Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
JohnH
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT I am ashamed

On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:54:07 -0500, DSK wrote:

JohnH wrote:


Much ado about nothing.


So JohnH, I assume (from something in one of your post a while back) that you were in the military. You think it's great to have a CinC who turns his back on
military casualties?

DSK

Yes, I was. The President is not "turning his back on military casualties". This
is a great example of tripe developed by libs. No one could reasonably expect
the President to welcome every plane that arrives at Dover carrying wounded or
deceased military. He does have a few other things to do.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
  #2   Report Post  
jps
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT I am ashamed

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:54:07 -0500, DSK wrote:

JohnH wrote:


Much ado about nothing.


So JohnH, I assume (from something in one of your post a while back) that

you were in the military. You think it's great to have a CinC who turns his
back on
military casualties?

DSK

Yes, I was. The President is not "turning his back on military

casualties". This
is a great example of tripe developed by libs. No one could reasonably

expect
the President to welcome every plane that arrives at Dover carrying

wounded or
deceased military. He does have a few other things to do.


I'd like to hear you repeat that for a room full of ex-parents, widows and
fatherless children.


  #3   Report Post  
JohnH
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT I am ashamed

On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:00:31 -0800, "jps" wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:54:07 -0500, DSK wrote:

JohnH wrote:


Much ado about nothing.

So JohnH, I assume (from something in one of your post a while back) that

you were in the military. You think it's great to have a CinC who turns his
back on
military casualties?

DSK

Yes, I was. The President is not "turning his back on military

casualties". This
is a great example of tripe developed by libs. No one could reasonably

expect
the President to welcome every plane that arrives at Dover carrying

wounded or
deceased military. He does have a few other things to do.


I'd like to hear you repeat that for a room full of ex-parents, widows and
fatherless children.

I have been the Survivor Assistance Officer for my share of casualties. Not one
has ever had the idea that their son's remains be met at the CONUS arrival
facility by the President. If it's such a big shortcoming, why hasn't the Senate
minority leader, Daschle, made the trip to Dover? Is he being disrespectful? He
isn't the President, or CinC, but so what? He considers himself to be a very
important person with much higher standing than the President.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
  #4   Report Post  
jps
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT I am ashamed

"JohnH" wrote in message
...

I have been the Survivor Assistance Officer for my share of casualties.

Not one
has ever had the idea that their son's remains be met at the CONUS arrival
facility by the President. If it's such a big shortcoming, why hasn't the

Senate
minority leader, Daschle, made the trip to Dover? Is he being

disrespectful? He
isn't the President, or CinC, but so what? He considers himself to be a

very
important person with much higher standing than the President.


We're not talking about the asshole in office never attending a single
funeral, we're talking about the systematic hiding of casualties and the
poor treatment the people who've been injured in Iraq are receiving.

Our heros are second class citizens whose benefits, pay and basic humane
treatment (such as bullet proof vests) are overlooked or purposely denied by
this administration.

Shame on all of us for letting this happen.


  #5   Report Post  
Harry Krause
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT I am ashamed

jps wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...

I have been the Survivor Assistance Officer for my share of casualties.

Not one
has ever had the idea that their son's remains be met at the CONUS arrival
facility by the President. If it's such a big shortcoming, why hasn't the

Senate
minority leader, Daschle, made the trip to Dover? Is he being

disrespectful? He
isn't the President, or CinC, but so what? He considers himself to be a

very
important person with much higher standing than the President.


We're not talking about the asshole in office never attending a single
funeral, we're talking about the systematic hiding of casualties and the
poor treatment the people who've been injured in Iraq are receiving.

Our heros are second class citizens whose benefits, pay and basic humane
treatment (such as bullet proof vests) are overlooked or purposely denied by
this administration.

Shame on all of us for letting this happen.



It's part of the Bush program of hiding from the public and hiding from
the media so the tough questions aren't asked.

We can't have the presidential doofus put on the spot, after all.

--
Email sent to will never reach me.



  #6   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT I am ashamed

DSK wrote:
So JohnH, I assume (from something in one of your post a while back) that you were in the military.


JohnH wrote:
Yes, I was.


.....You think it's great to have a CinC who turns his back on
military casualties?


The President is not "turning his back on military casualties".


Oh, I see. What do you call it when he refuses to acknowledge them, much less to attend ceremonials in their honor?

... This
is a great example of tripe developed by libs.


Yes yes, of course.


No one could reasonably expect
the President to welcome every plane that arrives at Dover carrying wounded or
deceased military. He does have a few other things to do.


Agreed.

So how come he doesn't greet even ONE plane? Or at least acknowledge them from his busy busy desk?

DSK

  #7   Report Post  
JohnH
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT I am ashamed

On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 18:12:32 -0500, DSK wrote:

DSK wrote:
So JohnH, I assume (from something in one of your post a while back) that you were in the military.


JohnH wrote:
Yes, I was.


.....You think it's great to have a CinC who turns his back on
military casualties?


The President is not "turning his back on military casualties".


Oh, I see. What do you call it when he refuses to acknowledge them, much less to attend ceremonials in their honor?

... This
is a great example of tripe developed by libs.


Yes yes, of course.


No one could reasonably expect
the President to welcome every plane that arrives at Dover carrying wounded or
deceased military. He does have a few other things to do.


Agreed.

So how come he doesn't greet even ONE plane? Or at least acknowledge them from his busy busy desk?

DSK


He acknowledges them every time he speaks. Your comments are bordering on, nay,
have become ridiculous.


John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
  #8   Report Post  
jps
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT I am ashamed

"JohnH" wrote in message
news
He acknowledges them every time he speaks. Your comments are bordering on,

nay,
have become ridiculous.


He avoids it like the plague. He didn't have the balls to serve out his
term in the military and he doesn't have the balls to step up and take the
heat for the death of our fathers and sons in Iraq.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017