| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Wow
Kavanaugh: temper tantrums, incessant drinking of water, snorting,
argues with and interrupts U.S. Senators, refuses to give straight answers to simple questions, dissembles, totally afraid of FBI queries... Trump certainly picks the best people. Unfortunately, they aren't being well-represented by Kavanaugh. And Lindsay Graham? Ever the sucker of Trump's dick. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow
On 9/27/2018 5:15 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
Kavanaugh: temper tantrums, incessant drinking of water, snorting, argues with and interrupts U.S. Senators, refuses to give straight answers to simple questions, dissembles, totally afraid of FBI queries... Trump certainly picks the best people. Unfortunately, they aren't being well-represented by Kavanaugh. And Lindsay Graham? Ever the sucker of Trump's dick. If it weren't so damaging and hurtful to other people this would be comical. During the recent break the talking heads on MSNBC were blaming the whole mess on Trump. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow
On 9/27/18 5:38 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 9/27/2018 5:15 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: Kavanaugh: temper tantrums, incessant drinking of water, snorting, argues with and interrupts U.S. Senators, refuses to give straight answers to simple questions, dissembles, totally afraid of FBI queries... Trump certainly picks the best people. Unfortunately, they aren't being well-represented by Kavanaugh. And Lindsay Graham? Ever the sucker of Trump's dick. If it weren't so damaging and hurtful to other people this would be comical. During the recent break the talking heads on MSNBC were blaming the whole mess on Trump. Well, we all know Trump picks the best. Just ask him. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
Kavanaugh: temper tantrums, incessant drinking of water, snorting, argues with and interrupts U.S. Senators, refuses to give straight answers to simple questions, dissembles, totally afraid of FBI queries... Trump certainly picks the best people. Unfortunately, they aren't being well-represented by Kavanaugh. And Lindsay Graham? Ever the sucker of Trump's dick. To his credit Kavanaugh didn't fall into the FBI trap. Smart fella. He'll be a great SC judge. -- x |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow
"Mr. Luddite" Wrote in message:
On 9/27/2018 5:15 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: Kavanaugh: temper tantrums, incessant drinking of water, snorting, argues with and interrupts U.S. Senators, refuses to give straight answers to simple questions, dissembles, totally afraid of FBI queries... Trump certainly picks the best people. Unfortunately, they aren't being well-represented by Kavanaugh. And Lindsay Graham? Ever the sucker of Trump's dick. If it weren't so damaging and hurtful to other people this would be comical. During the recent break the talking heads on MSNBC were blaming the whole mess on Trump. Of course. -- x |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:15:11 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: Kavanaugh: temper tantrums, incessant drinking of water, snorting, argues with and interrupts U.S. Senators, refuses to give straight answers to simple questions, dissembles, totally afraid of FBI queries... I just saw a man who was frustrated by the whole circus. He didn't say he was afraid of the FBI. He only indicated that he also understood this was simply trying to run out the clock. Even my wife, who is no Trump or Kavanaugh fan said "Since when does the person being investigated get to ask the FBI to investigate them"? Booker just looked stupid asking that question over and over. (certainly not "presidential" if that was where he was going) They did make a good point. If this was really about getting to the truth, why did Feinstein hold on to that for 60 days and not bring it up in the confidential sessions of the vetting process. Also why didn't the senate democrats want to participate in the committee investigation. I hear Feinstein acting like she did not even know that was going on. This was nothing but a cheap political trick. I do bet, if Kavanaugh is damaged by this, it will see a court room where there will be a thorough investigation and more people testifying under oath. At that point Dr Ford will be in a lot more hostile environment as the defendant. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow
|
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow
On 9/27/2018 9:15 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/27/18 8:53 PM, wrote: On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:15:11 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: Kavanaugh: temper tantrums, incessant drinking of water, snorting, argues with and interrupts U.S. Senators, refuses to give straight answers to simple questions, dissembles, totally afraid of FBI queries... I just saw a man who was frustrated by the whole circus. He didn't say he was afraid of the FBI. He only indicated that he also understood this was simply trying to run out the clock. Even my wife, who is no Trump or Kavanaugh fan said "Since when does the person being investigated get to ask the FBI to investigate them"? Booker just looked stupid asking that question over and over. (certainly not "presidential" if that was where he was going) They did make a good point. If this was really about getting to the truth, why did Feinstein hold on to that for 60 days and not bring it up in the confidential sessions of the vetting process. Also why didn't the senate democrats want to participate in the committee investigation. I hear Feinstein acting like she did not even know that was going on. This was nothing but a cheap political trick. I do bet, if Kavanaugh is damaged by this, it will see a court room where there will be a thorough investigation and more people testifying under oath. At that point Dr Ford will be in a lot more hostile environment as the defendant. Do you think Dr. Ford will be subject to libel or slander because of her testimony? I would think Congressional testimony is protected by absolute privilege. As for Kavanaugh, he demonstrated he is a man out of control, and unsuitable for the bench in any position. The purpose of the FBI inquiry in this case would be to investigate questions and obtain information that no one has, and get it from people who are under oath. The Repubs and Kavanaugh are scared ****less of what might be turned up. It's amazing to me how two sides can have totally different views or conclusions regarding this whole mess. The way I see it the strategy of the Dems was to delay, delay, delay hoping to push this off until after the midterms with hopes of gaining control in Congress. It's politics, but as each of the delaying tactics ran their course and a confirmation vote became eminent, the Dems dug deeper into their delaying tactics eventually getting close to the bottom of the barrel and the anti-Kavanaugh sleaze campaign was all that was left. If the Dems had been able to block Kavanaugh's confirmation prior to Ford's letter becoming public, we would never had heard of it. I agree with my wife's opinion about Ford. She comes across as a troubled woman possibly with issues that are not related to the Kavanaugh issue. Just a guess but she seems very insecure for someone with an advanced degree (PhD) in psychiatry, a university professor who should be very comfortable in public appearances and ... is well traveled in airplanes. Somethings just don't add up. I asked my wife if, as a woman, she thought that the claims of a "sexual assault" as Ford described it while in HS, at a party that involved drinking and in which no actual rape occurred, would be an experience that would cause a life-long trauma in a woman. My wife said no way. That's all I can go by as a male. I also wonder if Ford's decision to write the letter to Feinstein was something she did completely on her own when she learned of Kavanaugh's nomination or did she communicate privately with friends or associates who encouraged her to contact Feinstein. I can't remember if that question was asked of her. I know it's cynical but Ford is a university professor in California, a breeding ground for progressive liberal obstructionism to anything Trump. I agree that both her testimony of what she thinks happened and Kavanaugh's defense of himself were credible. Call it a tie. The tie breaker therefore is which of the two were able to provide credible evidence that backed up their stories. In that case Kavanaugh won hands down. He should be confirmed and put this whole mess behind us before the sleazy campaign orchestrated by the Democrats becomes the norm for future debates. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow
On 9/28/2018 8:47 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote: It's amazing to me how two sides can have totally different views or conclusions regarding this whole mess. The way I see it the strategy of the Dems was to delay, delay, delay hoping to push this off until after the midterms with hopes of gaining control in Congress. It's politics, but as each of the delaying tactics ran their course and a confirmation vote became eminent, the Dems dug deeper into their delaying tactics eventually getting close to the bottom of the barrel and the anti-Kavanaugh sleaze campaign was all that was left. If the Dems had been able to block Kavanaugh's confirmation prior to Ford's letter becoming public, we would never had heard of it. I agree with my wife's opinion about Ford. She comes across as a troubled woman possibly with issues that are not related to the Kavanaugh issue. Just a guess but she seems very insecure for someone with an advanced degree (PhD) in psychiatry, a university professor who should be very comfortable in public appearances and ... is well traveled in airplanes. Somethings just don't add up. I asked my wife if, as a woman, she thought that the claims of a "sexual assault" as Ford described it while in HS, at a party that involved drinking and in which no actual rape occurred, would be an experience that would cause a life-long trauma in a woman. My wife said no way. That's all I can go by as a male. I also wonder if Ford's decision to write the letter to Feinstein was something she did completely on her own when she learned of Kavanaugh's nomination or did she communicate privately with friends or associates who encouraged her to contact Feinstein. I can't remember if that question was asked of her. I know it's cynical but Ford is a university professor in California, a breeding ground for progressive liberal obstructionism to anything Trump. I agree that both her testimony of what she thinks happened and Kavanaugh's defense of himself were credible. Call it a tie. The tie breaker therefore is which of the two were able to provide credible evidence that backed up their stories. In that case Kavanaugh won hands down. He should be confirmed and put this whole mess behind us before the sleazy campaign orchestrated by the Democrats becomes the norm for future debates. Kavanaugh is a lying, short-tempered, sexually aggressive and either former or current drunk and is perfectly suited as a Trump nominee who will be seated because the Repubs went totally tribal to protect him. My post started with: "It's amazing to me how two sides can have totally different views or conclusions regarding this whole mess." Your response only confirms what I said except your's is based simply on a prejudiced political opinion whereas mine had some backup to it. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
