In article ,
says...
Most of this of topic crap is from those of you who are sophistical
rhetoricians inebriated by the exuberance of your own verbosity and gifted
with an egotistical imagination that can at all times command an
inconsistent and interminable series of arguments to malign an opponent
glorify yourself.

Now **** off! With the OT bull****.

You'll find it more satisfying to contribute to the "Holding Tank
Location" if you're mostly attracted to ****.

There's any number of topics that're ****-related such as heads, toilet
paper, non-permeable hose, diverter valves, on-board treatment systems,
holding tanks, pumping out vs. porta potties. You might even be
intrigued with discussions about milDEW.

In any case, please don't let the OT **** bother you. It's just not
your cup of ****.

jps

jps,
This is getting to be some funny ****.
Paul

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
Most of this of topic crap is from those of you who are sophistical
rhetoricians inebriated by the exuberance of your own verbosity and
gifted
with an egotistical imagination that can at all times command an
inconsistent and interminable series of arguments to malign an opponent
glorify yourself.

Now **** off! With the OT bull****.

You'll find it more satisfying to contribute to the "Holding Tank
Location" if you're mostly attracted to ****.

There's any number of topics that're ****-related such as heads, toilet
paper, non-permeable hose, diverter valves, on-board treatment systems,
holding tanks, pumping out vs. porta potties. You might even be
intrigued with discussions about milDEW.

In any case, please don't let the OT **** bother you. It's just not
your cup of ****.

jps

In article , paulschilter@comcast
says...
jps,
This is getting to be some funny ****.
Paul

Thanks but I didn't nearly **** my pants or **** a pickle when I read it
back.

****, I could've written some better ****. Maybe if I smoke some **** I
can come up with some **** while taking a ****.

I'll bet George Carlin could come up with some great **** on this ****.

jps

jps wrote in message . ..
In article , paulschilter@comcast
says...
jps,
This is getting to be some funny ****.
Paul

Thanks but I didn't nearly **** my pants or **** a pickle when I read it
back.

****, I could've written some better ****. Maybe if I smoke some **** I
can come up with some **** while taking a ****.

I'll bet George Carlin could come up with some great **** on this ****.

jps
Holy ****, are you sure as ****?

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 23:42:09 GMT, "K W" wrote:

Most of this of topic crap is from those of you who are sophistical
rhetoricians inebriated by the exuberance of your own verbosity and gifted
with an egotistical imagination that can at all times command an
inconsistent and interminable series of arguments to malign an opponent
glorify yourself.

Now **** off! With the OT bull****.


You give far too much credit. Sophistical? Have you read any of Krause's stuff?

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Subject: I hear a bunch of **** being spoken here
From: "K W"

snip, tired, old, miss spelled, grammatical incorrect newbie rant


Now **** off! With the OT bull****.


Same to you.

Capt. Bill

Understand what he's saying .... 99% of what's in this NG, is OT, BS
answered by the same people in the same way.
Most of us just take a quick run through the post (for those who don't
use filters) and delete the typical junk responses by the same junk
responders, with an occasional read to see if those expected junk
responses are the expected BS we expect from the junk responders.
For anyone who's lurked here for any time, it's obvious which junk
responders, need never be checked, need occasional checking, or
frequent checking, on the off chance there may be something of value
that is On Topic.
Generally, the only way to get the OT topics over and done with, is to
ignore them, but for all lurkers, frustration sets in at some point, and
like this post, some need to occasionally vent.

G Personally, anyone who claims to be a proponent of a particular
political party .... is an idiot.
Anyone who claims their religion is the only true religion ... is an idiot.
Anyone who claims to be an expert ....is an idiot
Anyone dumb enough to get into serious arguments on 99% of the OT post
subjects, I see in here .... is an idiot ... this includes myself for
getting into this one, though normally I just respond to "on topic" stuff.
Now .... for all you who feel the need to respond, have at it! I've had
my say.

otn
LaBomba182 wrote:
Subject: I hear a bunch of **** being spoken here
From: "K W"


snip, tired, old, miss spelled, grammatical incorrect newbie rant



Now **** off! With the OT bull****.



Same to you.

Capt. Bill

thank you...
"otnmbrd" wrote in message
nk.net...
Understand what he's saying .... 99% of what's in this NG, is OT, BS
answered by the same people in the same way.
Most of us just take a quick run through the post (for those who don't
use filters) and delete the typical junk responses by the same junk
responders, with an occasional read to see if those expected junk
responses are the expected BS we expect from the junk responders.
For anyone who's lurked here for any time, it's obvious which junk
responders, need never be checked, need occasional checking, or
frequent checking, on the off chance there may be something of value
that is On Topic.
Generally, the only way to get the OT topics over and done with, is to
ignore them, but for all lurkers, frustration sets in at some point, and
like this post, some need to occasionally vent.

G Personally, anyone who claims to be a proponent of a particular
political party .... is an idiot.
Anyone who claims their religion is the only true religion ... is an
idiot.
Anyone who claims to be an expert ....is an idiot
Anyone dumb enough to get into serious arguments on 99% of the OT post
subjects, I see in here .... is an idiot ... this includes myself for
getting into this one, though normally I just respond to "on topic" stuff.
Now .... for all you who feel the need to respond, have at it! I've had
my say.

otn
LaBomba182 wrote:
Subject: I hear a bunch of **** being spoken here
From: "K W"


snip, tired, old, miss spelled, grammatical incorrect newbie rant



Now **** off! With the OT bull****.



Same to you.

Capt. Bill

On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 01:12:39 GMT, otnmbrd
wrote:

Understand what he's saying .... 99% of what's in this NG, is OT, BS
answered by the same people in the same way.
Most of us just take a quick run through the post (for those who don't
use filters) and delete the typical junk responses by the same junk
responders, with an occasional read to see if those expected junk
responses are the expected BS we expect from the junk responders.
For anyone who's lurked here for any time, it's obvious which junk
responders, need never be checked, need occasional checking, or
frequent checking, on the off chance there may be something of value
that is On Topic.
Generally, the only way to get the OT topics over and done with, is to
ignore them, but for all lurkers, frustration sets in at some point, and
like this post, some need to occasionally vent.

G Personally, anyone who claims to be a proponent of a particular
political party .... is an idiot.
Anyone who claims their religion is the only true religion ... is an idiot.
Anyone who claims to be an expert ....is an idiot
Anyone dumb enough to get into serious arguments on 99% of the OT post
subjects, I see in here .... is an idiot ... this includes myself for
getting into this one, though normally I just respond to "on topic" stuff.
Now .... for all you who feel the need to respond, have at it! I've had
my say.

otn

Damn! You should be Mayor! )
Regards,
noah

To email me, remove the "OT-" from wrecked.ot-boats.noah.
....as you were. )

otn,
I don't think you're an idiot for your post, but the rest of your post I
agree with. O.T. posts that are at least courteous and or humorous are okay
in my book.
Paul

"otnmbrd" wrote in message
nk.net...
deleted
G Personally, anyone who claims to be a proponent of a particular
political party .... is an idiot.
Anyone who claims their religion is the only true religion ... is an
idiot.
Anyone who claims to be an expert ....is an idiot
Anyone dumb enough to get into serious arguments on 99% of the OT post
subjects, I see in here .... is an idiot ... this includes myself for
getting into this one, though normally I just respond to "on topic" stuff.
Now .... for all you who feel the need to respond, have at it! I've had
my say.

otn