Matt Lang wrote:
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
A couple of posters whose opinions I respect contacted me and suggested
I "went too far" in trying to suggest an "alternative" target area for
terrorist attacks.

You may recall my feeling is that those of us in the East have had our
share of terrorist attacks and that if the crazed Islamists feel the
need to do it to us again, they pick some other area of the country.

I hope it doesn't happen, but who knows, eh?

In any event, yesterday I suggested an alternative target area:
Crawford, Texas. I offered the easily available GPS coordinates for
Crawford (but certainly not for the Bush ranch, since I have no idea
where it is).

"Over the line," I was told.

Okay.

I withdraw that suggestion and those coordinates.

Here's a better set:

41.49770N x 82.00620W

Harry, I'm still unpacking boxes in the new house - haven't found the atlas
yet. What are those coordinates?


It is at the south shore of lake erie, close to the towns Lorain/Cleveland.

No clue otherwise ..

Matt


Hey! It's no fun playing geocache if you have all the answers!



--
We today have a president of the United States who looks like he is the
son of Howdy Doody and Alfred E. Newman, who isn't smarter than either
of them, who is arrogant about his ignorance, who is reckless and
incompetent, and whose backers are turning the United States into a pariah.

What, me worry?