Deadbeats have no right
 

On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:38:33 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote:

Say what!
Y'all get to deduct your property and state taxes when doing federal tax?
No wonder y'all run around with over bloated trucks and campers.

If your camper is nice enough it can be a second home (boat too) and
you get to write off the interest on the loan.
None of that helps me tho. No state tax and I don't owe any money.

Deadbeats have no right
 

On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 18:57:37 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 6:56 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:12:12 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 4:25 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:24:29 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 1:13 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:48:40 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 12:43 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 10/4/18 12:16 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:52:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 11:03 AM, wrote:

* I don't have any problems with atheism. It certainly is more logical
than religious beliefs.

Your atheism is as offensive to most people as religion is to you and
your cohorts certainly make plenty of public displays on public
property about it during your protests.
It has become a religion as much as any other.

I also reject the idea that you attending some tertiary institution
for a few years five decades ago makes you any smarter than me., You
have not seemed to learn much since.


I've never said I was smarter than you. You're regressing into your
projections *again*.

You go out of your way to try to insult me just about every day.

To what protests of mine are you referring?

The people with signs and other props on public property protesting
just about anything remotely considered religious.



1. Likewise, but I've never claimed to be "smarter" than you. Stop
projecting.

2. Those aren't protests of mine. The last "protest" I attended was one
"favoring" the candidacy of Sarah Palin, and that was only to look at
the misspelled signs.




Not so. Remember the pink hat you wore and probably still wear.
What was that occasion?


I wasn't protesting. I was supporting women.

Uh Huh. Nice diversion. It was an anti Trump protest, no matter what
you rationalize away.
The only woman you were really supporting was Hillary and the fact
that you never accepted her loss.
Look at the bright side. In 25 months you can do it all again.


Your imagining what others are thinking just never ends. It's absurd.

This only had to do with what you just said and what you did. You said
you were not protesting yet you showed up at an anti trump protest and
even put on the pussy hat. (assuming that wasn't a lie)

I showed up to support my female friends and women in general.

Support them in what? The protest they were staging.
If quibbling was a university course of study you would have a phD

That is a protest and you were there. You were either a protestor or a
useless appendage. I accept either answer.

Deadbeats have no right
 

Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 10/4/18 1:43 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/4/2018 12:32 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/4/18 12:16 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:52:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 11:03 AM, wrote:

* I don't have any problems with atheism. It certainly is more
logical
than religious beliefs.

Your atheism is as offensive to most people as religion is to you and
your cohorts certainly make plenty of public displays on public
property about it during your protests.
It has become a religion as much as any other.

I also reject the idea that you attending some tertiary institution
for a few years five decades ago makes you any smarter than me., You
have not seemed to learn much since.


I've never said I was smarter than you. You're regressing into your
projections *again*.

You go out of your way to try to insult me just about every day.

To what protests of mine are you referring?

The people with signs and other props on public property protesting
just about anything remotely considered religious.



1. Likewise, but I've never claimed to be "smarter" than you. Stop
projecting.

2. Those aren't protests of mine. The last "protest" I attended was
one "favoring" the candidacy of Sarah Palin, and that was only to look
at the misspelled signs.



and her legs.



I never for a New York minute thought Palin was physically attractive.


We need a short list of the women you find physically attractive.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Deadbeats have no right
 

On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 20:30:43 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 10/4/18 1:43 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/4/2018 12:32 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/4/18 12:16 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:52:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 11:03 AM, wrote:

* I don't have any problems with atheism. It certainly is more
logical
than religious beliefs.

Your atheism is as offensive to most people as religion is to you and
your cohorts certainly make plenty of public displays on public
property about it during your protests.
It has become a religion as much as any other.

I also reject the idea that you attending some tertiary institution
for a few years five decades ago makes you any smarter than me., You
have not seemed to learn much since.


I've never said I was smarter than you. You're regressing into your
projections *again*.

You go out of your way to try to insult me just about every day.

To what protests of mine are you referring?

The people with signs and other props on public property protesting
just about anything remotely considered religious.



1. Likewise, but I've never claimed to be "smarter" than you. Stop
projecting.

2. Those aren't protests of mine. The last "protest" I attended was
one "favoring" the candidacy of Sarah Palin, and that was only to look
at the misspelled signs.



and her legs.



I never for a New York minute thought Palin was physically attractive.


We need a short list of the women you find physically attractive.

He like Hillary, Nancy, Maxine and Dianne from what we can tell.

Deadbeats have no right
 

On 10/4/18 8:38 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 20:30:43 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 10/4/18 1:43 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/4/2018 12:32 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/4/18 12:16 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:52:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 11:03 AM, wrote:

* I don't have any problems with atheism. It certainly is more
logical
than religious beliefs.

Your atheism is as offensive to most people as religion is to you and
your cohorts certainly make plenty of public displays on public
property about it during your protests.
It has become a religion as much as any other.

I also reject the idea that you attending some tertiary institution
for a few years five decades ago makes you any smarter than me., You
have not seemed to learn much since.


I've never said I was smarter than you. You're regressing into your
projections *again*.

You go out of your way to try to insult me just about every day.

To what protests of mine are you referring?

The people with signs and other props on public property protesting
just about anything remotely considered religious.



1. Likewise, but I've never claimed to be "smarter" than you. Stop
projecting.

2. Those aren't protests of mine. The last "protest" I attended was
one "favoring" the candidacy of Sarah Palin, and that was only to look
at the misspelled signs.



and her legs.



I never for a New York minute thought Palin was physically attractive.


We need a short list of the women you find physically attractive.

He like Hillary, Nancy, Maxine and Dianne from what we can tell.


There you go again, projecting your ignorance.

Deadbeats have no right
 

On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 08:09:36 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/3/18 10:29 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 21:26:13 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

The reports I've seen indicate otherwise, in the IRS all over the
Trumps' ass.

He gets audited every year if that is what you mean but I have not
heard much about judgements against him. You aren't serious about
saying the IRS is suddenly interested in things that happened in the
1950s, 60s and 70s (that this article describes) are you?


Never said or implied that, Mr. Debater.


Well then mr professional writer what is "the IRS all over the
Trumps' ass." supposed to imply?


I keep forgetting that irony and abstractions are lost on you.

===

The supreme irony here is that *you* are complaining about someone
else's tax issues.

Deadbeats have no right
 

Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 10/4/18 4:25 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:24:29 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 1:13 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:48:40 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 12:43 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 10/4/18 12:16 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:52:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 11:03 AM, wrote:

* I don't have any problems with atheism. It certainly is more logical
than religious beliefs.

Your atheism is as offensive to most people as religion is to you and
your cohorts certainly make plenty of public displays on public
property about it during your protests.
It has become a religion as much as any other.

I also reject the idea that you attending some tertiary institution
for a few years five decades ago makes you any smarter than me., You
have not seemed to learn much since.


I've never said I was smarter than you. You're regressing into your
projections *again*.

You go out of your way to try to insult me just about every day.

To what protests of mine are you referring?

The people with signs and other props on public property protesting
just about anything remotely considered religious.



1. Likewise, but I've never claimed to be "smarter" than you. Stop
projecting.

2. Those aren't protests of mine. The last "protest" I attended was one
"favoring" the candidacy of Sarah Palin, and that was only to look at
the misspelled signs.




Not so. Remember the pink hat you wore and probably still wear.
What was that occasion?


I wasn't protesting. I was supporting women.

Uh Huh. Nice diversion. It was an anti Trump protest, no matter what
you rationalize away.
The only woman you were really supporting was Hillary and the fact
that you never accepted her loss.
Look at the bright side. In 25 months you can do it all again.


Your imagining what others are thinking just never ends. It's absurd.

This only had to do with what you just said and what you did. You said
you were not protesting yet you showed up at an anti trump protest and
even put on the pussy hat. (assuming that wasn't a lie)

I showed up to support my female friends and women in general.



Much to your surprise you ended up in the middle of a protest. Ya
right.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Deadbeats have no right
 

On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 20:39:02 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 8:38 PM, wrote:

We need a short list of the women you find physically attractive.

He like Hillary, Nancy, Maxine and Dianne from what we can tell.


There you go again, projecting your ignorance.

You seem to be the one projecting now. I just said "from what we can
tell" and that is accurate.

Deadbeats have no right
 

True North wrote:
Say what!
Y'all get to deduct your property and state taxes when doing federal tax?
No wonder y'all run around with over bloated trucks and campers.


Sucks to be a Canadian taxpayer, eh?

Deadbeats have no right
 

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 10/4/18 6:56 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:12:12 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 4:25 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 13:24:29 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 1:13 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:48:40 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 12:43 PM, justan wrote:
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 10/4/18 12:16 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:52:23 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 10/4/18 11:03 AM, wrote:

* I don't have any problems with atheism. It certainly is more logical
than religious beliefs.

Your atheism is as offensive to most people as religion is to you and
your cohorts certainly make plenty of public displays on public
property about it during your protests.
It has become a religion as much as any other.

I also reject the idea that you attending some tertiary institution
for a few years five decades ago makes you any smarter than me., You
have not seemed to learn much since.


I've never said I was smarter than you. You're regressing into your
projections *again*.

You go out of your way to try to insult me just about every day.

To what protests of mine are you referring?

The people with signs and other props on public property protesting
just about anything remotely considered religious.



1. Likewise, but I've never claimed to be "smarter" than you. Stop
projecting.

2. Those aren't protests of mine. The last "protest" I attended was one
"favoring" the candidacy of Sarah Palin, and that was only to look at
the misspelled signs.




Not so. Remember the pink hat you wore and probably still wear.
What was that occasion?


I wasn't protesting. I was supporting women.

Uh Huh. Nice diversion. It was an anti Trump protest, no matter what
you rationalize away.
The only woman you were really supporting was Hillary and the fact
that you never accepted her loss.
Look at the bright side. In 25 months you can do it all again.


Your imagining what others are thinking just never ends. It's absurd.

This only had to do with what you just said and what you did. You said
you were not protesting yet you showed up at an anti trump protest and
even put on the pussy hat. (assuming that wasn't a lie)

I showed up to support my female friends and women in general.

Support them in what? The protest they were staging.
If quibbling was a university course of study you would have a phD



I'm not going to enable your naivete.


You would but tossed in a High School debate with your skills.