kimber 1911 v. cz sp01
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:04:09 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/10/20 12:11 AM, wrote: On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 19:46:26 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/9/20 1:33 PM, Bill wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/9/20 8:33 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/9/2020 8:15 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/9/20 5:26 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/8/2020 8:00 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/8/20 4:19 PM, Justan Ohlphart wrote: While I was busy working for the president and then private * enterprise, you were draft dodging, blowing through your * inheritance, stuffing your mama into n old age home, acumilating * tax leins, setting yourself up to declare bankruptcy multiple * times, scemeing to live free in a house at the banks expense, * finding a young innocent girl to support you in your old age * after you abandoned your wife and kids. Have I forgotten any of * your dastardly deeds? You Trumpsters just don't understand the military oath some of you took. You never worked for the president... "I, Justin the Stupid, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same..." The rest of the oath says you will obey the commands of the POTUS and officers, but it does not say or imply you work for the POTUS...you dumb ****. The rest of your oft-repeated screed is also mostly bull**** made up in your subpar little mind. "...n...acumilating...leins...scemeing...banks ... You can't even put a sentence together. By the way, how's work release and that ankle monitor working for your kids? It really is funny and a bit ironic to see Harry lecturing those who served in the military what their oath meant. But matter not.* Harry's wrong anyway.* As Commander in Chief the POTUS is at the top of the command chain and therefore *everyone* serving in the military is ultimately responsible to ... and works for ... the POTUS. Makes one wonder Who's the dumb ****? I know precision in language doesn't count here. I wonder if you might point out in the Constitution, the U.S. Code, or any other official document of the United States where it says all military personnel work "for" the POTUS. While POTUS Pig Vomit may fire an officer from his staff, that doesn't mean the officer was fired from the military. My understanding is that Lt. Col. Vindman was reassigned to the Pentagon after Trump "fired him" from the White House staff. He still has, unless he quits, his job as a military officer. It's all just another example of Trump's gross dishonesty and incompetency for the office he holds. The institution of the military is not happy with Trump's outrageous behavior in this and other matters. Why do you think it needs to be spelled out for you in the Constitution that military members, according to the chain of command, ultimately are responsible to the Commander in Chief ... meaning the POTUS? I can assure you that this is drilled into the heads of every service member. I think you are confusing a corporate organizational chart in a small time newspaper with that of a military chain of command. Now you display your lack of knowledge (or understanding) of what happened to Vindman.* He had been assigned to the White House by the Pentagon as a member of the White House National Security Counsel staff. He was not "fired".* He was relieved of those duties by Trump as Commander in Chief (an action he is totally authorized to do) and reassigned back to the Pentagon. Your lack of precision in what you write contributes to your demonstrated ignorance regarding the military. The issue was whether military officers work "for" the POTUS. They do if they are on his staff, but all he can do is "fire them" from his staff, as he did with Vindman. Military personnel work for the government and people of the United States. Who did you work for at the Kansas cIty Star? The stockholders or the guy you reported too? That's a far more interesting question than you can imagine. The day I started I literally was the lowest man on the totem pole in the news department, so I reported directly to the city and assistant city editors, the assignment editors, and all of them and reporters who had been there two years and the departmental chiefs in the editorial departments became stockholders. After two years, I became a stockholder, too, and by then I only reported to the assignment editor and the city editor. Then I joined the copy desk and worked it when my writing assignments for the day were met, so in that capacity, I reported to the copy chief and the world news editor. By then I had worked my way up the seniority list by about 14 places. But I never worked for any of the editors there...I simply reported to them. And anyone of them could have canned you. One of them, probably did. Wow...you've really gone over the edge. Except for the college summer interns, which I started out as, the reporters had all previously worked at smaller papers and had worked their way up to The Star, which, in those days was one of the best papers in the country. I cannot recall that any reporter or editor was fired in the years I was there. Some moved on to bigger papers in other cities. There was one photographer who should have been fired for excessive drinking, but he was just fabulous with his cameras and got pictures it is unlikely anyone else could have taken. The first night I was allowed out of the city room after three months of writing obits and rewrites, I was in a newsmobile with the guy and he stopped off at a bar and told me to man the radio. About 10 minutes later a call came in from the city editor, who wanted to know where we were. Hell, I didn't know. I mumbled and the city editor laughed and told me to have the photographer radio in when he got out of the bar. I had a wonderful career there and only left when I was recruited by The Associated Press. In point of fact, I was recruited by Harry F. Rosenthal, who, back then, was *the* top national news reporter at The AP. He had told Wes Gallagher, then the general manager of The AP, that I was a "good prospect," and Rosenthal was given the assignment of recruiting me. I suppose things were much the same at IBM, eh? https://is.gd/aUPA3Y Harry, Donnie isn't here. Lies are meaningless to the rest of us. -- Freedom Isn't Free! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com