Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JohnH" wrote in message
... The revelation that Democrats are using the intelligence committee to conduct opposition research for the coming presidential campaign demands an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Hannity said. Right. Maybe that investigation can begin as soon as the Justice Department is finished with its "inquiry" into who leaked the identity of the CIA agent. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
... "JohnH" wrote in message ... The revelation that Democrats are using the intelligence committee to conduct opposition research for the coming presidential campaign demands an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Hannity said. Right. Maybe that investigation can begin as soon as the Justice Department is finished with its "inquiry" into who leaked the identity of the CIA agent. But not until the White House ordered commision on 911 is actually given the materials requested from the White House. What an incredible case of footdragging there. When Bush says something, you can fairly well predict he means exactly the opposite. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 11:51:03 -0800, "jps" wrote:
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "JohnH" wrote in message ... The revelation that Democrats are using the intelligence committee to conduct opposition research for the coming presidential campaign demands an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Hannity said. Right. Maybe that investigation can begin as soon as the Justice Department is finished with its "inquiry" into who leaked the identity of the CIA agent. But not until the White House ordered commision on 911 is actually given the materials requested from the White House. What an incredible case of footdragging there. When Bush says something, you can fairly well predict he means exactly the opposite. You're not trying to change the subject, are you? John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JohnH wrote in message
"The approach outlined above seems to offer the best prospect for exposing the administration's dubious motives." [End of Memo Excerpt.] The revelation that Democrats are using the intelligence committee to conduct opposition research for the coming presidential campaign demands an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Hannity said. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2...4/165925.shtml John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD Do you not think that Republicans take the same approach to partisan politics? Do you not think that they scheme, and write memos to other Republicans on how to oust a particular Democrat they want out? Now watch, we'll have a Ken Starr like investigation, but CIA leaks aren't worth and outside investigation, why? Because it was the republicans that did that! Plain and simple, it's okay if a republican leaks CIA confidential material, but if a democrat rights a memo detailing how they plan to bring forth matters of political importance to the people, the republicans then start crying and whining.... |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"basskisser" wrote in message
om... JohnH wrote in message "The approach outlined above seems to offer the best prospect for exposing the administration's dubious motives." [End of Memo Excerpt.] The revelation that Democrats are using the intelligence committee to conduct opposition research for the coming presidential campaign demands an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Hannity said. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2...4/165925.shtml John On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD Do you not think that Republicans take the same approach to partisan politics? Do you not think that they scheme, and write memos to other Republicans on how to oust a particular Democrat they want out? Now watch, we'll have a Ken Starr like investigation, but CIA leaks aren't worth and outside investigation, why? Can you say "Iran-Contra scandal"??? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JohnH" wrote in message
... The info on the CIA agent was provided by the husband of the CIA agent in the hopes of causing problems for the administration. This is as factual a statement as your's. No, I don't think the Republicans have stooped quite that low. That's a complete fabrication and has absolutely no basis in fact, Mr. "No-Spin," since Novak has already said that the information came from two "Senior White House officials" and Joe is clearly not a senior white house official. The Starr inquiry information was leaked by Starr's own legal team, as was confirmed by reporters who broke that story. So, you are incorrect in assuming your statement is as factual as basskisser's. By your own logic the Republicans have, in fact, stooped lower. |