"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:iuPSc.245165$%_6.139721@attbi_s01...
I sent you a link with the all 293 pages of the copyright law you broken.
I
copy you on the specific section of the law you have broken. I am not
certain if you have the ability to understand them, or if you are just
pretending not to understand them. Either way, I am bored with you.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:VoLSc.293172$XM6.82882@attbi_s53...
The paragraph you are referring is concerning copying a post made in
Usenet, not copying a news article published by a news agency online
and
in
a newspaper. You ignore the other 293 pages of the law.

Since I doubt any of the news agencies would waste their time in
prosecuting
the people who prefer to cut and paste articles instead of using their
own
intellectual abilities, if you prefer to ignore the law, you have a
very
low
probability of being convicted.


No, I've not "ignored" anything. I keep asking you, and I'll ask
again, specifically WHAT copyright law have I broken? And again, I
don't want someone's speculation, I want to know the law that I've
broken. If you can't provide it, the your case is moot.

LakeIzzy wrote:

"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:iuPSc.245165$%_6.139721@attbi_s01...
I sent you a link with the all 293 pages of the copyright law you broken.
I
copy you on the specific section of the law you have broken. I am not
certain if you have the ability to understand them, or if you are just
pretending not to understand them. Either way, I am bored with you.



"Comcast News" simply is the latest handle of "John Smith," which is
just another handle for one of regular posters here. They've been
bozo-binned on my computer.


--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

If you are ignoring my posts, why do you keep bother to keep telling
everyone you have my messages filtered? Since you favorite pastime is to
throw insults and profanity towards everyone who disagrees with you, you
obviously do not respond to mine, because you know you will lose any
discussion you have with me. I really don't care if you respond or not, so
feel free to keep telling everyone you have me filtered.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
LakeIzzy wrote:

"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:iuPSc.245165$%_6.139721@attbi_s01...
I sent you a link with the all 293 pages of the copyright law you
broken.
I
copy you on the specific section of the law you have broken. I am not
certain if you have the ability to understand them, or if you are just
pretending not to understand them. Either way, I am bored with you.



"Comcast News" simply is the latest handle of "John Smith," which is
just another handle for one of regular posters here. They've been
bozo-binned on my computer.


--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

"Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
link.net...


http://mb1.theinsiders.com/foregonst...cID=8036.topic

Did you have express permission to post that site?

What the hell. I did not copy the material, and it is probably not
copyrighted anyway. Links are legal. Stupid idiot. Ask you 5 year old
son
to explain it to you.

You dumb twit, YOU are the one who claims that "using" a website is
against copyright violations.

You are the twit. Where did I copy the material? I gave a link. And most
websites love links to their site. I guess you never copyrighted anything.

What to **** difference does it make whether or not I copyrighted
anything? Do you have to, to be able to understand the law?

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
link.net...



http://mb1.theinsiders.com/foregonst...cID=8036.topic

Did you have express permission to post that site?

What the hell. I did not copy the material, and it is probably not
copyrighted anyway. Links are legal. Stupid idiot. Ask you 5 year
old
son
to explain it to you.

You dumb twit, YOU are the one who claims that "using" a website is
against copyright violations.

You are the twit. Where did I copy the material? I gave a link. And
most
websites love links to their site. I guess you never copyrighted
anything.

What to **** difference does it make whether or not I copyrighted
anything? Do you have to, to be able to understand the law?

It seems so.

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:17:49 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

LakeIzzy wrote:

"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:iuPSc.245165$%_6.139721@attbi_s01...
I sent you a link with the all 293 pages of the copyright law you broken.
I
copy you on the specific section of the law you have broken. I am not
certain if you have the ability to understand them, or if you are just
pretending not to understand them. Either way, I am bored with you.



"Comcast News" simply is the latest handle of "John Smith," which is
just another handle for one of regular posters here. They've been
bozo-binned on my computer.

Bwaaaaaaaahahahahah!

This clown is killfiling someone! The number one Usenet nettiquette
offender!

What an idiot he must be... LOL!

"Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
link.net...



http://mb1.theinsiders.com/foregonst...cID=8036.topic

Did you have express permission to post that site?

What the hell. I did not copy the material, and it is probably not
copyrighted anyway. Links are legal. Stupid idiot. Ask you 5 year
old
son
to explain it to you.

You dumb twit, YOU are the one who claims that "using" a website is
against copyright violations.

You are the twit. Where did I copy the material? I gave a link. And
most
websites love links to their site. I guess you never copyrighted
anything.

What to **** difference does it make whether or not I copyrighted
anything? Do you have to, to be able to understand the law?

It seems so.

Then you are a ****ing idiot!!! You are saying that in order for
anyone to understand copyright law, they must have copyrighted
something???? Are you REALLY saying that, Bill?

Calif Bill wrote:

Stop licking your balls with treble hooks in your mouth.



--
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
And don't forget to pay your taxes so the rich don't have to!

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
link.net...



http://mb1.theinsiders.com/foregonst...cID=8036.topic

Did you have express permission to post that site?

What the hell. I did not copy the material, and it is probably not
copyrighted anyway. Links are legal. Stupid idiot. Ask you 5 year
old
son
to explain it to you.

You dumb twit, YOU are the one who claims that "using" a website is
against copyright violations.

You are the twit. Where did I copy the material? I gave a link. And
most
websites love links to their site. I guess you never copyrighted
anything.

What to **** difference does it make whether or not I copyrighted
anything? Do you have to, to be able to understand the law?

You never had an original thought, so therefore can not copyright.