Abrogate the 14th?
 

POTUS Pig Vomit wants to kill the 14th Amendment, the one that says:

"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States
and of the State wherein they reside."

You just know that Orange Asshole has never read the Constitution and if
he does ever read it, he won't understand it.

Abrogate the 14th?
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
POTUS Pig Vomit wants to kill the 14th Amendment, the one that says:

"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
States and of the State wherein they reside."

You just know that Orange Asshole has never read the Constitution and
if he does ever read it, he won't understand it.

They are, but their parents aren't, Fat Harry.

Abrogate the 14th?
 

On 10/30/2018 7:49 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
POTUS Pig Vomit wants to kill the 14th Amendment, theÂ* one that says:

"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
States and of the State wherein they reside."

You just know that Orange Asshole has never read the Constitution and
if heÂ* does ever read it, heÂ* won't understand it.

They are, but their parents aren't, Fat Harry.


Harry doesn't understand it either. There's more to this birthright
issue than what he'd like to believe in his simple minded, narrow
point of view.

Abrogate the 14th?
 

Mr. Luddite
- show quoted text -
Harry doesn't understand it either. There's more to this birthright
issue than what he'd like to believe in his simple minded, narrow
point of view.
........


It’d probably be safe to say that his cats know more about politics than he does.

Abrogate the 14th?
 

Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/30/2018 7:49 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
POTUS Pig Vomit wants to kill the 14th Amendment, theÂ* one that says:

"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
States and of the State wherein they reside."

You just know that Orange Asshole has never read the Constitution and
if heÂ* does ever read it, heÂ* won't understand it.

They are, but their parents aren't, Fat Harry.


Harry doesn't understand it either. There's more to this birthright
issue than what he'd like to believe in his simple minded, narrow
point of view.


Were they subject to the jurisdiction when they were born? The parents
were here illegally, so what about the subject part?

Abrogate the 14th?
 

On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 8:58:25 PM UTC-4, Tim wrote:
Mr. Luddite
- show quoted text -
Harry doesn't understand it either. There's more to this birthright
issue than what he'd like to believe in his simple minded, narrow
point of view.
.......


It’d probably be safe to say that his cats know more about politics than he does.

Funny how the left says the Constitution is a living, breathing document until someone on the right wants to change it.

Abrogate the 14th?
 

On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:10:33 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

POTUS Pig Vomit wants to kill the 14th Amendment, the one that says:

"???Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States
and of the State wherein they reside."

You just know that Orange Asshole has never read the Constitution and if
he does ever read it, he won't understand it.

Trump is not the first one to question what "Under the jurisdiction of
the US" really means. I heard it discussed in the 90s when Clinton was
on the anti immigration bandwagon and it has popped up a number of
times since then. The question is whether an "illegal" who is here
under a false identity or living in the underground economy and
unknown to the government is really under their jurisdiction. I agree
it is really fine slicing the words but there have been constitutional
cases land at the SCOTUS with less.
It is like the world series, I really do not have a dog in the fight,
I am not really watching but I will look to see it came out.
Maybe they should have been asking Kavanaugh more about immigration
than whether he groped a girl when he was a teenager.

Abrogate the 14th?
 

wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:10:33 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

POTUS Pig Vomit wants to kill the 14th Amendment, the one that says:

"???Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States
and of the State wherein they reside."

You just know that Orange Asshole has never read the Constitution and if
he does ever read it, he won't understand it.

Trump is not the first one to question what "Under the jurisdiction of
the US" really means. I heard it discussed in the 90s when Clinton was
on the anti immigration bandwagon and it has popped up a number of
times since then. The question is whether an "illegal" who is here
under a false identity or living in the underground economy and
unknown to the government is really under their jurisdiction. I agree
it is really fine slicing the words but there have been constitutional
cases land at the SCOTUS with less.
It is like the world series, I really do not have a dog in the fight,
I am not really watching but I will look to see it came out.
Maybe they should have been asking Kavanaugh more about immigration
than whether he groped a girl when he was a teenager.


As Harry states, words have meaning.

Abrogate the 14th?
 

On 10/30/18 10:09 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:10:33 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

POTUS Pig Vomit wants to kill the 14th Amendment, the one that says:

"???Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States
and of the State wherein they reside."

You just know that Orange Asshole has never read the Constitution and if
he does ever read it, he won't understand it.

Trump is not the first one to question what "Under the jurisdiction of
the US" really means. I heard it discussed in the 90s when Clinton was
on the anti immigration bandwagon and it has popped up a number of
times since then.

Did Clinton suggest abrogating the 14th via Executive Order?

You consistently miss the forest to bite on a tree.

Abrogate the 14th?
 

On 10/31/2018 6:43 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/30/18 10:09 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:10:33 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

POTUS Pig Vomit wants to kill the 14th Amendment, theÂ* one that says:

"???Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States
and of the State wherein they reside."

You just know that Orange Asshole has never read the Constitution and if
heÂ* does ever read it, heÂ* won't understand it.

Trump is not the first one to question what "Under the jurisdiction of
the US" really means. I heard it discussed in the 90s when Clinton was
on the anti immigration bandwagon and it has popped up a number of
times since then.


Did Clinton suggest abrogating the 14th via Executive Order?



No, but Senator Harry Reid argued against birthright citizenship
until Nancy Pelosi hit him upside the head.