On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 21:39:59 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:01:28 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 15:42:27 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 12:09:42 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

The only thing I can think of .... and this will cause indigestion for
many here ... is a required registration of all guns
and strict enforcement of the required registration. If for some reason
you are found to be in possession of a firearm that is not registered to
you as it's owner, it results in immediate confiscation of that firearm.

===

The usual argument against mandatory registration is that in can be
seen as a first step towards confiscation. That might seem ridiculous
to some but it has happened elsewhere, and it's very hard to put the
toothpaste back in the tube once the information and law is out there.
It would turn a large percentage of the population into law breakers,
sort of like prohibition and the 55 mph speed limit.


Not so farfetched an idea.

https://www.npr.org/2018/03/27/59725...cond-amendment

I'd go along with total repeal if they substituted term limits as the new amendment.

Two different issues but it does demonstrate why these guys should
retire. They are delusional.
Even if you could get a repeal out of congress and that is a huge
stretch, there is no way you get enough states, even if they do split
up California.


I'm just saying that I'd trade the one for the other. **** the guns, let's get the country away from
the permanent assholes on the hill.