| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... He has a habit of doing that lately, especially when he is on the losing end of a discussion. He did the exact same think to me twice just today. I don't have to reprint your entire post to call "bull****" on a portion of it. Struck a nerve Chuck? Not at all. But I do understand that some statements look even more absurd when highlighted as the only item on the page, rather than surrounded by meaningless pap. When somebody posts a long batch of nonsense leading to a false conclusion, it is appropriate to refute the conclusion without having to repeat all the nonsense. Bull****. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ( OT ) Creepier than Nixon -- Worse than Watergate | General | |||
| OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||
Threaded Mode
