Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Seems everyday another Democrat throws his or her hat in the ring, declaring they are a candidate for POTUS. The most recent is Rep. Seth Moulton (D-MA). I live in MA and have never heard of him. Is running for the nomination a serious goal or is it just something to add to resume's? Many of these declared candidates don't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being nominated. Or is it a financial investment? Left over campaign contributions after a run for a nomination or office technically cannot be used for personal use however the rules that define personal use are full of loopholes. If a relative of the candidate was officially "hired" to work in the campaign efforts, the expense of his/her salary is considered ok to pay. Plus, during the campaign all the travel expenses, dinners, etc, are part of the reimbursable expenses. Losing candidates *are* allowed to funnel excess campaign contributions to other candidates or to their party's general funds. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 07:25:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
Seems everyday another Democrat throws his or her hat in the ring, declaring they are a candidate for POTUS. The most recent is Rep. Seth Moulton (D-MA). I live in MA and have never heard of him. Is running for the nomination a serious goal or is it just something to add to resume's? Many of these declared candidates don't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being nominated. Or is it a financial investment? Left over campaign contributions after a run for a nomination or office technically cannot be used for personal use however the rules that define personal use are full of loopholes. If a relative of the candidate was officially "hired" to work in the campaign efforts, the expense of his/her salary is considered ok to pay. Plus, during the campaign all the travel expenses, dinners, etc, are part of the reimbursable expenses. Losing candidates *are* allowed to funnel excess campaign contributions to other candidates or to their party's general funds. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com Looks like it would be a good way to save on food costs if nothing else. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 07:25:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: Seems everyday another Democrat throws his or her hat in the ring, declaring they are a candidate for POTUS. The most recent is Rep. Seth Moulton (D-MA). I live in MA and have never heard of him. Is running for the nomination a serious goal or is it just something to add to resume's? Many of these declared candidates don't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being nominated. Or is it a financial investment? Left over campaign contributions after a run for a nomination or office technically cannot be used for personal use however the rules that define personal use are full of loopholes. If a relative of the candidate was officially "hired" to work in the campaign efforts, the expense of his/her salary is considered ok to pay. Plus, during the campaign all the travel expenses, dinners, etc, are part of the reimbursable expenses. Losing candidates *are* allowed to funnel excess campaign contributions to other candidates or to their party's general funds. If nothing else he can use it all for his congressional reelection but I agree, the law is full of loopholes that allow him to spend this money for almost anything. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|