Dave Hall wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:24:54 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:


Why would these people
have a need to run them near people, instead of open water?

How do you get to the open water?

You don't have to go wide open to get there do you?

But you can, so why not, if it's what you enjoy?

Dave


Because it is noisy, obnoxious behavior that can and often does intrude
upon others.

Your opinions are obnoxious behavior that intrudes upon others. So who
are you to make value judgements?

Ahh, but there's a difference. If you think my opinions represent
obnoxious behavior, you can filter me out or not read them, eh? But when
assholes like you drive by in their unmuffled penis boats, one cannot
filter you out. Your obnoxious behavior is right there...

Got it?


Which is more than made up for by the "hi five" signs they get from
others who appreciate the fine art of high performance.

There's nothing "high performance" about these overpowered stock boats.
They're mostly just deep vees with huge modified car engines. What a
yawner.



--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:2o1kraF5sfq2U1@uni- Ahh, but there's a difference. If you think my
opinions represent
obnoxious behavior, you can filter me out or not read them, eh? But when
assholes like you drive by in their unmuffled penis boats, one cannot
filter you out. Your obnoxious behavior is right there...

I do have to agree you on this one. Your behavior is as obnoxious as an
unmuffled high performance boat.

On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:38:52 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:24:54 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:


Why would these people
have a need to run them near people, instead of open water?

How do you get to the open water?

You don't have to go wide open to get there do you?

But you can, so why not, if it's what you enjoy?

Dave


Because it is noisy, obnoxious behavior that can and often does intrude
upon others.

Your opinions are obnoxious behavior that intrudes upon others. So who
are you to make value judgements?

Ahh, but there's a difference. If you think my opinions represent
obnoxious behavior, you can filter me out or not read them, eh? But when
assholes like you drive by in their unmuffled penis boats, one cannot
filter you out. Your obnoxious behavior is right there...

You can always leave if it bothers you so much. It must really suck
being someone who is so sensitive to others activities to the point
that you would vocally oppose their right to enjoy life, because they
"bother" you.


Which is more than made up for by the "hi five" signs they get from
others who appreciate the fine art of high performance.

There's nothing "high performance" about these overpowered stock boats.
They're mostly just deep vees with huge modified car engines. What a
yawner.

And once again, you demonstrate your extreme ignorance of the subject.
Stick to language obfuscation, you obviously know little about
mechanics or engineering subjects.

High performance hull designs have evolved considerably in the last
several years. There is much more to a high performance boat than an
"Overpowered deep V".
On the subject of engines, how many inboard engines do you know of,
that aren't "modified car engines"? Nothing earth shattering about
that revelation.

Trying reading a little on the subject before you subject yourself to
another helping of shoe leather....

Dave

Dave Hall wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:38:52 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:24:54 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:


Why would these people
have a need to run them near people, instead of open water?

How do you get to the open water?

You don't have to go wide open to get there do you?

But you can, so why not, if it's what you enjoy?

Dave


Because it is noisy, obnoxious behavior that can and often does intrude
upon others.

Your opinions are obnoxious behavior that intrudes upon others. So who
are you to make value judgements?

Ahh, but there's a difference. If you think my opinions represent
obnoxious behavior, you can filter me out or not read them, eh? But when
assholes like you drive by in their unmuffled penis boats, one cannot
filter you out. Your obnoxious behavior is right there...

You can always leave if it bothers you so much. It must really suck
being someone who is so sensitive to others activities to the point
that you would vocally oppose their right to enjoy life, because they
"bother" you.

Ahh, but this is the fallacy in your position. Folks enjoying peace and
quiet, and some asshole with a loud boat comes by and shatters it all.
And stays around. So...the folks who were enjoying the peace and quiet
are the ones who should leave.





--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 07:35:21 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:


Ahh, but there's a difference. If you think my opinions represent
obnoxious behavior, you can filter me out or not read them, eh? But when
assholes like you drive by in their unmuffled penis boats, one cannot
filter you out. Your obnoxious behavior is right there...

You can always leave if it bothers you so much. It must really suck
being someone who is so sensitive to others activities to the point
that you would vocally oppose their right to enjoy life, because they
"bother" you.

Ahh, but this is the fallacy in your position. Folks enjoying peace and
quiet, and some asshole with a loud boat comes by and shatters it all.
And stays around. So...the folks who were enjoying the peace and quiet
are the ones who should leave.


So you want to get philosophical on me eh? Is quiet simply the absence
of noise? Or is noise simply the absence of quiet. Does someone's
right to enjoy the absence of noise supersede another's right to enjoy
the absence of quiet?

Dave

Dave Hall wrote:

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 07:35:21 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:


Ahh, but there's a difference. If you think my opinions represent
obnoxious behavior, you can filter me out or not read them, eh? But when
assholes like you drive by in their unmuffled penis boats, one cannot
filter you out. Your obnoxious behavior is right there...

You can always leave if it bothers you so much. It must really suck
being someone who is so sensitive to others activities to the point
that you would vocally oppose their right to enjoy life, because they
"bother" you.

Ahh, but this is the fallacy in your position. Folks enjoying peace and
quiet, and some asshole with a loud boat comes by and shatters it all.
And stays around. So...the folks who were enjoying the peace and quiet
are the ones who should leave.


So you want to get philosophical on me eh? Is quiet simply the absence
of noise? Or is noise simply the absence of quiet. Does someone's
right to enjoy the absence of noise supersede another's right to enjoy
the absence of quiet?

Dave


Yeah, it does. There is no practical reason for a penisboat to be a
disturber of the peace. Effective marine engine sound control systems
are readily available. When we lived on the ICW in Florida, I reported a
number of noise-offending boats to the County authorities and on several
occasions, they chased down the obnoxious idiots and gave them a
citation for violation of noise-control laws. Perhaps we need to work on
such regs for Maryland.

--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002