On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:45:59 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 08:10:20 -0400, John wrote:

I think Trump is hurting his chances of reelection with every nightly briefing
he holds. He's continuously making an ass of himself. Last night my wife even
got tired of it after the first twenty minutes.

===

The only thing that surprises me is why it has taken so long for
people to figure him out. There are reasons why no major US bank will
do business with him. I hate to say I told you so but...

...I did.
Who? Trump or Harry? :-)

Kinda makes you wonder


On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:45:59 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 08:10:20 -0400, John wrote:

I think Trump is hurting his chances of reelection with every nightly briefing
he holds. He's continuously making an ass of himself. Last night my wife even
got tired of it after the first twenty minutes.

===

The only thing that surprises me is why it has taken so long for
people to figure him out. There are reasons why no major US bank will
do business with him. I hate to say I told you so but...

...I did.
Who? Trump or Harry? :-)

On 4/20/20 12:42 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:45:59 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 08:10:20 -0400, John wrote:

I think Trump is hurting his chances of reelection with every nightly briefing
he holds. He's continuously making an ass of himself. Last night my wife even
got tired of it after the first twenty minutes.

===

The only thing that surprises me is why it has taken so long for
people to figure him out. There are reasons why no major US bank will
do business with him. I hate to say I told you so but...

...I did.
Who? Trump or Harry? :-)


I've had the same main banking relationship for 25 years, and I only
ended the one before that because the bank I was using at the time
merged with a national bank of assholes. I added a second bank during
the end of the Bush Admin when a number of banks were in serious
trouble, but the "longtime" bank survived.

How many years have you had the same banking relationship, Mr. Trumpster?

--
MAGA - Manipulating America's Gullible Assholes

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:05:21 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 4/20/20 12:42 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:45:59 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 08:10:20 -0400, John wrote:

I think Trump is hurting his chances of reelection with every nightly briefing
he holds. He's continuously making an ass of himself. Last night my wife even
got tired of it after the first twenty minutes.

===

The only thing that surprises me is why it has taken so long for
people to figure him out. There are reasons why no major US bank will
do business with him. I hate to say I told you so but...

...I did.
Who? Trump or Harry? :-)


I've had the same main banking relationship for 25 years, and I only
ended the one before that because the bank I was using at the time
merged with a national bank of assholes. I added a second bank during
the end of the Bush Admin when a number of banks were in serious
trouble, but the "longtime" bank survived.

How many years have you had the same banking relationship, Mr. Trumpster?

Tell us about this 'bank' Krause.

Defendant
Name: Krause, Harry N
(Address snipped)
Huntingtown, MD

Plaintiff
Name: Mariner Finance, LLC
Address: 8211 Town Center Dr
City: NottinghamState:MDZip Code:21236
--

Freedom Isn't Free!

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:05:21 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/20/20 12:42 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:45:59 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 08:10:20 -0400, John wrote:

I think Trump is hurting his chances of reelection with every nightly briefing
he holds. He's continuously making an ass of himself. Last night my wife even
got tired of it after the first twenty minutes.

===

The only thing that surprises me is why it has taken so long for
people to figure him out. There are reasons why no major US bank will
do business with him. I hate to say I told you so but...

...I did.
Who? Trump or Harry? :-)


I've had the same main banking relationship for 25 years, and I only
ended the one before that because the bank I was using at the time
merged with a national bank of assholes. I added a second bank during
the end of the Bush Admin when a number of banks were in serious
trouble, but the "longtime" bank survived.

How many years have you had the same banking relationship, Mr. Trumpster?

45 years at one and 37 years at another. The new kid on the block is
25. Opened the year before I retired
Next.

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:28:10 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



Listening to the leader of the left pack, Nancy Pelosi,
it's obvious what Dems are counting on.

They have nothing to lose. They are making a big deal
out of the push to restart the economy by Trump, hoping
upon hope that it backfires and causes a resurgence of
covid-19 cases. If that happens to a significant
degree, Trump is toast in November. They will go on
the attack reminding everyone that they said the
economy should not be restarted until the entire
nation was tested and covid-19 was gone.

I am sure that even many Dems privately recognize that
relaxing some of the "stay at home" recommendations
in order to get the economy going again is as important
(if not more so long term) than the containment of the virus.
It's a balancing act. However, Trump's focus on
the economy presents them with the perfect political
strategy for his defeat in November.

I was also thinking about Biden and his running mate
selection. He has already committed to picking a
woman.

If he and the Dems were smart they should pick
Tulsi Gabbard. Of all the potential Democrats,
she would receive the most support of Independents
and even some Republicans. If he chooses any of the
others (Warren, Harris, Klobuchar, etc.) the political
division of the nation and voters doesn't change at all. Republicans
are going to support Trump and Dems are going to support
Biden.

Tulsi Gabbard as his running mate could swing the election
in his favor.

People will really need to look hard at who runs with Biden. Even if
you ignore the "Curse of Tippecanoe", Biden's mental and physical
health is an issue. There is a very good chance the VP will ascend.
It should be noted, most of the worst presidents ever came after the
death of the sitting president.

On 4/20/20 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:28:10 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



Listening to the leader of the left pack, Nancy Pelosi,
it's obvious what Dems are counting on.

They have nothing to lose. They are making a big deal
out of the push to restart the economy by Trump, hoping
upon hope that it backfires and causes a resurgence of
covid-19 cases. If that happens to a significant
degree, Trump is toast in November. They will go on
the attack reminding everyone that they said the
economy should not be restarted until the entire
nation was tested and covid-19 was gone.

I am sure that even many Dems privately recognize that
relaxing some of the "stay at home" recommendations
in order to get the economy going again is as important
(if not more so long term) than the containment of the virus.
It's a balancing act. However, Trump's focus on
the economy presents them with the perfect political
strategy for his defeat in November.

I was also thinking about Biden and his running mate
selection. He has already committed to picking a
woman.

If he and the Dems were smart they should pick
Tulsi Gabbard. Of all the potential Democrats,
she would receive the most support of Independents
and even some Republicans. If he chooses any of the
others (Warren, Harris, Klobuchar, etc.) the political
division of the nation and voters doesn't change at all. Republicans
are going to support Trump and Dems are going to support
Biden.

Tulsi Gabbard as his running mate could swing the election
in his favor.

People will really need to look hard at who runs with Biden. Even if
you ignore the "Curse of Tippecanoe", Biden's mental and physical
health is an issue. There is a very good chance the VP will ascend.
It should be noted, most of the worst presidents ever came after the
death of the sitting president.


Your boy Trump, who tips the scale at 325+ and has obvious cognitive
problems, will go first. Biden has a lifelong stuttering problem.

--
MAGA - Manipulating America's Gullible Assholes

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:06:38 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/20/20 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:28:10 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



Listening to the leader of the left pack, Nancy Pelosi,
it's obvious what Dems are counting on.

They have nothing to lose. They are making a big deal
out of the push to restart the economy by Trump, hoping
upon hope that it backfires and causes a resurgence of
covid-19 cases. If that happens to a significant
degree, Trump is toast in November. They will go on
the attack reminding everyone that they said the
economy should not be restarted until the entire
nation was tested and covid-19 was gone.

I am sure that even many Dems privately recognize that
relaxing some of the "stay at home" recommendations
in order to get the economy going again is as important
(if not more so long term) than the containment of the virus.
It's a balancing act. However, Trump's focus on
the economy presents them with the perfect political
strategy for his defeat in November.

I was also thinking about Biden and his running mate
selection. He has already committed to picking a
woman.

If he and the Dems were smart they should pick
Tulsi Gabbard. Of all the potential Democrats,
she would receive the most support of Independents
and even some Republicans. If he chooses any of the
others (Warren, Harris, Klobuchar, etc.) the political
division of the nation and voters doesn't change at all. Republicans
are going to support Trump and Dems are going to support
Biden.

Tulsi Gabbard as his running mate could swing the election
in his favor.

People will really need to look hard at who runs with Biden. Even if
you ignore the "Curse of Tippecanoe", Biden's mental and physical
health is an issue. There is a very good chance the VP will ascend.
It should be noted, most of the worst presidents ever came after the
death of the sitting president.


Your boy Trump, who tips the scale at 325+ and has obvious cognitive
problems, will go first. Biden has a lifelong stuttering problem.


You didn't mind that fat **** Clinton so weight shouldn't be an issue.
I doubt Johnson wanted to be seen on a scale either.

The problem is that his brain stutters too. He is an old **** with
dementia, perhaps the early stages of alzheimer. We already had that
with Reagan in his last term. I am not sure we need it again. This
could very well end up being a rerun of the Wilson administration
where his wife was running the government for a number of years.

On 4/20/2020 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:28:10 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



Listening to the leader of the left pack, Nancy Pelosi,
it's obvious what Dems are counting on.

They have nothing to lose. They are making a big deal
out of the push to restart the economy by Trump, hoping
upon hope that it backfires and causes a resurgence of
covid-19 cases. If that happens to a significant
degree, Trump is toast in November. They will go on
the attack reminding everyone that they said the
economy should not be restarted until the entire
nation was tested and covid-19 was gone.

I am sure that even many Dems privately recognize that
relaxing some of the "stay at home" recommendations
in order to get the economy going again is as important
(if not more so long term) than the containment of the virus.
It's a balancing act. However, Trump's focus on
the economy presents them with the perfect political
strategy for his defeat in November.

I was also thinking about Biden and his running mate
selection. He has already committed to picking a
woman.

If he and the Dems were smart they should pick
Tulsi Gabbard. Of all the potential Democrats,
she would receive the most support of Independents
and even some Republicans. If he chooses any of the
others (Warren, Harris, Klobuchar, etc.) the political
division of the nation and voters doesn't change at all. Republicans
are going to support Trump and Dems are going to support
Biden.

Tulsi Gabbard as his running mate could swing the election
in his favor.

People will really need to look hard at who runs with Biden. Even if
you ignore the "Curse of Tippecanoe", Biden's mental and physical
health is an issue. There is a very good chance the VP will ascend.
It should be noted, most of the worst presidents ever came after the
death of the sitting president.



Biden has said it will be a woman.

Of the semi-obvious choices .... which one would you rather see
as being a heart beat away?

I'd pick Gabbard. Others might pick Klobuchar. The rest of
the obvious are just way too left.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

On 4/20/20 1:25 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/20/2020 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:28:10 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



Listening to the leader of the left pack, Nancy Pelosi,
it's obvious what Dems are counting on.

They have nothing to lose.Â* They are making a big deal
out of the push to restart the economy by Trump, hoping
upon hope that it backfires and causes a resurgence of
covid-19 cases.Â* If that happens to a significant
degree, Trump is toast in November.Â* They will go on
the attack reminding everyone that they said the
economy should not be restarted until the entire
nation was tested and covid-19 was gone.

I am sure that even many Dems privately recognize that
relaxing some of the "stay at home" recommendations
in order to get the economy going again is as important
(if not more so long term) than the containment of the virus.
It's a balancing act.Â* However, Trump's focus on
the economy presents them with the perfect political
strategy for his defeat in November.

I was also thinking about Biden and his running mate
selection.Â* He has already committed to picking a
woman.

If he and the Dems were smart they should pick
Tulsi Gabbard.Â* Of all the potential Democrats,
she would receive the most support of Independents
and even some Republicans.Â* If he chooses any of the
others (Warren, Harris, Klobuchar, etc.) the political
division of the nation and voters doesn't change at all.Â* Republicans
are going to support Trump and Dems are going to support
Biden.

Tulsi Gabbard as his running mate could swing the election
in his favor.

People will really need to look hard at who runs with Biden. Even if
you ignore the "Curse of Tippecanoe", Biden's mental and physical
health is an issue. There is a very good chance the VP will ascend.
It should be noted, most of the worst presidents ever came after the
death of the sitting president.



Biden has said it will be a woman.

Of the semi-obvious choices .... which one would you rather see
as being a heart beat away?

I'd pick Gabbard.Â* Others might pick Klobuchar.Â*Â* The rest of
the obvious are just way too left.



Wherever they are on the spectrum, none are as crazy or incompetent or
ignorant than Trump. Gabbard has as much chance of being on the Dem
ticket as you do.

--
MAGA - Manipulating America's Gullible Assholes