"Comcast News" wrote in message news:3BlXc.319665$%_6.241779@attbi_s01...
John,

Yes, Basskisser did say ... when someone makes a claim you (John) must
include proof in order for it to be valid.

I hope you are not too busy to keep up with it all.

You ARE stupid!!!!! Please show where I said that, will you?

"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"Comcast News" wrote in message news:3BlXc.319665$%

John,

Yes, Basskisser did say ... when someone makes a claim you (John) must
include proof in order for it to be valid.

I thought as much.

Then you thought wrong, dolt.

"Comcast News" wrote in message news:k4mXc.237634$eM2.191917@attbi_s51...
I am very glad you are not going to assume responsibility for proving every
claim anyone makes. It is too much responsibility for any one person. Now
if you could find 2 or 3 friends to help, I am sure you would be able to
validate all legitimate claims made by everyone in the world. ; )



This is too funny....John Smith!! After proving yourself a liar, you
are now proving yourself dumber and dumber.....

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message

Ah, so, is it your contention that, if someone makes a claim, in order
for it to be valid, you must include proof?

Excuse me, I'm trying to work through your sentence structure here. Does
the above mean that if someone makes a claim, I must include proof ?
That
could prove difficult. Or, does it mean that if someone makes a claim,
then
that person must include proof ?

As usual, you don't understand, and it leads to stupid question after
stupid question. John, if you honestly don't understand the above,
then you are too dumb to be involved in the thread.

Now, I'll ask one more time. Do YOU find it intelligent to get some
idea in your head, then post that allegation, or assumption AS FACT,
without any proof of those? Let's take an example, shall we? Because I
stated that my mother was an alcoholic, you and others automatically
got it in your ignorant minds that I have FAS, and stated that AS
FACT, did you not? Now, do you think that it's prudent to
automatically ASSUME that? If so, you are dumber than I ever imagined.
If not, then why do you DO just that?

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Basskisser,
I am not assuming your suffer from FAS because your mother was an alcoholic,
your inability to follow any train of thought, your severe anti-social
behavior, the fact that you think it is ok for your brother to go AWOL,
because he is smarter than everyone else, (plus too many other examples to
list), AND the fact that your mother was alcoholic is the reason why
everyone believes you either have FAS or some other brain disorder, possible
from excessive drug use.

Did I say that slow enough for you?




"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message

Ah, so, is it your contention that, if someone makes a claim, in order
for it to be valid, you must include proof?

Excuse me, I'm trying to work through your sentence structure here.
Does
the above mean that if someone makes a claim, I must include proof ?
That
could prove difficult. Or, does it mean that if someone makes a claim,
then
that person must include proof ?

As usual, you don't understand, and it leads to stupid question after
stupid question. John, if you honestly don't understand the above,
then you are too dumb to be involved in the thread.

Now, I'll ask one more time. Do YOU find it intelligent to get some
idea in your head, then post that allegation, or assumption AS FACT,
without any proof of those? Let's take an example, shall we? Because I
stated that my mother was an alcoholic, you and others automatically
got it in your ignorant minds that I have FAS, and stated that AS
FACT, did you not? Now, do you think that it's prudent to
automatically ASSUME that? If so, you are dumber than I ever imagined.
If not, then why do you DO just that?

To help you through this trying time in your life, I will show you were
you said that John should must include proof for it to be valid.

"... that, if someone makes a claim, in order for it to be valid, you must
include proof?"

OK, you talking to John, and asked him that question. You did not say "John
makes a claim" you used the pronoun "someone", but you did not tell John
that "someone" or "one" must include proof, you told John (using the pronoun
"you" in your conversation with John) that John must include proof.

Again, if you print this out and reread it, I am sure it will make sense to
you.

If you talk to a professional, I am sure they can help you with some
"tricks" to help you follow a logical train of thought.




"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:3BlXc.319665$%_6.241779@attbi_s01...
John,

Yes, Basskisser did say ... when someone makes a claim you (John) must
include proof in order for it to be valid.

I hope you are not too busy to keep up with it all.

You ARE stupid!!!!! Please show where I said that, will you?

"basskisser" wrote in message


Now, I'll ask one more time. Do YOU find it intelligent to get some
idea in your head, then post that allegation, or assumption AS FACT,
without any proof of those?

One more time? You've never asked me that question before. You did ask
"...is it your contention that, if someone makes a claim, in order for it to
be valid, you must include proof?" I answered that one as well as I was
able, given the difficulty in ascertaining your exact meaning. What you've
written above is an entirely new question.


Let's take an example, shall we? Because I
stated that my mother was an alcoholic, you and others automatically
got it in your ignorant minds that I have FAS, and stated that AS
FACT, did you not?

Yes, I did not. I have never stated or implied any such thing.


Now, do you think that it's prudent to
automatically ASSUME that?

I don't think it is prudent to automatically assume anything.


If so, you are dumber than I ever imagined.

Well, that would be very dumb indeed.

"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message


Now, I'll ask one more time. Do YOU find it intelligent to get some
idea in your head, then post that allegation, or assumption AS FACT,
without any proof of those?

One more time? You've never asked me that question before. You did ask
"...is it your contention that, if someone makes a claim, in order for it to
be valid, you must include proof?" I answered that one as well as I was
able, given the difficulty in ascertaining your exact meaning. What you've
written above is an entirely new question.


Let's take an example, shall we? Because I
stated that my mother was an alcoholic, you and others automatically
got it in your ignorant minds that I have FAS, and stated that AS
FACT, did you not?

Yes, I did not. I have never stated or implied any such thing.


Now, do you think that it's prudent to
automatically ASSUME that?

I don't think it is prudent to automatically assume anything.

Then why do you continually DO such? Need some examples?


If so, you are dumber than I ever imagined.

Well, that would be very dumb indeed.

It certainly WOULD.

"Comcast News" wrote in message news:j%qXc.73676$mD.20089@attbi_s02...
To help you through this trying time in your life, I will show you were
you said that John should must include proof for it to be valid.

"... that, if someone makes a claim, in order for it to be valid, you must
include proof?"

OK, you talking to John, and asked him that question. You did not say "John
makes a claim" you used the pronoun "someone", but you did not tell John
that "someone" or "one" must include proof, you told John (using the pronoun
"you" in your conversation with John) that John must include proof.

Again, if you print this out and reread it, I am sure it will make sense to
you.

If you talk to a professional, I am sure they can help you with some
"tricks" to help you follow a logical train of thought.


Holy ****, you are MUCH dumber than previously thought! If you can't
understand simple sentences, it would make me wonder why you don't
have any simple, logical thinking.

Basskisser,
This is another example of an addled brain.

John didn't say any of the things you are accusing him of.

I did.


ps - Do you like the way I kept it simple for you?


"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message


Now, I'll ask one more time. Do YOU find it intelligent to get some
idea in your head, then post that allegation, or assumption AS FACT,
without any proof of those?

One more time? You've never asked me that question before. You did ask
"...is it your contention that, if someone makes a claim, in order for it
to
be valid, you must include proof?" I answered that one as well as I was
able, given the difficulty in ascertaining your exact meaning. What
you've
written above is an entirely new question.


Let's take an example, shall we? Because I
stated that my mother was an alcoholic, you and others automatically
got it in your ignorant minds that I have FAS, and stated that AS
FACT, did you not?

Yes, I did not. I have never stated or implied any such thing.


Now, do you think that it's prudent to
automatically ASSUME that?

I don't think it is prudent to automatically assume anything.


If so, you are dumber than I ever imagined.

Well, that would be very dumb indeed.