"jim--" wrote in message ...
These cut and paste posts by you and Krause carry no validity.

1. You have violated copyright laws by reproducing and posting an entire
article

You fool!! The article isn't copyrighted, therefore, no copyright laws
have been violated.

2. You give no link to the reported story you cut and pasted.

I certainly stated where the article came from. You do know how to do
a search, don't you?

Krause has been know to edit articles so they meet his agenda.

Post the sections of the article you want to highlight, post a link to the
entire article, then comment on it and make the point you wish to make.

Failing to do so gives you and your cut and paste posts zero credibility.

Hmm, let's see, I told you where the article came from, but, because I
didn't post a URL, it's simply not credible? I love it!! This from a
person who makes assumptions, and post wild, unfounded allegations
about people, using absolutely NO facts!!!!!!

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
These cut and paste posts by you and Krause carry no validity.

1. You have violated copyright laws by reproducing and posting an
entire
article

You fool!! The article isn't copyrighted, therefore, no copyright laws
have been violated.

2. You give no link to the reported story you cut and pasted.

I certainly stated where the article came from. You do know how to do
a search, don't you?

Krause has been know to edit articles so they meet his agenda.

Post the sections of the article you want to highlight, post a link to
the
entire article, then comment on it and make the point you wish to make.

Failing to do so gives you and your cut and paste posts zero
credibility.

Hmm, let's see, I told you where the article came from, but, because I
didn't post a URL, it's simply not credible? I love it!! This from a
person who makes assumptions, and post wild, unfounded allegations
about people, using absolutely NO facts!!!!!!

Zoooooooooommmmmmmmmm. Right over your head....as usual.

"jim--" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
These cut and paste posts by you and Krause carry no validity.

1. You have violated copyright laws by reproducing and posting an
entire
article

You fool!! The article isn't copyrighted, therefore, no copyright laws
have been violated.

2. You give no link to the reported story you cut and pasted.

I certainly stated where the article came from. You do know how to do
a search, don't you?

Krause has been know to edit articles so they meet his agenda.

Post the sections of the article you want to highlight, post a link to
the
entire article, then comment on it and make the point you wish to make.

Failing to do so gives you and your cut and paste posts zero
credibility.

Hmm, let's see, I told you where the article came from, but, because I
didn't post a URL, it's simply not credible? I love it!! This from a
person who makes assumptions, and post wild, unfounded allegations
about people, using absolutely NO facts!!!!!!

Zoooooooooommmmmmmmmm. Right over your head....as usual.

Well, let's just start by you listing just exactly WHAT copyright laws
I have violated, shall we? I know you are stupid, so, we'll just break
your idiotic diatribe down to one point at a time, we'll start with
that one, seeing how it's first in your list.

Basskisser,
I don't know if you have cut and pasted entire articles published or written
by another person, but if you have you have violated the author's and the
publishers copyright, which is against the law. I think that is what jim
was talking about.

I think I posted this link but in case I didn't hit send, here is the link:

http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html

It is written so a non lawyer can understand the laws. Computers and the
internet have made it very easy to download music or cut and paste others
people's intellectual property without knowing they are stealing and
breaking the law. The first step to correcting this injustice is for people
to understand it is against the law, and damaging to those who created the
product that is being stolen.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
These cut and paste posts by you and Krause carry no validity.

1. You have violated copyright laws by reproducing and posting an
entire
article

You fool!! The article isn't copyrighted, therefore, no copyright laws
have been violated.

2. You give no link to the reported story you cut and pasted.

I certainly stated where the article came from. You do know how to do
a search, don't you?

Krause has been know to edit articles so they meet his agenda.

Post the sections of the article you want to highlight, post a link
to
the
entire article, then comment on it and make the point you wish to
make.

Failing to do so gives you and your cut and paste posts zero
credibility.

Hmm, let's see, I told you where the article came from, but, because I
didn't post a URL, it's simply not credible? I love it!! This from a
person who makes assumptions, and post wild, unfounded allegations
about people, using absolutely NO facts!!!!!!

Zoooooooooommmmmmmmmm. Right over your head....as usual.

Well, let's just start by you listing just exactly WHAT copyright laws
I have violated, shall we? I know you are stupid, so, we'll just break
your idiotic diatribe down to one point at a time, we'll start with
that one, seeing how it's first in your list.

"Comcast News" wrote in message news:oILRc.256255$JR4.37726@attbi_s54...
Basskisser,
I don't know if you have cut and pasted entire articles published or written
by another person, but if you have you have violated the author's and the
publishers copyright, which is against the law. I think that is what jim
was talking about.

I think I posted this link but in case I didn't hit send, here is the link:

http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html

It is written so a non lawyer can understand the laws. Computers and the
internet have made it very easy to download music or cut and paste others
people's intellectual property without knowing they are stealing and
breaking the law. The first step to correcting this injustice is for people
to understand it is against the law, and damaging to those who created the
product that is being stolen.

That is pure hogwash that would never hold up in a court of law. It is
just too vague. It would mean that, every time that someone here
posts, and then someone replies, and the reply has the original post,
and subsequent replies attached, they are violating copyright laws?


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
These cut and paste posts by you and Krause carry no validity.

1. You have violated copyright laws by reproducing and posting an
entire
article

You fool!! The article isn't copyrighted, therefore, no copyright laws
have been violated.

2. You give no link to the reported story you cut and pasted.

I certainly stated where the article came from. You do know how to do
a search, don't you?

Krause has been know to edit articles so they meet his agenda.

Post the sections of the article you want to highlight, post a link
to
the
entire article, then comment on it and make the point you wish to
make.

Failing to do so gives you and your cut and paste posts zero
credibility.

Hmm, let's see, I told you where the article came from, but, because I
didn't post a URL, it's simply not credible? I love it!! This from a
person who makes assumptions, and post wild, unfounded allegations
about people, using absolutely NO facts!!!!!!

Zoooooooooommmmmmmmmm. Right over your head....as usual.

Well, let's just start by you listing just exactly WHAT copyright laws
I have violated, shall we? I know you are stupid, so, we'll just break
your idiotic diatribe down to one point at a time, we'll start with
that one, seeing how it's first in your list.

It has been held up in court, many times. It is illegal to copy a published
article and then republish it in any format. Now the odds of you being
charged with theft of intellectual property is very slim, but if you only
obey laws because you feel their is a high probability of being prosecuted,
than you can probably download music and videos online, and copy someone
else's articles and republish them in rec.boats without losing a lot of
sleep.

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"Comcast News" wrote in message
news:oILRc.256255$JR4.37726@attbi_s54...
Basskisser,
I don't know if you have cut and pasted entire articles published or
written
by another person, but if you have you have violated the author's and
the
publishers copyright, which is against the law. I think that is what
jim
was talking about.

I think I posted this link but in case I didn't hit send, here is the
link:

http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html

It is written so a non lawyer can understand the laws. Computers and
the
internet have made it very easy to download music or cut and paste
others
people's intellectual property without knowing they are stealing and
breaking the law. The first step to correcting this injustice is for
people
to understand it is against the law, and damaging to those who created
the
product that is being stolen.

That is pure hogwash that would never hold up in a court of law. It is
just too vague. It would mean that, every time that someone here
posts, and then someone replies, and the reply has the original post,
and subsequent replies attached, they are violating copyright laws?


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
These cut and paste posts by you and Krause carry no validity.

1. You have violated copyright laws by reproducing and posting
an
entire
article

You fool!! The article isn't copyrighted, therefore, no copyright
laws
have been violated.

2. You give no link to the reported story you cut and pasted.

I certainly stated where the article came from. You do know how to
do
a search, don't you?

Krause has been know to edit articles so they meet his agenda.

Post the sections of the article you want to highlight, post a
link
to
the
entire article, then comment on it and make the point you wish
to
make.

Failing to do so gives you and your cut and paste posts zero
credibility.

Hmm, let's see, I told you where the article came from, but,
because I
didn't post a URL, it's simply not credible? I love it!! This from
a
person who makes assumptions, and post wild, unfounded allegations
about people, using absolutely NO facts!!!!!!

Zoooooooooommmmmmmmmm. Right over your head....as usual.

Well, let's just start by you listing just exactly WHAT copyright laws
I have violated, shall we? I know you are stupid, so, we'll just break
your idiotic diatribe down to one point at a time, we'll start with
that one, seeing how it's first in your list.

"Comcast News" wrote in message news:v5SRc.119596$eM2.57261@attbi_s51...
It has been held up in court, many times. It is illegal to copy a published
article and then republish it in any format. Now the odds of you being
charged with theft of intellectual property is very slim, but if you only
obey laws because you feel their is a high probability of being prosecuted,
than you can probably download music and videos online, and copy someone
else's articles and republish them in rec.boats without losing a lot of
sleep.

Perhaps, instead of someone's hypothesis, we should go right to the
source:
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998

Copyright Office Summary December 1998 Page 3
Registration as a Prerequisite to Suit
The remaining technical amendment relates to the prohibition in both
treaties
against conditioning the exercise or enjoyment of rights on the
fulfillment of
formalities. Section 411(a) of the Copyright Act requires claims to
copyright to be
registered with the Copyright Office before a lawsuit can be initiated
by the copyright
owner, but exempts many foreign works in order to comply with existing
treaty
obligations under the Berne Convention. Section 102(d) of the DMCA
amends section
411(a) by broadening the exemption to cover all foreign works.

Now, granted, this IS cut from a website, but it is law.

Comcast News wrote:

Basskisser,
I don't know if you have cut and pasted entire articles published or written
by another person, but if you have you have violated the author's and the
publishers copyright, which is against the law. I think that is what jim
was talking about.



Just what this newsgroup needs...another officious rightie.

--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

Harry,
I am amazed at your ability to ascertain that I wipe my butt, but how did
you decide that I am a rightie, whatever that is.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Comcast News wrote:

Basskisser,
I don't know if you have cut and pasted entire articles published or
written
by another person, but if you have you have violated the author's and
the
publishers copyright, which is against the law. I think that is what
jim
was talking about.



Just what this newsgroup needs...another officious rightie.

--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

Harry, you impress me as the type of person who downloads movies and music
illegally, and can not understand what's the big deal.

If you had ever created intellectual property, you might view the situation
differently.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Comcast News wrote:

Basskisser,
I don't know if you have cut and pasted entire articles published or
written
by another person, but if you have you have violated the author's and
the
publishers copyright, which is against the law. I think that is what
jim
was talking about.



Just what this newsgroup needs...another officious rightie.

--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002