"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
I recall you and the other libs attacking something the Zel Miller said
when
it was posted on this board.

Hypocrite.

Guess again.
I don't recall ever attacking Zel Miller. Or anything he said.


I recall it. You have.

On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:04:53 -0400, "jim--" wrote:

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
I recall you and the other libs attacking something the Zel Miller said
when
it was posted on this board.

Hypocrite.

Guess again.
I don't recall ever attacking Zel Miller. Or anything he said.


I recall it. You have.

Shouldn't be any problem for you to post a link to it, then, right?

"Joe Parsons" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:04:53 -0400, "jim--" wrote:

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
I recall you and the other libs attacking something the Zel Miller
said
when
it was posted on this board.

Hypocrite.

Guess again.
I don't recall ever attacking Zel Miller. Or anything he said.


I recall it. You have.

Shouldn't be any problem for you to post a link to it, then, right?


Correct. I had no problem finding it using Google. But as your buddy
Krause always says....find it yourself if you need a link. ;-)

On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:47:07 -0400, "jim--" wrote:


"Joe Parsons" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:04:53 -0400, "jim--" wrote:

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
I recall you and the other libs attacking something the Zel Miller
said
when
it was posted on this board.

Hypocrite.

Guess again.
I don't recall ever attacking Zel Miller. Or anything he said.


I recall it. You have.

Shouldn't be any problem for you to post a link to it, then, right?


Correct. I had no problem finding it using Google. But as your buddy
Krause always says....find it yourself if you need a link. ;-)

What in the world gives you the idea that the bilious Mr. Krause is a friend of
mine?

In any case, since you made the original assertion, the burden is on *you* to
substantiate it. I am frankly curious to see how you will do that. Just one
little link would do nicely.

Joe Parsons

"Joe Parsons" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:47:07 -0400, "jim--" wrote:


"Joe Parsons" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:04:53 -0400, "jim--" wrote:

"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
I recall you and the other libs attacking something the Zel Miller
said
when
it was posted on this board.

Hypocrite.

Guess again.
I don't recall ever attacking Zel Miller. Or anything he said.


I recall it. You have.

Shouldn't be any problem for you to post a link to it, then, right?


Correct. I had no problem finding it using Google. But as your buddy
Krause always says....find it yourself if you need a link. ;-)

What in the world gives you the idea that the bilious Mr. Krause is a
friend of
mine?

In any case, since you made the original assertion, the burden is on *you*
to
substantiate it. I am frankly curious to see how you will do that. Just
one
little link would do nicely.

Joe Parsons


Find it yourself.

On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:06:42 -0400, "jim--" wrote:

[snip]

Shouldn't be any problem for you to post a link to it, then, right?


Correct. I had no problem finding it using Google. But as your buddy
Krause always says....find it yourself if you need a link. ;-)

What in the world gives you the idea that the bilious Mr. Krause is a
friend of
mine?

In any case, since you made the original assertion, the burden is on *you*
to
substantiate it. I am frankly curious to see how you will do that. Just
one
little link would do nicely.

Joe Parsons


Find it yourself.

Wouldn't it be easier for you simply to admit you were...mistaken in your
original statement?

To be completely candid, I was looking forward to see just what you might
consider to be an "attack."

On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:01:24 -0400, in rec.boats you wrote:

I recall you [referring to Gould] and the other libs attacking something the Zel Miller said when
it was posted on this board.

Hypocrite.

Joe Parsons

"Joe Parsons" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:06:42 -0400, "jim--" wrote:

[snip]

Shouldn't be any problem for you to post a link to it, then, right?


Correct. I had no problem finding it using Google. But as your
buddy
Krause always says....find it yourself if you need a link. ;-)

What in the world gives you the idea that the bilious Mr. Krause is a
friend of
mine?

In any case, since you made the original assertion, the burden is on
*you*
to
substantiate it. I am frankly curious to see how you will do that.
Just
one
little link would do nicely.

Joe Parsons


Find it yourself.

Wouldn't it be easier for you simply to admit you were...mistaken in your
original statement?

Why should I? I spoke the truth.



To be completely candid, I was looking forward to see just what you might
consider to be an "attack."

Then do a google search and go find out.



On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:01:24 -0400, in rec.boats you wrote:

I recall you [referring to Gould] and the other libs attacking something
the Zel Miller said when
it was posted on this board.

Hypocrite.

Yep, and he is.

I recall it. You have.


Since you recall it, perhaps you will refresh my memory regarding what it was I
said?

The burden of proof is on the accuser.
At least that's the way it always used to be, and will be again (hopefully
sooner rather than later).