He has a habit of doing that lately, especially when he is on the losing end
of a discussion. He did the exact same think to me twice just today.



I don't have to reprint your entire post to call "bull****" on a portion of it.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
He has a habit of doing that lately, especially when he is on the losing
end
of a discussion. He did the exact same think to me twice just today.



I don't have to reprint your entire post to call "bull****" on a portion
of it.



Struck a nerve Chuck?

Struck a nerve Chuck?

Not at all. But I do understand that some statements look even more absurd
when highlighted as the only item on the page, rather than surrounded by
meaningless pap.

When somebody posts a long batch of nonsense leading to a false conclusion, it
is appropriate to refute the conclusion without having to repeat all the
nonsense.

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...

He has a habit of doing that lately, especially when he is on the
losing
end
of a discussion. He did the exact same think to me twice just today.

I don't have to reprint your entire post to call "bull****" on a portion
of it.

Struck a nerve Chuck?

Not at all. But I do understand that some statements look even more absurd
when highlighted as the only item on the page, rather than surrounded by
meaningless pap.

When somebody posts a long batch of nonsense leading to a false
conclusion, it
is appropriate to refute the conclusion without having to repeat all the
nonsense.

Bull****.

Bull****.

Convincing argument. :-)

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Bull****.

Convincing argument. :-)

Succinct and accurate. Something you should try.

Succinct and accurate. Something you should try.

If you find my style tedious or statements inaccurate, why are you compelled to
(attempt to) read and respond to nearly every one of my posts?