"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
But the documents weren't wrong; they were just forgeries. There is no
dispute about Bush being A.W.O.L.

OJ is innocent.

Has to be. Just ask the right wingers.

Since part of the evidence against him was proven to be fabricated, (Mark
Fuhrman, glove, etc) that means the entire case was bogus from the get-go.

You just argued yesterday that the Constitution protects against abusive
powers by the police...and that criminals whose rights are violated
shouldn't be prosecuted. Now you're telling me that OJ was really guilty?




Since the presence of a forged document to the contrary proves that Bush
*must*
have served honorably in the TANG, rather obviously OJ is innocent too.

I'm glad we agree!