Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I use a 230cm two-piece with my Coho which is about a 23" beam. I'm
also 6'1". My girlfriend bought a 220cm paddle (she's 5'8") and prefers mine. I haven't the slightest idea what is "correct" though. I just know what is comfortable. I lose a lot of power when I try her 220cm paddle, but the paddles are different in more respects than just shaft-length. The try-before-you-buy method is always best but sometimes inconvenient. Most mail-order places will allow you to ship it back if you don't like it (no wear). Try a 230cm and replace it if you don't like it. Jake Anyway, it seems like my 230 Lendl is pretty nice, maybe a tad long. I have a 220 Streuer that I'm borrowing that seems short. But I really haven't been seakayak paddling that much. I'm 6'1" with 30-31" torso. My boat has a 20" beam---Seda Glider knockoff striper. Extremely cool, fast boat. I have a chance to buy a new 2-piece: 230 or 220: which length to go for? Much of what I read on paddles these days hints that 220 might be the ticket. Less fatigue, higher cadence. The shop rat showing me the paddles is my size, is pushing the 220, says that's what he uses. I'm a terrible shopper. I hate choices. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
Ignorant Dupes | ASA |