I mostly agree. Buyer pays, with the understanding that seller will
reimburse if buyer buys. If it's a floating turd, buyer is hosed.


"BllFs6" wrote in message
...
Here is point nobody has seemed to explicity address.....but maybe I
missed
something....


Seller says boat is in conditon A (lots of variables here) for price B....

Buyer says....hey if it actually IS in condition A, you've got a deal for
price
B!

So, buyer brings in "expert" to look things over....

Expert says no friggin way this boat is in condition A, its a floating
terd
(for whatever particular reason).....

Who pays for expert in the first place and then who pays for expert after
buyer
smartly says no deal?

Now, if seller pays for expert in the first place, it could certainly be
conflict of interest....even if buyer is the person who choose the
expert....

If buyer pays and chooses the expert in the first place...why should the
buyer
shoulder the cost of the expert when its the seller who was most likely
trying
to pull the wool over someones eyes?

just a thought and question....

take care

Blll