Amazing ...
 

On 3/28/20 2:11 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:37:07 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 3/27/20 11:28 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/27/2020 11:20 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 11:11 AM, Tim wrote:
Mr. Luddite
- hide quoted text -
On 3/27/2020 11:03 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 10:58 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/27/2020 10:28 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


It didn't take a Chinese hyper-sonic cruise missile
to put a US aircraft carrier out of commission.

All it took was a virus.


Does it matter? We should scrap at least half the navy and stop
wasting money on big new ships.


It does cause one to realize how vulnerable we may be everywhere
to biological warfare.





We're not about to get into a shooting war with a nuclear power and the
terrorists around the world aren't stymied by their comrades being
killed en masse, so what's the point? These ships are vulnerable.

Better we should build more hospital ships and dispatch them where
needed around the world. We'd be spending far less and building good
will.


You don't seem to understand what an aircraft carrier and the task
forces they operate with are for. “

Honestly, I doubt he cares to know


Which of our enemies with missiles and nukes are going to be deterred
by aircraft carriers?

Any smart enemy knows now that all it has to do is unleash a
biological weapon in a half dozen U.S. cities to bring us to our knees.


I am just very thankful that people like yourself have no part in
determining what our National Defense policies should be.


Quack quack quack.

You selling Aflac now? I guess a gig's a gig if you can't ride the
bus. ;-)


I'm not sure the Keller bus is even running and, in fact, I haven't been
on it in a long, long time. I prefer driving up to the Metro station or,
if it is past rush hour, driving in to DC. The two clients there I visit
have their own under the building parking garages so I park there for
free, instead of paying the $35.

Amazing ...
 

On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:16:03 -0400, John wrote:

On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:21:29 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 3/27/2020 1:36 PM, John wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:25:55 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 3/27/2020 11:14 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 11:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/27/2020 11:03 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 10:58 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/27/2020 10:28 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


It didn't take a Chinese hyper-sonic cruise missile
to put a US aircraft carrier out of commission.

All it took was a virus.


Does it matter? We should scrap at least half the navy and stop
wasting money on big new ships.


It does cause one to realize how vulnerable we may be everywhere
to biological warfare.





We're not about to get into a shooting war with a nuclear power and
the terrorists around the world aren't stymied by their comrades
being killed en masse, so what's the point? These ships are vulnerable.

Better we should build more hospital ships and dispatch them where
needed around the world. We'd be spending far less and building good
will.


You don't seem to understand what an aircraft carrier and the task
forces they operate with are for.

They are a mobile extension of our ability to defend the USA
globally.

They are not to go fight a nuclear war.


Defend us from who? The Russians, the Chinese? The North Koreans?
Nuclear powers? Venezuela?



Anybody who poses a threat, regardless of where they are or who they
are.

It's a unique capability that no other nation has and many
depend on ... via our NATO agreements.



According to liberals, like Harry, no other nations pose a threat to the US.
Russia and China are not spending money on weapons. Or are they?

Of course they are. China is the world's second largest defense spender
and is a major arms exporter. Some of the weapons technology is more
advanced than ours.

and according to Defense News:

"Russian defense budget remains the third largest in the world, dwarfing
the military expenditures of most European states combined."

I wonder why? You reckon they just like having them?

It is a jobs program for them too.
Without their defense program, nobody would be going into space. We
haven't had that capability since the last Shuttle flew. (2011)
We wasted so much money on Carter's "Space Truck" that there wasn't
enough left over for any kind of follow on program.

Amazing ...
 

wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:36:38 -0400, John wrote:

On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:25:55 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 3/27/2020 11:14 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 11:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/27/2020 11:03 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 10:58 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/27/2020 10:28 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


It didn't take a Chinese hyper-sonic cruise missile
to put a US aircraft carrier out of commission.

All it took was a virus.


Does it matter? We should scrap at least half the navy and stop
wasting money on big new ships.


It does cause one to realize how vulnerable we may be everywhere
to biological warfare.





We're not about to get into a shooting war with a nuclear power and
the terrorists around the world aren't stymied by their comrades
being killed en masse, so what's the point? These ships are vulnerable.

Better we should build more hospital ships and dispatch them where
needed around the world. We'd be spending far less and building good
will.


You don't seem to understand what an aircraft carrier and the task
forces they operate with are for.

They are a mobile extension of our ability to defend the USA
globally.

They are not to go fight a nuclear war.


Defend us from who? The Russians, the Chinese? The North Koreans?
Nuclear powers? Venezuela?



Anybody who poses a threat, regardless of where they are or who they
are.

It's a unique capability that no other nation has and many
depend on ... via our NATO agreements.

According to liberals, like Harry, no other nations pose a threat to the US.
Russia and China are not spending money on weapons. Or are they?

China seems to be stealing our designs more than spending money
creating their own.


Clinton even gave them guidance for missiles. Agreed to a launch to space
from China and the missile failed for reason and the remains were missing
the guidance system,

Amazing ...
 

On 3/28/2020 1:20 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:03:02 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 3/27/20 10:58 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/27/2020 10:28 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


It didn't take a Chinese hyper-sonic cruise missile
to put a US aircraft carrier out of commission.

All it took was a virus.


Does it matter? We should scrap at least half the navy and stop
wasting money on big new ships.


It does cause one to realize how vulnerable we may be everywhere
to biological warfare.





We're not about to get into a shooting war with a nuclear power and the
terrorists around the world aren't stymied by their comrades being
killed en masse, so what's the point? These ships are vulnerable.

Better we should build more hospital ships and dispatch them where
needed around the world. We'd be spending far less and building good will.

BTW where are all the TDS people who were telling us those hospital
ships were months away from being able to deploy?



That's something Harry would never understand.

When the plan to send the Comfort to NY came up, the Navy
and the yardbirds in Norfolk said the work being done would
take another month.

A direct order from the Commander in Chief changed all that.

Funny how that works.



--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

Amazing ...
 

On 3/28/2020 2:11 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:37:07 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 3/27/20 11:28 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/27/2020 11:20 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 11:11 AM, Tim wrote:
Mr. Luddite
- hide quoted text -
On 3/27/2020 11:03 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 10:58 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/27/2020 10:28 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


It didn't take a Chinese hyper-sonic cruise missile
to put a US aircraft carrier out of commission.

All it took was a virus.


Does it matter? We should scrap at least half the navy and stop
wasting money on big new ships.


It does cause one to realize how vulnerable we may be everywhere
to biological warfare.





We're not about to get into a shooting war with a nuclear power and the
terrorists around the world aren't stymied by their comrades being
killed en masse, so what's the point? These ships are vulnerable.

Better we should build more hospital ships and dispatch them where
needed around the world. We'd be spending far less and building good
will.


You don't seem to understand what an aircraft carrier and the task
forces they operate with are for. “

Honestly, I doubt he cares to know


Which of our enemies with missiles and nukes are going to be deterred
by aircraft carriers?

Any smart enemy knows now that all it has to do is unleash a
biological weapon in a half dozen U.S. cities to bring us to our knees.


I am just very thankful that people like yourself have no part in
determining what our National Defense policies should be.


Quack quack quack.

You selling Aflac now? I guess a gig's a gig if you can't ride the
bus. ;-)



LOL! That there is funny!



--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

Amazing ...
 

On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 14:17:10 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 3/28/20 2:11 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:37:07 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 3/27/20 11:28 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/27/2020 11:20 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 11:11 AM, Tim wrote:
Mr. Luddite
- hide quoted text -
On 3/27/2020 11:03 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 10:58 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/27/2020 10:28 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 10:10 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


It didn't take a Chinese hyper-sonic cruise missile
to put a US aircraft carrier out of commission.

All it took was a virus.


Does it matter? We should scrap at least half the navy and stop
wasting money on big new ships.


It does cause one to realize how vulnerable we may be everywhere
to biological warfare.





We're not about to get into a shooting war with a nuclear power and the
terrorists around the world aren't stymied by their comrades being
killed en masse, so what's the point? These ships are vulnerable.

Better we should build more hospital ships and dispatch them where
needed around the world. We'd be spending far less and building good
will.


You don't seem to understand what an aircraft carrier and the task
forces they operate with are for. “

Honestly, I doubt he cares to know


Which of our enemies with missiles and nukes are going to be deterred
by aircraft carriers?

Any smart enemy knows now that all it has to do is unleash a
biological weapon in a half dozen U.S. cities to bring us to our knees.


I am just very thankful that people like yourself have no part in
determining what our National Defense policies should be.


Quack quack quack.

You selling Aflac now? I guess a gig's a gig if you can't ride the
bus. ;-)


I'm not sure the Keller bus is even running and, in fact, I haven't been
on it in a long, long time. I prefer driving up to the Metro station or,
if it is past rush hour, driving in to DC. The two clients there I visit
have their own under the building parking garages so I park there for
free, instead of paying the $35.

Suitland?
All of that is new since I lived there.

Amazing ...
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/27/20 11:03 AM, Tim wrote:
Keyser Soze
- show quoted text -
How so, exactly? Didn't we have enough on hand to defeat the tiny
countries? “

When you cobble equipment withÂ* canabalizedÂ* parts because budget
doesn’t allow for new, you have results like Operation Eagle Claw.
And that was a major turning point in Jimmys attempt for re-election


Bull****.

We don't need more warships, we need fewer, and fewer are easier to
maintain and budget parts for, too.

This country's infrastructure is crumbling, we have serious public
health issues, we have dozens of other problems. Spending more on the
military is not the solution.



If you paid taxes that might be relevant.Â* You have no voice.