I have had two boats. The first one I bought when "Old Bush" was in office, and
the second one when "Young Bush" was in office. I think I'll keep voting for
Bush!

In article ,
says...
I have had two boats. The first one I bought when "Old Bush" was in office, and
the second one when "Young Bush" was in office. I think I'll keep voting for
Bush!

Unfortunately, people are having to give up their boats under Bush
because their wages aren't what they used to be.

jps

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
I have had two boats. The first one I bought when "Old Bush" was in
office, and
the second one when "Young Bush" was in office. I think I'll keep voting
for
Bush!

Unfortunately, people are having to give up their boats under Bush
because their wages aren't what they used to be.


I've purchased 3 boats since Bush has been President...all of 'em used. The
first one was because the original owner was moving up into a 30' Sea Ray.
The second one was because the marina where it was stored is being knocked
down to build a high rise condo. The third one was because the 84 year old
man who owned it died. None were for sale because the owner "had to give up
their boat because of lower wages".

NOYB wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
I have had two boats. The first one I bought when "Old Bush" was in
office, and
the second one when "Young Bush" was in office. I think I'll keep voting
for
Bush!

Unfortunately, people are having to give up their boats under Bush
because their wages aren't what they used to be.


I've purchased 3 boats since Bush has been President...all of 'em used. The
first one was because the original owner was moving up into a 30' Sea Ray.
The second one was because the marina where it was stored is being knocked
down to build a high rise condo. The third one was because the 84 year old
man who owned it died. None were for sale because the owner "had to give up
their boat because of lower wages".




So...are you trying to extrapolate "reality" of your your statistical
base of yourself?

--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
I have had two boats. The first one I bought when "Old Bush" was in
office, and
the second one when "Young Bush" was in office. I think I'll keep
voting
for
Bush!

Unfortunately, people are having to give up their boats under Bush
because their wages aren't what they used to be.


I've purchased 3 boats since Bush has been President...all of 'em used.
The
first one was because the original owner was moving up into a 30' Sea
Ray.
The second one was because the marina where it was stored is being
knocked
down to build a high rise condo. The third one was because the 84 year
old
man who owned it died. None were for sale because the owner "had to
give up
their boat because of lower wages".




So...are you trying to extrapolate "reality" of your your statistical
base of yourself?



No more so than jps stating "Unfortunately, people are having to give up
their boats under Bush because their wages aren't what they used to be"
without offering any facts about boat ownership declining under Bush.

I would rather trust real life stories than unsubstantiated opinions.

Try to be balanced rather than purely partisan Krause. Is that at all
possible?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
I have had two boats. The first one I bought when "Old Bush" was in
office, and
the second one when "Young Bush" was in office. I think I'll keep
voting
for
Bush!

Unfortunately, people are having to give up their boats under Bush
because their wages aren't what they used to be.


I've purchased 3 boats since Bush has been President...all of 'em used.
The
first one was because the original owner was moving up into a 30' Sea
Ray.
The second one was because the marina where it was stored is being
knocked
down to build a high rise condo. The third one was because the 84 year
old
man who owned it died. None were for sale because the owner "had to
give up
their boat because of lower wages".




So...are you trying to extrapolate "reality" of your your statistical
base of yourself?

I used anecdotal evidence to counter jps's claim that people have had to
give up their boats because of lower wages. Perhaps you or jps can give me
anecdotal evidence that *supports* his claim? Until then, my unscientific
claim trumps his unscientific claim.

NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
I have had two boats. The first one I bought when "Old Bush" was in
office, and
the second one when "Young Bush" was in office. I think I'll keep
voting
for
Bush!

Unfortunately, people are having to give up their boats under Bush
because their wages aren't what they used to be.


I've purchased 3 boats since Bush has been President...all of 'em used.
The
first one was because the original owner was moving up into a 30' Sea
Ray.
The second one was because the marina where it was stored is being
knocked
down to build a high rise condo. The third one was because the 84 year
old
man who owned it died. None were for sale because the owner "had to
give up
their boat because of lower wages".




So...are you trying to extrapolate "reality" of your your statistical
base of yourself?

I used anecdotal evidence to counter jps's claim that people have had to
give up their boats because of lower wages. Perhaps you or jps can give me
anecdotal evidence that *supports* his claim? Until then, my unscientific
claim trumps his unscientific claim.


No, ot doesn't. It's just an anecdote.

--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

In article , says...

So...are you trying to extrapolate "reality" of your your statistical
base of yourself?



No more so than jps stating "Unfortunately, people are having to give up
their boats under Bush because their wages aren't what they used to be"
without offering any facts about boat ownership declining under Bush.

I would rather trust real life stories than unsubstantiated opinions.

Here Dennis. See if this reaches your cranium...

Americans' incomes fell for two years

Report: IRS data shows first-ever consecutive-year drop; loss of jobs
blamed.
July 29, 2004: 12:59 PM EDT


NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Americans' overall income shrank for two
consecutive years after stocks plunged in 2000, the first time that has
effectively happened since the current tax system was put in place
during World War II, according to a published report Thursday.

The New York Times, reporting data from the Internal Revenue Service,
said gross income reported to the agency fell 5.1 percent to $6.0
trillion in 2002, the most recent year for which data is available, down
from $6.35 trillion in 2000. Because of population growth, average
income fell even more, by 5.7 percent, and adjusted for inflation the
decline was 9.2 percent.

In article , says...

I used anecdotal evidence to counter jps's claim that people have had to
give up their boats because of lower wages. Perhaps you or jps can give me
anecdotal evidence that *supports* his claim? Until then, my unscientific
claim trumps his unscientific claim.

Think this promotes boat ownership?

Americans' incomes fell for two years

Report: IRS data shows first-ever consecutive-year drop; loss of jobs
blamed.
July 29, 2004: 12:59 PM EDT

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Americans' overall income shrank for two
consecutive years after stocks plunged in 2000, the first time that has
effectively happened since the current tax system was put in place
during World War II, according to a published report Thursday.

The New York Times, reporting data from the Internal Revenue Service,
said gross income reported to the agency fell 5.1 percent to $6.0
trillion in 2002, the most recent year for which data is available, down
from $6.35 trillion in 2000. Because of population growth, average
income fell even more, by 5.7 percent, and adjusted for inflation the
decline was 9.2 percent.

"jps" wrote in message
...

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Americans' overall income shrank for two
consecutive years after stocks plunged in 2000...

Yes, we already knew that. The stock market plunge in the final year of
Clinton's second term hurt Americans' income for the next two years. Now,
where in your article does it say that people had to sell their boats?