Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
vze3j5ge wrote in message ...
My husband and I are considering purchase of a used boat - currently out of the water at our marina. We've spoken to a marine surveyor we might hire who says that the engine can be tested to some extent on land but that we really should put the boat in the water and check it out. Seems reasonable - but my question is one about procedure. Who usually pays for the marina to put boat in and take it out again in such a case - buyer or seller? This thread has sparked some heated discussion (surprise ![]() you many opinions. Here is what I do with my common sense and some (not much) boat buy/sell experience. The seller should as honestly as possible show and describe everyhting thats wrong with the boat while on land, i.e. the boat leaks a gallaon the hour, it runs fine but the throttle linkage is sticks ... it had such and such hull damage .. The motor runs fine/ok/not at all or whatever it does... it burns oil or gearcase leaks. Buyer then looks at everyhthing and based on the information from the seller and his OWN impression makes a decission if this deal for the $ works for him. To verify the sellers info they go for a sea trail which the seller pays. The seller will NOT go for a sea trail if someone is not sure about buying the boat if the boat performs as expected (important). Such sea trail shouldt cost that much for "a boat" if its small ... and the clever seller will have this cost worked in the sale price beforehand ![]() Seller assumes he will take 5 customers for trails and each cost him $30 for gas&launch so he ups his sale price by $150.... The buyer then buys the boat and is happy he didnt have to pay for the trail ![]() Seller is happy because he also didnt pay for the trail ![]() If the buyer wants the boat checked by a mechanic or surveyor that should be fully his own responsiblilty to pay for. Seller has to make the boat available and accesible for this. Should the seller have lied which is discovered then its a different story and the fight is on ... At the same note: Dont buy boats from people who are openly dishonest (its up to you to determine that). This is just my opinion as right or wrong it may be. Always remember common sense, fairness and honesty and the willigness to compromise is half the deal. I noticed that people you treat fair will lateron be willing to help which is worth more than a few $. A good deal is one that both parties would do again under the same circumstances knowing what they know after the deal. I dont know what value boat we are talking about but if its a $30000 boat then IMO its really irrelevant to argue wo pays $50 for a sea trail. Matt |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are correct. That is what several people including myself have been
saying. -- Tony my boats at http://t.thomas.home.mchsi.com "Matt Lang" wrote in message om... vze3j5ge wrote in message ... My husband and I are considering purchase of a used boat - currently out of the water at our marina. We've spoken to a marine surveyor we might hire who says that the engine can be tested to some extent on land but that we really should put the boat in the water and check it out. Seems reasonable - but my question is one about procedure. Who usually pays for the marina to put boat in and take it out again in such a case - buyer or seller? This thread has sparked some heated discussion (surprise ![]() you many opinions. Here is what I do with my common sense and some (not much) boat buy/sell experience. The seller should as honestly as possible show and describe everyhting thats wrong with the boat while on land, i.e. the boat leaks a gallaon the hour, it runs fine but the throttle linkage is sticks ... it had such and such hull damage .. The motor runs fine/ok/not at all or whatever it does... it burns oil or gearcase leaks. Buyer then looks at everyhthing and based on the information from the seller and his OWN impression makes a decission if this deal for the $ works for him. To verify the sellers info they go for a sea trail which the seller pays. The seller will NOT go for a sea trail if someone is not sure about buying the boat if the boat performs as expected (important). Such sea trail shouldt cost that much for "a boat" if its small ... and the clever seller will have this cost worked in the sale price beforehand ![]() Seller assumes he will take 5 customers for trails and each cost him $30 for gas&launch so he ups his sale price by $150.... The buyer then buys the boat and is happy he didnt have to pay for the trail ![]() Seller is happy because he also didnt pay for the trail ![]() If the buyer wants the boat checked by a mechanic or surveyor that should be fully his own responsiblilty to pay for. Seller has to make the boat available and accesible for this. Should the seller have lied which is discovered then its a different story and the fight is on ... At the same note: Dont buy boats from people who are openly dishonest (its up to you to determine that). This is just my opinion as right or wrong it may be. Always remember common sense, fairness and honesty and the willigness to compromise is half the deal. I noticed that people you treat fair will lateron be willing to help which is worth more than a few $. A good deal is one that both parties would do again under the same circumstances knowing what they know after the deal. I dont know what value boat we are talking about but if its a $30000 boat then IMO its really irrelevant to argue wo pays $50 for a sea trail. Matt |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tony Thomas" wrote in message news:SVwVc.199231$eM2.173171@attbi_s51...
You are correct. That is what several people including myself have been saying. ![]() With some filtering applied there is lots of great information in this newsgroup Matt |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote in message . ..
On 20 Aug 2004 17:05:41 -0700, (Matt Lang) wrote: vze3j5ge wrote in message ... My husband and I are considering purchase of a used boat - currently out of the water at our marina. We've spoken to a marine surveyor we might hire who says that the engine can be tested to some extent on land but that we really should put the boat in the water and check it out. Seems reasonable - but my question is one about procedure. Who usually pays for the marina to put boat in and take it out again in such a case - buyer or seller? ~~ snippity do da ~~ A good deal is one that both parties would do again under the same circumstances knowing what they know after the deal. Dewd!!! What planet do yo live on? I want to move there. :) Later, Tom Hahahaha I am not saying these good deals actually exist ![]() However if one doesnt sell with the intend to rip the other paty as much as possible then its easier to make deals Matt |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dictionary of Paddling Terms :-) | General | |||
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ | General | |||
push vs pull vis a vis rudders | Cruising | |||
Essentials of a Marine Boat Alarm System | Electronics | |||
Where to find ramp stories? | General |