yes, of course. 260 nm south of Panama city is right smack dab centered in
the panhandle.

but wait a minute! I thought "close" only counted in horseshoes and H-bombs.

36.1 feet at 7:50PM, looks like wave height is peaking out at the
weather buoy(260 nm South of Panama City).

pardon me for not recalling **precisely** the minimum water depth to support
36
waves but I seem to recall it is about 150 feet.

Therefore, tsunamis are a figment of the imagination. The water is a couple of
inches deep at the edge of the beach. No waves should ever come ashore at all.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
pardon me for not recalling **precisely** the minimum water depth to
support
36
waves but I seem to recall it is about 150 feet.

Therefore, tsunamis are a figment of the imagination. The water is a
couple of
inches deep at the edge of the beach. No waves should ever come ashore at
all.

Dang, tell the Quicksilver people that Mavericks can never get 60' swells.
The reef is only 45' deep.

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
yes, of course. 260 nm south of Panama city is right smack dab centered
in
the panhandle.

but wait a minute! I thought "close" only counted in horseshoes and
H-bombs.

36.1 feet at 7:50PM, looks like wave height is peaking out at the
weather buoy(260 nm South of Panama City).



OK how about 64 miles.

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42040

This is 64 nm South of Dauphin Island, AL
Which is less than a 100 miles.

G Jax has never been to sea in any conditions above moderate, never
experienced hurricane conditiuons at sea, never seen seas heap up in shallow
water, etc.,etc ..... I wouldn't give his views too much credence.

Shen

Subject: 36 foot waves forecasted for Florida western panhandle, but
Saturday looks good.
From: "Calif Bill"

Dang, tell the Quicksilver people that Mavericks can never get 60' swells.
The reef is only 45' deep.

At this point, once again, the Emperor has been shown not to have any clothing.

And it's not a pretty sight.


Capt. Bill

Subject: 36 foot waves forecasted for Florida western panhandle
From: Gene Kearns

On 15 Sep 2004 02:41:05 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

non sequitor. look it up.


I don't have to, idiot...

First of all, I am clever enough to know that you probably mean, but
are too illiterate to spell, "non sequitur."

Second, your implication that "it does not follow" is simply
hilariously unsupported and demonstrably untrue. There is ample
scientific and lay information, proof, if you will, that waves in
excess of 36 feet hit the Gulf coast in 1969.

Why don't you look THAT up, dowf?

PS

I was in Mobile, AL a few days before Camille.... and one of the last
to view the beautiful seaside mansions and lighthouse The following
Friday I left Greensboro, NC for Washington, DC via airplane. I know
the carnage in the Gulf.... and I followed the effects of Camille
through NC, VA, and as far north as lower Maryland. I can speak from
personal experience.... you don't have a clue.... (or clew, as you,
the ignorant, spell (or is it spill)it.)

At this point, once again, the Emperor has been shown not to have any clothing.
And it's not a pretty sight.


Capt. Bill

Therefore, tsunamis are a figment of the imagination. The water is a couple
of
inches deep at the edge of the beach. No waves should ever come ashore at
all.

really? so those people in Hawaii died of sunburn?

bill, go away. you have more b/s stories than hoary.

Subject: 36 foot waves forecasted for Florida western panhandle, but
Saturday looks good.
From: (LaBomba182)
Date: 9/15/2004 10:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

Subject: 36 foot waves forecasted for Florida western panhandle, but
Saturday looks good.
From: "Calif Bill"

Dang, tell the Quicksilver people that Mavericks can never get 60' swells.
The reef is only 45' deep.

At this point, once again, the Emperor has been shown not to have any
clothing.

And it's not a pretty sight.


Capt. Bill