On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 20:43:50 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 19:03:07 -0500, JohnH
wrote:

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 13:48:36 -0800, "jps" wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...

The info on the CIA agent was provided by the husband of the CIA agent in
the
hopes of causing problems for the administration. This is as factual a
statement
as your's.

No, I don't think the Republicans have stooped quite that low.

That's a complete fabrication and has absolutely no basis in fact, Mr.
"No-Spin," since Novak has already said that the information came from two
"Senior White House officials" and Joe is clearly not a senior white house
official.

The Starr inquiry information was leaked by Starr's own legal team, as was
confirmed by reporters who broke that story.

So, you are incorrect in assuming your statement is as factual as
basskisser's.

By your own logic the Republicans have, in fact, stooped lower.

Oh, so you DO believe everything Novak says! (Either you or one of your cohorts
made some very unflattering comments about him recently.) Personally, I have
doubts about Novak's accuracy, or perhaps our interpretation of it.


John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD

Well, of course, John. You "have doubts" about anything, and I mean
anything, that shows your boy Bush or his cohorts in a bad way. You're
so far into denial about the Republicans you've fallen into a black
hole.

Hee, hee, hee!! (More chuckles!)

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD