Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
thunder
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:09:46 +0000, Calif Bill wrote:


Look at Kerry's running mate as one of the reasons for soaring medical
costs. Someone has to pay the multi-million dollar costs of litigation.


Lawyers make easy targets, but they are a very small part of medical
costs. The Congressional Budget Office states that malpractice costs
account for less than 2% of health care spending.

http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/200...3/prsa0223.htm
  #2   Report Post  
jim--
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:09:46 +0000, Calif Bill wrote:


Look at Kerry's running mate as one of the reasons for soaring medical
costs. Someone has to pay the multi-million dollar costs of litigation.


Lawyers make easy targets, but they are a very small part of medical
costs. The Congressional Budget Office states that malpractice costs
account for less than 2% of health care spending.

http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/200...3/prsa0223.htm


That $24 billion comes right out of insurance company pockets. And the
trend is a rise in frequency and severity in the malpractice law suits and
awards. The insurance companies in turn raise their rates to the physicians
who in turn raise their rates.

The lawsuits certainly do have an impact on everyone.


  #3   Report Post  
Calif Bill
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:09:46 +0000, Calif Bill wrote:


Look at Kerry's running mate as one of the reasons for soaring medical
costs. Someone has to pay the multi-million dollar costs of litigation.


Lawyers make easy targets, but they are a very small part of medical
costs. The Congressional Budget Office states that malpractice costs
account for less than 2% of health care spending.

http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/200...3/prsa0223.htm


$24 billion is a lot of cash the insurance companies have to pay out. And
is probably only a mid percentage of the actual costs. The threat of suits
cost money also. The $24 billion also has a time value cost as well as the
direct cost. How many extra tests are required to cover the medical fields
butts in case of suit. Those tests are run every time. As my friends aunt,
used to like to ride in the ambulance, every time she had a pain, she had
the rest home send her to the hospital. The emergency room always did a
full array of tests, no matter that her complaint was a sore arm. These
also add to the $24 Billion. Big time addition. Most doctors are not
getting filthy rich like Union bosses (gratuitous dig), but are upper middle
class money. But after 10 years of school and residency, they should be
well paid. All this adds to the cost of medical care. Yes, drugs should
not cost anywhere as much as they do here. The drug companies can make a
profit in Canada and Mexico and Europe, just not the amount of margin made
in the USA. And the fact that most of the research was paid for by the US
taxpayer through university funding and the drug companies just take the
research the last few feet, should warrant lower prices to the US over other
countries. We should be able to recoup some of our research costs.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT Bush is certainly no Reagan basskisser General 0 June 8th 04 03:53 PM
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. NOYB General 23 February 6th 04 04:01 PM
O.T. A day at the airport. RGrew176 General 51 November 27th 03 04:32 PM
Can We STOP IT??? Bobsprit ASA 5 November 21st 03 11:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017