit, first-hand,

You've made such representations before, but when asked to clarify or
confirm, became ominously evasive. IIRC, the only substantive statement you
made was that you *...served your country in time of war...*, which, of
course, could mean a great deal or nothing. Unfortunately, your credibility
is not enhanced by such things.

John Gaquin wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message

As a matter of fact, I do. I know quite a bit, first-hand,

You've made such representations before, but when asked to clarify or
confirm, became ominously evasive. IIRC, the only substantive statement you
made was that you *...served your country in time of war...*, which, of
course, could mean a great deal or nothing. Unfortunately, your credibility
is not enhanced by such things.




I see no reason to go into gory details. I have previously stated I was
a civilian employee of the U.S. Government, I was in SE Asia during the
"Vietnam War," I saw some horrid sights directly related to that war and
no, I was NOT in the CIA. And just to help you along in your quest, I
worked for an Air Force general.



--
Email sent to is never read.

Harry Krause wrote:

I see no reason to go into gory details. I have previously stated I was
a civilian employee of the U.S. Government, I was in SE Asia during the
"Vietnam War," I saw some horrid sights directly related to that war and
no, I was NOT in the CIA. And just to help you along in your quest, I
worked for an Air Force general.


Here we go with the bull**** again.

Ya notice, never any direct information from this ass? Just a dribble of
"information" here and there, as he pieces together a lie.

-- Charlie


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---