| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#18
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
How many here ....
On 9/27/2018 8:44 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 9/27/18 7:42 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 9/27/2018 7:31 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Mr. Luddite wrote: Which, of course, is the whole purpose of the current bull**** campaign going on orchestrated by your party. You think the revelations about Kavsnaugh are B.S.? How very Republican of you. Kavanaugh is a deeply flawed man, that much is clear.* His part in the Starr investigation is ironic now that the shoe is on the other foot.* He is simply reaping what he's sown. Of course to Luddite, it's all "unfair."* Snowflakes all. It's a given that they blame the Dems for all their sins. It's all Pelosi's fault!* It's Schumer's fault! Crybabies. "Snowflakes" and "Crybabies" are terms that referred to the progressive liberals, mostly in California, and was coined by those on the conservative side of the fence. In true dishonest behavior the left has now stolen those terms to describe their adversaries on the right.* Figures. Show me proof that Kavanaugh is "deeply flawed".* You can't. You've just joined the liberal bandwagon, repeating the same unified claims. I just mentioned to Harry ... if it were not Kavanaugh and Trump's choice of a nominee was another person of conservative leanings, I suspect we'd be witnessing a similar smear campaign. What *really* would be interesting is if Kavanaugh is rejected and Trump replaces him with a very conservative *woman* as his nominee. What will be the Dem's strategy then? As I have previously posted, there is no shortage of right-wing trash who appeal to Trump waiting in the wings. You didn't answer my question. What if he replaced Kavanaugh with an equally conservative woman as his nominee? How would your party smear her? |
![Mr. Luddite[_4_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Threaded Mode
