"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
Gould,
Don't you think the most prolific poster has set the tone for discussions
in
rec.boats?

I think we are each responsible for our own deportment. Calling names
because
"TMPP started it!" is not adult behavior.

That attitude is destroying the Democratic/Progressive party of yours. You
can keep saying that you would behave that way and that you feel that it is
wrong to judge your fellow party members but, it just proves that you are
unprincipled.

You normally discuss issues and not personalities, I like to believe that
most people even though who did not like Clinton's policies wish him no
ill
will.

And didn't I commend our right wing contingent for not jumping on the
"hope he
dies" band wagon? It isn't inconceivable that the same people who have
accused
Bill Clinton of murdering 18-20 people during his presidency would express
some
hope that he, himself, would now die.

What was your problem with his speech?

1. It contradicted statements he has made about John Kerry within the last
couple of years. Was he lying then, or lying now?

Was Kerry lying then, or is he lying now?

2. The accusations were not based on fact. He simply repeated the same
lies
that Kerry has cast specific votes against
all of those individual weapons programs.

http://slate.msn.com/id/2096127/

How about referencing the congressional record? It has a bit more integrity
than Slate, the mouth piece of the liberal/progressive elite.

3. It represents where our country is going.
If the founding fathers could have seen how their brave experiment in self
government was going to deteriorate into the polarized, hateful mess we
see
today, they would have saved us all a lot of bother and simply crowned
George
Washington king.

Just because the country is returning to its conservative roots doesn't mean
you have to whine and cry.