Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do not recall Tripp getting on national tv, pointing her finger at us and
telling us an outright lie. I also do not recall her ever holding an elected office, especially that of POTUS. "Clams Canino" wrote in message news:OwRpb.79318$ao4.222930@attbi_s51... Tripp fingering Monica was slimy - Clinton fingering Monica only got the cigar slimy. Why do we need to split hairs? Slimy is slimy, and both sides got dirty on that mess. -W "Jim--" wrote in message ... "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... I see you condone private employee records passed around like popcorn. Oh, wait, only if done by leftists. Just like running to the authorities with conversations you secretly taped all the while a friend was confiding about a personal matter? That's a fine thing to do, as long as it damages the left? What Tripp did was as "immoral" as what Clinton did. LMAO!!!! Really? Perhaps in *your* world, wherever that may be. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What Tripp did was as "immoral" as what Clinton did.
LMAO!!!! Really? Perhaps in *your* world, wherever that may be. Absolutely. In my world, betraying a friend and violating a trusted confidence is as immoral as a married guy getting a blow job from other than his spouse. Don't even start swtiching to the "It isn't the blow job, it's the lie!" argument as far as Tripp is concerned. At the time she violated a friend's trust and confidence Clinton had not yet lied about the affair, and she had no way to know that he was going to. Do your friends and other people who might confide in you know that you feel this way? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... What Tripp did was as "immoral" as what Clinton did. LMAO!!!! Really? Perhaps in *your* world, wherever that may be. Absolutely. In my world, betraying a friend and violating a trusted confidence is as immoral as a married guy getting a blow job from other than his spouse. Don't even start swtiching to the "It isn't the blow job, it's the lie!" argument as far as Tripp is concerned. At the time she violated a friend's trust and confidence Clinton had not yet lied about the affair, and she had no way to know that he was going to. Do your friends and other people who might confide in you know that you feel this way? If one of my daughters friends was being sexually abused by the POTUS, I would certainly take the same course of action as Tripp did. Monica was a young impressionable intern taken in by the most powerful man in the World...all for his sexual gratification, then denying it ever happened. Clinton potentially put the US at risk by giving into his sexual desires. Think about it. Tripp did the right thing. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now Harry, Linda Tripp just didn't like *any* hanky panky in the White
House. It just didn't get the same coverage when it was Mr. Family Values himself. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...12/55616.shtml How dare you post such a link? Pure speculation! No Proof! Where are the color photos of bush? Rumors like this are simply left-wing propaganda designed to undermine our war in Iraq and hasten the day that the terrorist army conquers America! Republicans never have sex unless specifically trying to make a baby, and implying that the Commander in Chief, a Republican Commander in Chief no less, would ever be less than totally resolute in his marriage vows is a low down, dirty, socialist trick! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 14:15:22 +0000, Gould 0738 wrote:
Now Harry, Linda Tripp just didn't like *any* hanky panky in the White House. It just didn't get the same coverage when it was Mr. Family Values himself. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...12/55616.shtml How dare you post such a link? Pure speculation! No Proof! Where are the color photos of bush? Rumors like this are simply left-wing propaganda designed to undermine our war in Iraq and hasten the day that the terrorist army conquers America! Republicans never have sex unless specifically trying to make a baby, and implying that the Commander in Chief, a Republican Commander in Chief no less, would ever be less than totally resolute in his marriage vows is a low down, dirty, socialist trick! I sorry. I wouldn't of believed it myself, if it had been some left wing rag like the New York Times, but Newsmax . . . if just has to be true. |