Gould,
When I looked at the people at each convention, it was obvious that there
was a big difference in the crowd. The Republicans looked professional.
The democrats looked like the average Joe 6-Pack, many looked like they
didn't graduate from high school.

When they played the music between speakers, the Republicans looked stiff
and awkward trying to dance, the democrats were having a ball, dancing and
enjoying themselves.

If I wanted to go out and party, I would definitely want to go out with the
democratic crowd. If I needed some professional services, I would want the
Republican crowd.

It is obvious that the democrats go out of their way to appeal to stupid
people.



"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Gould,
Don't you hate it when a democrat looks so stupid. ; ) It looks like
stupid people are involved with both parties.

True enough. Which party goes out of its way to appeal to stupid people?

It is obvious that the democrats go out of their way to appeal to stupid
people.

Whether or not somebody can dance, (and I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt
here that you aren't making an underhanded comment about ther greater ethnic
diversity at one of the conventions), doesn't indicate squat about who the
party is trying to appeal to.

The people at the convention are already in the fold. I'm talking about
trolling for votes.

Take, for example, the almost worn out Republican attack on Kerry, "He voted
againts the F-14, he voted against the B-1, he voted against the missle defense
system, he voted against body armor for the troops, he voted against every
major weapon system used in the war on terror......."

Who is that directed at? Obviously it has to be the people who are too fricking
stupid or intellectually lazy to check the facts and discover the charges to be
major distortions, flirting with status of outright lies.

If your people are so bright, then shame on them twice. They should be able to
campaign based on reality, not have to stoop to lies, inuendo, and distortion.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
..... I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here that you aren't making an
underhanded comment about ther greater ethnic diversity at one of the
conventions.

Gould,
The last thing on my mind was the ethnic diveristy. The democrats at the
convention looked like a fun crowd, who was really enjoying their big show,
but they looked like the average uneducated masses.

The advertisements and spin suring the campaign is designed to get votes
from independents and moderates in either party.

If Kerry was trying to appeal to the intellect of the voters, he would never
have made his 4 months in VN a center piece of his campaign or his
convention. He would have focused on his track record in the senate.

You have become so blinded by your passion for anyone but Bush, that you
fail to see the lies, inuendo and distortion of the Kerry Campaign.

This is Bush-Chenian logic at it's finest...

Taco Heaven wrote:
When I looked at the people at each convention, it was obvious that there
was a big difference in the crowd. The Republicans looked professional.
The democrats looked like the average Joe 6-Pack, many looked like they
didn't graduate from high school.

As defined how? Do people who did not graduate from high school "dress"
a certain way?


When they played the music between speakers, the Republicans looked stiff
and awkward trying to dance, the democrats were having a ball, dancing and
enjoying themselves.

It may be that the choice in music has something to do with that.


If I wanted to go out and party, I would definitely want to go out with the
democratic crowd. If I needed some professional services, I would want the
Republican crowd.

So, based on vague "looks" and choice of music/dancing ability, you feel
you "want" Republicans for "professional services." Like what, for example?


It is obvious that the democrats go out of their way to appeal to stupid
people.

It is obvious that you cannot write a proper & complete sentence in the
English language. Did you graduate from high school? Did you graduate
from school high?

To claim that your prejudices in "looks" and type of attire, and your
taste in music, justify claiming that 'democrats go out of their way to
appeal to stupid people' is really funny.

You're another undercover communist operative like Nobby, aren't you?

DSK

DSK,

I thought it was obvious, that I was using Gould's tactics of making a
statement and then running with it as if it was fact.

It is consistently shown that Republicans have a higher education level than
Democrats, since Doug and Gould did not want to accept these survey's, I
used the same type of "gut feel" logic that Gould and Doug were using.

Obviously, it was only obvious to me.


"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
This is Bush-Chenian logic at it's finest...

Taco Heaven wrote:
When I looked at the people at each convention, it was obvious that there
was a big difference in the crowd. The Republicans looked professional.
The democrats looked like the average Joe 6-Pack, many looked like they
didn't graduate from high school.

As defined how? Do people who did not graduate from high school "dress" a
certain way?


When they played the music between speakers, the Republicans looked stiff
and awkward trying to dance, the democrats were having a ball, dancing
and enjoying themselves.

It may be that the choice in music has something to do with that.


If I wanted to go out and party, I would definitely want to go out with
the democratic crowd. If I needed some professional services, I would
want the Republican crowd.

So, based on vague "looks" and choice of music/dancing ability, you feel
you "want" Republicans for "professional services." Like what, for
example?


It is obvious that the democrats go out of their way to appeal to stupid
people.

It is obvious that you cannot write a proper & complete sentence in the
English language. Did you graduate from high school? Did you graduate from
school high?

To claim that your prejudices in "looks" and type of attire, and your
taste in music, justify claiming that 'democrats go out of their way to
appeal to stupid people' is really funny.

You're another undercover communist operative like Nobby, aren't you?

DSK

Taco Heaven wrote:
I thought it was obvious, that I was using Gould's tactics of making a
statement and then running with it as if it was fact.

It is consistently shown that Republicans have a higher education level than
Democrats

No, actually it hasn't. It has been consistently asserted... by you.

Considering that most of the right wingers making public statements on
the issue consider that college campusses are the last bastion of
communism, I fail to see much support to your claim.

Obviously, it was only obvious to me.

I suggest you stop listening to the voices from your toaster.

DSK

According to the ANES survey conducted by the University of Michigan. The
ANES is not interested in either political party, they are just trying to
track long term political trends. I am using this source just because they
have conducted extensive surveys to try to understand US politics.

http://www.umich.edu/~nes/overview/overview.htm

About 36% of Republicans graduated from college while about 28% and 23% of
Independents and Democrats, respectively, graduated from college. About 59%
of Republicans made over $35,000 a year while only 50% and 35% of
Independents and Democrats, respectively, made over $35,000 a year.

Again, the ANES is not interested in either political party, they are just
trying to track long term political trends.

From the Diane Divers Blair Center for the Study of Southern Politics and
Society, which does not support either party and is only interested in
studying Southern Politics.

http://plsc.uark.edu/arkpoll/fall99/party/PAGE4.HTM

"Adherents to the two parties in Arkansas had different levels of education,
with the Republicans being more educated. Roughly, 23% of the Democrats and
21% of Independents possessed a college degree; 39% of Republicans had
graduated from college."

"The state's Republicans are also wealthier than their Democratic and
Independent counterparts. Almost half (47%) of the Republicans surveyed
stated they had a household income of over $35,000, while 37% of
Independents and just under a third (31%) of the Democrats had incomes over
$35,000."

These two college studies do not endorse either party, but are only
interested in tracking the demographics as it relates to US voters.





"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
Taco Heaven wrote:
I thought it was obvious, that I was using Gould's tactics of making a
statement and then running with it as if it was fact.

It is consistently shown that Republicans have a higher education level
than Democrats

No, actually it hasn't. It has been consistently asserted... by you.

Considering that most of the right wingers making public statements on the
issue consider that college campusses are the last bastion of communism, I
fail to see much support to your claim.

Obviously, it was only obvious to me.

I suggest you stop listening to the voices from your toaster.

DSK

"Taco Heaven" wrote in message news:w1_4d.16703$He1.9901@attbi_s01...

About 36% of Republicans graduated from college while about 28% and 23% of
Independents and Democrats, respectively, graduated from college. About 59%
of Republicans made over $35,000 a year while only 50% and 35% of
Independents and Democrats, respectively, made over $35,000 a year.



"The state's Republicans are also wealthier than their Democratic and
Independent counterparts. Almost half (47%) of the Republicans surveyed
stated they had a household income of over $35,000, while 37% of
Independents and just under a third (31%) of the Democrats had incomes over
$35,000."


You equate money with intelligence. I've met a lot of "rich" people,
of both parties, that are quite stupid. I've met a lot of "poor"
people that are quite smart. Look at Bush, I believe he's pretty rich
and then on the other hand he's also pretty stupid. Then there's the
"old" money thing. If your parents are rich, your way can be pretty
well paved, a fast track to wealth through schooling and contacts that
on your own might never have happened, you were just lucky and
happened to pop out of the right womb. Just like Bush. On his own he's
incompetent, his dad's money and friends got him out of the numerous
holes he's dug for himself. Wealth can also be accumulated through a
lack of ethics, in the business world the final litmus test seems to
be legality, not morality. Rich folks,and according to you more
Republicans than others, seem to me to lean towards the IGMFY state of
mind, I got mine, **** you.

Sam wrote:
"Taco Heaven" wrote in message news:w1_4d.16703$He1.9901@attbi_s01...

About 36% of Republicans graduated from college while about 28% and 23% of
Independents and Democrats, respectively, graduated from college. About 59%
of Republicans made over $35,000 a year while only 50% and 35% of
Independents and Democrats, respectively, made over $35,000 a year.



"The state's Republicans are also wealthier than their Democratic and
Independent counterparts. Almost half (47%) of the Republicans surveyed
stated they had a household income of over $35,000, while 37% of
Independents and just under a third (31%) of the Democrats had incomes over
$35,000."


You equate money with intelligence. I've met a lot of "rich" people,
of both parties, that are quite stupid. I've met a lot of "poor"
people that are quite smart. Look at Bush, I believe he's pretty rich
and then on the other hand he's also pretty stupid. Then there's the
"old" money thing. If your parents are rich, your way can be pretty
well paved, a fast track to wealth through schooling and contacts that
on your own might never have happened, you were just lucky and
happened to pop out of the right womb. Just like Bush. On his own he's
incompetent, his dad's money and friends got him out of the numerous
holes he's dug for himself. Wealth can also be accumulated through a
lack of ethics, in the business world the final litmus test seems to
be legality, not morality. Rich folks,and according to you more
Republicans than others, seem to me to lean towards the IGMFY state of
mind, I got mine, **** you.


I saw a very good $3 bill last week with a photo of Dickless Cheney on
the front and that expression on the back. Seems to fit perfectly.

--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody or Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either of
them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?