Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mozilla is user-trainable, so the moving target isn't a problem. When it
misses one, you just mark it as spam, Mozilla gets retrained a little, and it gets dropped in the Junk folder. -- Chuck Tribolet http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/people/triblet Silicon Valley: STILL the best day job in the world. "Joe Parsons" wrote in message ... On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 07:35:59 -0800, "Chuck Tribolet" wrote: Harry, I don't know how you developed this list, but I suspect it was by compiling the From: tags in spam. Most of those are fake anyway, and there's nothing wrong with those ISPs anti-spam policy. A fairly simple solution to the spam problem is to install Mozilla and use the spam filter in its mail reader. It works quite well, especially after a little simple training: if it misses one (false negative) or marks something spam that isn't (false positive) one mouse click corrects both the immediate problem and retrains the filter. Because spam is such a moving target, no one approach is going to. Blacklists, filters and blackhole lists are all helpful, but no one approach will do the trick. I've been a mostly happy Mailwasher user for the last several months. Here are my spam stats for this past week: Filters: 8,739 RBL lists: 2,745 Blacklist: 1,524 My mail has been consistently 90% spam. Although Mailwasher either flags or deletes the mail from the server before I download it, there is still always the risk of false positives. I had Mailwasher delete spam without my intervention for about a week, but discovered I was losing legitimate mail. For me, that's the real outrage about spam. Joe Parsons |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Biggest Usenet SPAMMER Finally Identified!!! ----- IOlRvcv4Jk | General |