| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... JGK wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... This is a nice myth, but untrue. The only thing we didn't use in Korean and Vietnam...thermonuclear bombs. Harry, Im not talking about the weapons we used, rather the methods. We could not follow the VC into Cambodia, When we sent bombers into North Vietnam we couldn't bomb the harbor for fear of killing any Russians. There were way too many restrictions on the way we fought the war, not what we used to fight it. Take the Politicians and collateral damage out of the mix and watch what happens! A Fine is a Tax for Doing Wrong - A Tax is a Fine for Doing Well |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
JGK wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... JGK wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... This is a nice myth, but untrue. The only thing we didn't use in Korean and Vietnam...thermonuclear bombs. Harry, Im not talking about the weapons we used, rather the methods. We could not follow the VC into Cambodia, Oh, really? We "incurred" into Cambodia. When we sent bombers into North Vietnam we couldn't bomb the harbor for fear of killing any Russians. You think we lost to North Vietnam because it occasionally got some meager supplies? That's a giggle. There were way too many restrictions on the way we fought the war, not what we used to fight it. Take the Politicians and collateral damage out of the mix and watch what happens! Take the politicians out of the mix and we have a military dictatorship. -- Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal! And don't forget to pay your taxes so the rich don't have to! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Oh, really? We "incurred" into Cambodia. Only late in the war...and no airstrikes on VC strongholds there. You think we lost to North Vietnam because it occasionally got some meager supplies? By meager supplies do you mean Russian SAM's but no thats not why we lost I think it was basically we interfered in a civil war, which we had no business going in the first place. When you can't trust the people you are supposedly fighting for you are in for big trouble. When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship. - Harry S Truman |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"JGK" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Oh, really? We "incurred" into Cambodia. Only late in the war...and no airstrikes on VC strongholds there. You think we lost to North Vietnam because it occasionally got some meager supplies? By meager supplies do you mean Russian SAM's but no thats not why we lost I think it was basically we interfered in a civil war, which we had no business going in the first place. When you can't trust the people you are supposedly fighting for you are in for big trouble. When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship. - Harry S Truman Hey genius...care to take a look at the name of this group? Never mind...goodbye forever. *ploink* -- -Netsock "It's just about going fast...that's all..." http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/ |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... JGK wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... JGK wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... This is a nice myth, but untrue. The only thing we didn't use in Korean and Vietnam...thermonuclear bombs. Harry, Im not talking about the weapons we used, rather the methods. We could not follow the VC into Cambodia, Oh, really? We "incurred" into Cambodia. Oops, we crossed the frontier, which wasn't marked with a big sign! When we sent bombers into North Vietnam we couldn't bomb the harbor for fear of killing any Russians. You think we lost to North Vietnam because it occasionally got some meager supplies? That's a giggle. Gee, I along with 99.99999999999% of the rest of the world were under the impression that the North Vietnamese were not capable of building Soviet radars and SAM's. There were way too many restrictions on the way we fought the war, not what we used to fight it. Take the Politicians and collateral damage out of the mix and watch what happens! Take the politicians out of the mix and we have a military dictatorship. Oh, isn't that why we have civillian leadership of the military? You can't take the politicians out of the military in the US of A. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Bwahaha! Bye Bye Bushy! | ASA | |||
| OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||