JGK wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Civilian Americans could not beat back a mob of screaming Shi'ite women.

Maybe only the ones you know! You should hang out with aq tougher crowd.,

The American military forces haven't won a war against a significant
enemy force since World War II, and were only able to do that because of
a huge coalition of countries that were actually involved. Those
countries included Canada.

The only reason for that. is all the wars since then have been fought with
the military's hands tied
behind their backs by the politicians. Let the Military fight to win like
they did in WWII and there
would be no questions who would win.



This is a nice myth, but untrue. The only thing we didn't use in Korean
and Vietnam...thermonuclear bombs. And in WW II, the only reason "we"
won is because "we" included a lot of allied countries.

We cannot win a major war against a significant enemy. We haven't done
it since WW II.


--
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
And don't forget to pay your taxes so the rich don't have to!

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JGK wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Civilian Americans could not beat back a mob of screaming Shi'ite
women.

Maybe only the ones you know! You should hang out with aq tougher
crowd.,

The American military forces haven't won a war against a significant
enemy force since World War II, and were only able to do that because
of
a huge coalition of countries that were actually involved. Those
countries included Canada.

The only reason for that. is all the wars since then have been fought
with
the military's hands tied
behind their backs by the politicians. Let the Military fight to win
like
they did in WWII and there
would be no questions who would win.



This is a nice myth, but untrue. The only thing we didn't use in Korean
and Vietnam...thermonuclear bombs. And in WW II, the only reason "we"
won is because "we" included a lot of allied countries.

Bull****, we had our hands tied in Korea and Vietnam by politcos in the
White House. Both administrations were Democratic.

We cannot win a major war against a significant enemy. We haven't done
it since WW II.

Bull**** again. We whooped the Soviets!

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JGK wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
This is a nice myth, but untrue. The only thing we didn't use in Korean
and Vietnam...thermonuclear bombs.

Harry, Im not talking about the weapons we used, rather the methods.
We could not follow the VC into Cambodia, When we sent bombers into
North Vietnam we couldn't bomb the harbor for fear of killing any Russians.
There were way too many restrictions on the way we fought the war, not
what we used to fight it.
Take the Politicians and collateral damage out of the mix and watch what
happens!

A Fine is a Tax for Doing Wrong - A Tax is a Fine for Doing Well

JGK wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JGK wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
This is a nice myth, but untrue. The only thing we didn't use in Korean
and Vietnam...thermonuclear bombs.

Harry, Im not talking about the weapons we used, rather the methods.
We could not follow the VC into Cambodia,

Oh, really? We "incurred" into Cambodia.


When we sent bombers into
North Vietnam we couldn't bomb the harbor for fear of killing any Russians.

You think we lost to North Vietnam because it occasionally got some
meager supplies?

That's a giggle.





There were way too many restrictions on the way we fought the war, not
what we used to fight it.
Take the Politicians and collateral damage out of the mix and watch what
happens!

Take the politicians out of the mix and we have a military dictatorship.


--
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
And don't forget to pay your taxes so the rich don't have to!

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Oh, really? We "incurred" into Cambodia.
Only late in the war...and no airstrikes on VC strongholds there.

You think we lost to North Vietnam because it occasionally got some
meager supplies?
By meager supplies do you mean Russian SAM's but no thats not why we lost
I think it was basically we interfered in a civil war, which we had no
business going
in the first place. When you can't trust the people you are supposedly
fighting for
you are in for big trouble.

When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship. - Harry S
Truman

"JGK" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Oh, really? We "incurred" into Cambodia.
Only late in the war...and no airstrikes on VC strongholds there.

You think we lost to North Vietnam because it occasionally got some
meager supplies?
By meager supplies do you mean Russian SAM's but no thats not why we lost
I think it was basically we interfered in a civil war, which we had no
business going
in the first place. When you can't trust the people you are supposedly
fighting for
you are in for big trouble.

When you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship. - Harry S
Truman

Hey genius...care to take a look at the name of this group?

Never mind...goodbye forever.

*ploink*

--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JGK wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JGK wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
This is a nice myth, but untrue. The only thing we didn't use in Korean
and Vietnam...thermonuclear bombs.

Harry, Im not talking about the weapons we used, rather the methods.
We could not follow the VC into Cambodia,

Oh, really? We "incurred" into Cambodia.

Oops, we crossed the frontier, which wasn't marked with a big sign!

When we sent bombers into
North Vietnam we couldn't bomb the harbor for fear of killing any
Russians.

You think we lost to North Vietnam because it occasionally got some
meager supplies?

That's a giggle.

Gee, I along with 99.99999999999% of the rest of the world were under the
impression that the North Vietnamese were not capable of building Soviet
radars and SAM's.


There were way too many restrictions on the way we fought the war, not
what we used to fight it.
Take the Politicians and collateral damage out of the mix and watch what
happens!

Take the politicians out of the mix and we have a military dictatorship.

Oh, isn't that why we have civillian leadership of the military? You can't
take the politicians out of the military in the US of A.