Anonymous Sender wrote:


Newsweek also reports that a hard-core group within the John Kerry
campaign is setting up a new "oppo" squad aimed at countering what they
perceive as Republican-backed smears against Kerry. Tentatively called
Sealords II-Kerry's Mekong Delta mission in Vietnam was known as Sealords
-- the group has a $1 million budget and will be housed at the Democratic
National Committee, where, one of its members says, the mission will be
"message, debate prep, attack, attack."

Figures, desperation from the left. What new lies can we expect from this
group?

(removed the cross posts from reply)

Your use of the word "smears" nullifies the question.
"What news can we expect from this group?" should have been the question.

The truth would have been the answer.

--
_______m___õ¿~___m_________________________
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office
of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability,
preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
- oath of office -
We need a president that understands, this is a promise.

A Discharge is evidence of completion of service. An Honorary Discharge is
evidence of honorable completion of service. No further evidence is needed.

double standard, double standard, double standard.

Why aren't Kerry's purple heats, and battlefield stars equally evident of
honorable service?

You guys spend $millions trying to refute the official records in Kerry's case,
but when your guy comes under the microscope you say "the official records
support Bush's story, so case closed."

You guys are so transparent, you'll all be reincarnated as storm windows. :-)

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
A Discharge is evidence of completion of service. An Honorary Discharge
is
evidence of honorable completion of service. No further evidence is
needed.

double standard, double standard, double standard.

Why aren't Kerry's purple heats, and battlefield stars equally evident of
honorable service?


They are and the President has said exactly that.


You guys spend $millions trying to refute the official records in Kerry's
case,
but when your guy comes under the microscope you say "the official records
support Bush's story, so case closed."

Who are *you guys*? Certainly not the President or his campaign.


You guys are so transparent, you'll all be reincarnated as storm windows.
:-)

More of this *you guys* stuff? Seems to me you paint with a pretty broad
brush Chucky.

On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 15:36:50 -0400, jim-- wrote:


Who are *you guys*? Certainly not the President or his campaign.

I'm not so sure.

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.pht...can_Connection

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 15:36:50 -0400, jim-- wrote:


Who are *you guys*? Certainly not the President or his campaign.

I'm not so sure.

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.pht...can_Connection

The President and his campaign staff had nothing to do with those
commercials and attacks. You know that.

On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:10:09 -0400, jim-- wrote:


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 15:36:50 -0400, jim-- wrote:


Who are *you guys*? Certainly not the President or his campaign.

I'm not so sure.

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.pht...can_Connection

The President and his campaign staff had nothing to do with those
commercials and attacks. You know that.

No, I don't. "Nothing" denotes absolute. Ginsburg precludes that. Also,
search on some of the names at the above disinfopedia link.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Aug25.html

Can I put the President or Karl Rove behind it? No, but I am quite
suspicious of Rove. You may find the source questionable, but the content
of this article is illuminating:

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/fre...0503_rove.html

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
A Discharge is evidence of completion of service. An Honorary Discharge
is
evidence of honorable completion of service. No further evidence is
needed.

double standard, double standard, double standard.

Why aren't Kerry's purple heats, and battlefield stars equally evident of
honorable service?

Because you can make an arguement that you were wounded during enemy action
when a mortar barage came at your camp while you were shaving and you nicked
yourself.

You guys spend $millions trying to refute the official records in Kerry's
case,
but when your guy comes under the microscope you say "the official records
support Bush's story, so case closed."

Ok, what about Kerry painting everyone in the military with a broad brush as
war criminals?

You guys are so transparent, you'll all be reincarnated as storm windows.
:-)

Kerry, is nothing more than an empty suite.

Ok, what about Kerry painting everyone in the military with a broad brush as
war criminals?


Restate that with some attempt to be accurate, rather than inflammatory, and it
may be worthy of discussion.

"TruthIsStrongerThanDeceit" wrote in message
news
Can you help provide the military records that prove Lt. George W. Bush
completed his military commitment?

Real or fake?

Or does it matter to you?

LOL!

"Jik Bombo" wrote in message
news:lm11d.45332$wu.43773@okepread04...

"TruthIsStrongerThanDeceit" wrote in message
news
Can you help provide the military records that prove Lt. George W. Bush
completed his military commitment?

Real or fake?

Or does it matter to you?

LOL!

It isn't up to me to provide Bush's records. It is a matter of record that
he they don't exist.


--
But some military experts disagreed with Bartlett's conclusion. Retired Army
Colonel Gerald A. Lechliter, who has studied Mr. Bush's records, told the
Globe, "He broke his contract with the United States government - without
any adverse consequences. And the Texas Air National Guard was complicit in
allowing this to happen."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...le642070.shtml


--
In May 1972, Bush moved to Alabama to work on a political campaign and, he
has said, to perform his Guard service there for a year. But other Guard
officers have said they have no recollection of ever seeing him there.

The documents released on Friday by the Pentagon included two faded
computerized payroll sheets showing Bush was not paid during the latter part
of 1972 and offer no evidence to place Bush in Alabama during the latter
part of 1972.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/....records.reut/


http://crisispapers.org/essays/awol-scandal.htm

http://glcq.com/

www.awolbush.com