|
Usage of motoroil
"Joe" wrote in message . ..
I feel very very sorry for your daughter. It must be a terrible burden to have to live with a father such as yourself. Please provide any and all facts that support your above diatribe. A sampling of you posts in this thread alone provides ample proof. Hmm, then I guess, by your posts here, that one can assume a lot about you, too. 1. You are NOT, nor have ever been, an licensed engineer. 2. You found a .jpg of a A.S.E. certification to try to make yourself sound like you have some training in SOMETHING. 3. You are either young, simple, or have some issues like your mommy beating you, because you have this need to try to sound better than everybody else. 4. You don't have a boat (because you don't ever post about anything boating related) 5. You must have been a lousy mechanic, if your claim of being a communications TECHNICIAN hold any water. |
Usage of motoroil
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "Joe" wrote in message . .. I feel very very sorry for your daughter. It must be a terrible burden to have to live with a father such as yourself. Please provide any and all facts that support your above diatribe. A sampling of you posts in this thread alone provides ample proof. Hmm, then I guess, by your posts here, that one can assume a lot about you, too. 1. You are NOT, nor have ever been, an licensed engineer. I never said I was a P.E. I said I was a "Telecommunications Infrastructure Engineer", an RCDD, and a holder of a Florida Certified Low Voltage License. 2. You found a .jpg of a A.S.E. certification to try to make yourself sound like you have some training in SOMETHING. 3. You are either young, simple, or have some issues like your mommy beating you, because you have this need to try to sound better than everybody else. 4. You don't have a boat (because you don't ever post about anything boating related) An outright lie, which from you is expected. 5. You must have been a lousy mechanic, if your claim of being a communications TECHNICIAN hold any water. Sorry, not a Technician. I design, inspect, and project manage. I too feel sorry for your daughter. |
Usage of motoroil
|
Usage of motoroil
"Joe" wrote in message . ..
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "Joe" wrote in message . .. I feel very very sorry for your daughter. It must be a terrible burden to have to live with a father such as yourself. Please provide any and all facts that support your above diatribe. A sampling of you posts in this thread alone provides ample proof. Hmm, then I guess, by your posts here, that one can assume a lot about you, too. 1. You are NOT, nor have ever been, an licensed engineer. I never said I was a P.E. I said I was a "Telecommunications Infrastructure Engineer", an RCDD, and a holder of a Florida Certified Low Voltage License. Please see below: 43-15-30. Unlawful acts. (a) Any person who violates Code Section 43-15-7 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. (b) Any person presenting or attempting to use as his own the certificate of registration or the seal of another obtained under this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. (c) Any person who gives any false or forged evidence of any kind to the board or to any member thereof in obtaining a certificate or certificate of registration shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. (d) Any person who falsely impersonates any other registrant or any person who attempts to use an expired or revoked certificate of registration shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. (e) Each day or occurrence shall be considered a separate offense. (f) Any person offering services to the public who uses by name, verbal claim, sign, advertisement, directory listing, or letterhead the words "Engineer," "Engineers," "Professional Engineering," "Engineering," or "Engineered" shall be guilty of a misdemeanor unless said person has complied with the provisions of this chapter. 2. You found a .jpg of a A.S.E. certification to try to make yourself sound like you have some training in SOMETHING. 3. You are either young, simple, or have some issues like your mommy beating you, because you have this need to try to sound better than everybody else. 4. You don't have a boat (because you don't ever post about anything boating related) An outright lie, which from you is expected. Yes, I know you lied. 5. You must have been a lousy mechanic, if your claim of being a communications TECHNICIAN hold any water. Sorry, not a Technician. I design, inspect, and project manage. I too feel sorry for your daughter. I feel sorry for anybody associated with you. What a putz. |
Usage of motoroil
HEY!
You forgot where most of the oil goes- Past the exhaust valve. (but only on the exhaust stroke.) |
Usage of motoroil
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 23 Jul 2003 07:02:18 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message You should probably learn to read a little better. I said that the pressure against the top of the rings is less than the pressure in the cylinder. You've already stated that's impossible. But you were wrong yet again. Now you're finally starting to understand why you were wrong ... maybe. We'll see. Steve Now, let me get this perfectly straight. You are saying 1. that the pressure on the TOP of the rings, due to compression is LESS than the pressure in the rest of the cylinder?? heehe!!! Uh, no. Please learn to read. I said that during the power stroke, the pressure against the rings is less than the pressure in the rest of the cylinder. However, it's also true that the pressure against the top of the rings is less than the pressure in the rest of the cylinder during the compression stroke. This is due to the fact that the rings don't produce a 100% seal and let some of the compressed mixture by them and that escaping gas has to pass through the thin turbulent gap between the piston and the cylinder. Whoa here, won't that layer of viscous oil on the cylinder wall (the one you claim is there getting burned) create a seal? It MUST, if as you've stated, it is viscous enough to cause a pressure at the rings of "several times" the compression of the engine. But the difference isn't nearly as great as during the power stroke. You can laugh all you want. It only shows your ignorance. No, it shows YOUR stupidity. 2. But, on the same hand, magically, the pressure on the bottom of the ring is GREATER than the pressure in the rest of the crankcase????? Exactly. Because the ring is moving down and pushing oil out of the way as it does so. When it's moving back up, that's not the case anymore. 3. The pressure on the bottom of the rings is "many times greater" than the 100 or so psi of the combustion chamber? How much? is it 1000 psi? 1,000,000 psi???? Why don't you figure it out for yourself. I've already posted everything an engineer needs to do so. But I'll tell you what I will do, I'll give you some feel for how much force is against the rings *if* the oil being wiped away is at a peak pressure of 1000 psi. HOW IN THE HELL does the oil get to anywhere NEAR "a peak pressure of 1000 psi?? Say the cylinder it 3" in diameter and the gap between the piston and cylinder is 0.005". Also, assume that the gap is totally filled with oil, which really isn't the case but it is a max case possible force. The area is 3*pi*0.005=0.047 sq in. At a peak pressure 1000 psi, the oil exerting a max case force of 47lbs against the rings as they are trying to wipe it away at a very high speed, the top speed of the piston as it moves down the cylinder. In actuality, the film of oil that the rings are pushing aside is really much less than 0.005". Some studies have shown that to prevent excessive wear, you want an oil film thickness of at least 5 microns. So we'll use 5 microns as a "min case", or minimum force that the oil might exert against the rings. 5 microns is about 0.0001975 inches. So the area in this case is 3*pi*0.0001975=0.00186 sq in. So in this min case, 1000 psi of peak oil pressure exerts about 1.86 lbs of force against the rings as they move at their highest speed down the cylinder. In reality, the oil film thickness that the rings would be trying to push away would be somewhere between the max of 0.005 and the min of 0.0002. So at 1000 psi peak pressure against the bottom of the ring, the force would be somewhere between around 2 lbs and 47 lbs. That's certainly within the realm of possibilities, so 1000 psi is also within the realm of possibilities. However, like I said, you have everything you need to figure it out. You can figure out a representative peak piston speed knowing the stroke and rpm of a sample engine. You can figure out the pressure/force that oil of a certain viscosity would exert against something pushing it at that speed. Give it a go. Let's see just how good a structural engineer you really are, as this should be right up your ally. I'll bet you come up with a number that is much greater than 100 psi. Will you bet that, as you've stated prior that I'll come up with a number that is "many times" greater than 100 psi? Or are you changing your story to just now say "much greater"? There is a huge difference here. Steve |
Usage of motoroil
"Joe" wrote in message . ..
Why don't *you* answer some questions? Yes or no: In a normal engine the oil ring on a piston is not 100% effective in removing all of the oil from the cylinder wall? In a normal engine a thin film of oil is left on the cylinder walls on the downward stroke? In a normal engine some oil is burned in the combustion chamber? In a normal engine some oil is consumed in the combustion chamber? What's the matter? You act just like a conservative talk show host, when the heat gets unbearable, you change the task at hand. The previous two posts from you were relating to you calling yourself an engineer. I blew that out of the water, when you specifically stated you were an engineer in GA, and FL. So, anyway, I'll answer your questions, then we'll get back to you being an engineer, okay? All four are not questions. All four are simple statements. A question is phrased like this: In a normal engine IS a thin film......blah blah. |
Usage of motoroil
"Joe" wrote in message ...
Speaking of asslickers, did you call the engineering company that I contract for yet? What did they say? I could care less where you work, and would never call if I did. I (unlike you) am mentally stable Oh, but you stated you were going to call the company I work for and tell them I was wasting company time on google. Also, did you research the size of California lakes yet? Can you prove me wrong? I only sided with Bill due to your track record, never actually checked, nor cared. Now back to you flogging. Back to YOUR flogging, now if you didn't care, nor "actually checked", then you made an ignorant statement, right? Seems to me that a statement made without any knowledge of the subject, is indeed ignorant, wouldn't you agree? Do you dispute the GM tech reference? Yes or no: In a normal engine the oil ring on a piston is not 100% effective in removing all of the oil from the cylinder wall. In a normal engine a thin film of oil is left on the cylinder walls on the downward stroke. In a normal engine some oil is burned in the combustion chamber. In a normal engine some oil is consumed in the combustion chamber. You've not asked any questions, those are simple statements. |
Usage of motoroil
"Put Name Here" wrote in message news:63KRa.77255$OZ2.12983@rwcrnsc54...
Don't they teach patience at the dojo? No, they don't "teach" patience. Patience is something that comes from within, and takes practice. What they DO teach is how to enlighten mind and body, then you can achieve such attributes as patience, reasoning. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com