Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Well, well ...
On 5/17/2018 5:54 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2018 16:46:24 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/17/18 2:44 PM, wrote: On Thu, 17 May 2018 07:34:42 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/17/18 7:07 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/17/2018 12:07 AM, wrote: On Wed, 16 May 2018 19:48:02 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/16/18 6:08 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed President Donald Trump's attorneys that they have concluded they cannot indict a sitting president, according to Rudy Giuliani, the President's lawyer. Source: CNN Th-th-th-that's all folks! That's been a question since the beginning. If that is the case, Mueller can still issue an evidence-full report that cuts Trump off at the knees. He can also subpoena Trump. And if it is all bad enough, even the GOP House might impeach him. The odds are stacking up against Trump completing a term. I don't think that is what is going on. I bet Mueller is coming up dry on the russian collusion investigation as it pertains to Trump so he issued this sour grapes statement and he is going to justify his existence by going after unrelated financial crimes against some Trump associates and direct charges against Russians he can never arrest. When you read the Facebook report it really looks like they were just spreading general discord, not necessarily trying to get Trump elected. To that end they succeeded behind their wildest dreams, simply because we have this witch hunt going on and by how much negative opinion there is against a sitting US president. In the mean time Putin is wildly popular in his country, even when polled by people from the outside. Every time he sees Bill Maher, Rachel or anyone on CNN, he has to chuckle. I suspect that Mueller's final report will identify several things that accuse Trump of being guilty of but he will not indict him for any of them leaving it up to Congress to pursue impeachment and then indictment if they so desire.* Won't happen. It will end up being much the same outcome as when Hillary was given a get out of jail free card for her numerous actions, leaving both the left and the right frustrated and disgusted with the federal justice system. Impeachment *is* indictment. If Mueller does go the "report" route, it hopefully will be revealing and devastating enough to finish Trump politically, even if Trump is not impeached by his buddies in the GOP house. If the Republicans lose the house this fall, impeachment will be on the table and there will be reopened investigations that will be for real, instead of the sham investigations the GOP-run committees ran. You keep assuming they actually identify a crime and a "high" crime at that. So far they have some tax scams, unrelated to Trump and a bunch of Facebook trolls. The founders did not define "high crimes and misdeanors." Therefore, it is up to the House to define whether they have occurred. So far, you don't know what Mueller has. Misdemeanors...sheesh. ? Yup they got him cold here http://gfretwell.com/ftp/Trump%20caught.jpg So far not far from the truth. Just watching MSNBC for a while. They are discussing all the legal issues regarding indicting a sitting POTUS ad nauseam. All the experts are chiming in with their take on what's going to happen ... will Mueller indict or will he issue a grand jury subpoena or will he just issue a detailed report and let Congress start impeachment hearings. Only problem I found with their dialog and discussion was: Nobody seems to know what crimes Trump has committed. One legal guy was bitching about the number of times Trump plays golf. Others were bitching that Trump is not conducting himself like other presidents have. And then, of course, there's that Stormy thing. |
#23
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Well, well ...
On 5/17/18 7:08 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/17/2018 5:54 PM, wrote: On Thu, 17 May 2018 16:46:24 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/17/18 2:44 PM, wrote: On Thu, 17 May 2018 07:34:42 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/17/18 7:07 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/17/2018 12:07 AM, wrote: On Wed, 16 May 2018 19:48:02 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/16/18 6:08 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed President Donald Trump's attorneys that they have concluded they cannot indict a sitting president, according to Rudy Giuliani, the President's lawyer. Source: CNN Th-th-th-that's all folks! That's been a question since the beginning. If that is the case, Mueller can still issue an evidence-full report that cuts Trump off at the knees. He can also subpoena Trump. And if it is all bad enough, even the GOP House might impeach him. The odds are stacking up against Trump completing a term. I don't think that is what is going on. I bet Mueller is coming up dry on the russian collusion investigation as it pertains to Trump so he issued this sour grapes statement and he is going to justify his existence by going after unrelated financial crimes against some Trump associates and direct charges against Russians he can never arrest. When you read the Facebook report it really looks like they were just spreading general discord, not necessarily trying to get Trump elected. To that end they succeeded behind their wildest dreams, simply because we have this witch hunt going on and by how much negative opinion there is against a sitting US president. In the mean time Putin is wildly popular in his country, even when polled by people from the outside. Every time he sees Bill Maher, Rachel or anyone on CNN, he has to chuckle. I suspect that Mueller's final report will identify several things that accuse Trump of being guilty of but he will not indict him for any of them leaving it up to Congress to pursue impeachment and then indictment if they so desire.* Won't happen. It will end up being much the same outcome as when Hillary was given a get out of jail free card for her numerous actions, leaving both the left and the right frustrated and disgusted with the federal justice system. Impeachment *is* indictment. If Mueller does go the "report" route, it hopefully will be revealing and devastating enough to finish Trump politically, even if Trump is not impeached by his buddies in the GOP house. If the Republicans lose the house this fall, impeachment will be on the table and there will be reopened investigations that will be for real, instead of the sham investigations the GOP-run committees ran. You keep assuming they actually identify a crime and a "high" crime at that. So far they have some tax scams, unrelated to Trump and a bunch of Facebook trolls. The founders did not define "high crimes and misdeanors." Therefore, it is up to the House to define whether they have occurred. So far, you don't know what Mueller has. Misdemeanors...sheesh. ? Yup they got him cold here http://gfretwell.com/ftp/Trump%20caught.jpg So far not far from the truth. Just watching MSNBC for a while.* They are discussing all the legal issues regarding indicting a sitting POTUS ad nauseam.* All the experts are chiming in with their take on what's going to happen ... will Mueller indict or will he issue a grand jury subpoena or will he just issue a detailed report and let Congress start impeachment hearings. Only problem I found with their dialog and discussion was: Nobody seems to know what crimes Trump has committed. One legal guy was bitching about the number of times Trump plays golf. Others were bitching that Trump is not conducting himself like other presidents have. And then, of course, there's that Stormy thing. There's been plenty of legal discussion regarding what laws Trump and Family and Company may have broken. Mueller, however, is running a tight ship, so there's not much anyone outside of the inner circle of the investigation knows for sure. What is humorous is that even though you don't know anything about what Mueller is doing, you think you do. "One year of Watergate is enough," said Richard Nixon just before he resigned. |
#24
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Well, well ...
On 5/17/2018 8:04 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/17/18 7:08 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/17/2018 5:54 PM, wrote: On Thu, 17 May 2018 16:46:24 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/17/18 2:44 PM, wrote: On Thu, 17 May 2018 07:34:42 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/17/18 7:07 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/17/2018 12:07 AM, wrote: On Wed, 16 May 2018 19:48:02 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/16/18 6:08 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed President Donald Trump's attorneys that they have concluded they cannot indict a sitting president, according to Rudy Giuliani, the President's lawyer. Source: CNN Th-th-th-that's all folks! That's been a question since the beginning. If that is the case, Mueller can still issue an evidence-full report that cuts Trump off at the knees. He can also subpoena Trump. And if it is all bad enough, even the GOP House might impeach him. The odds are stacking up against Trump completing a term. I don't think that is what is going on. I bet Mueller is coming up dry on the russian collusion investigation as it pertains to Trump so he issued this sour grapes statement and he is going to justify his existence by going after unrelated financial crimes against some Trump associates and direct charges against Russians he can never arrest. When you read the Facebook report it really looks like they were just spreading general discord, not necessarily trying to get Trump elected. To that end they succeeded behind their wildest dreams, simply because we have this witch hunt going on and by how much negative opinion there is against a sitting US president. In the mean time Putin is wildly popular in his country, even when polled by people from the outside. Every time he sees Bill Maher, Rachel or anyone on CNN, he has to chuckle. I suspect that Mueller's final report will identify several things that accuse Trump of being guilty of but he will not indict him for any of them leaving it up to Congress to pursue impeachment and then indictment if they so desire.* Won't happen. It will end up being much the same outcome as when Hillary was given a get out of jail free card for her numerous actions, leaving both the left and the right frustrated and disgusted with the federal justice system. Impeachment *is* indictment. If Mueller does go the "report" route, it hopefully will be revealing and devastating enough to finish Trump politically, even if Trump is not impeached by his buddies in the GOP house. If the Republicans lose the house this fall, impeachment will be on the table and there will be reopened investigations that will be for real, instead of the sham investigations the GOP-run committees ran. You keep assuming they actually identify a crime and a "high" crime at that. So far they have some tax scams, unrelated to Trump and a bunch of Facebook trolls. The founders did not define "high crimes and misdeanors." Therefore, it is up to the House to define whether they have occurred. So far, you don't know what Mueller has. Misdemeanors...sheesh. ? Yup they got him cold here http://gfretwell.com/ftp/Trump%20caught.jpg So far not far from the truth. Just watching MSNBC for a while.* They are discussing all the legal issues regarding indicting a sitting POTUS ad nauseam.* All the experts are chiming in with their take on what's going to happen ... will Mueller indict or will he issue a grand jury subpoena or will he just issue a detailed report and let Congress start impeachment hearings. Only problem I found with their dialog and discussion was: Nobody seems to know what crimes Trump has committed. One legal guy was bitching about the number of times Trump plays golf. Others were bitching that Trump is not conducting himself like other presidents have. And then, of course, there's that Stormy thing. There's been plenty of legal discussion regarding what laws Trump and Family and Company may have broken. Mueller, however, is running a tight ship, so there's not much anyone outside of the inner circle of the investigation knows for sure. What is humorous is that even though you don't know anything about what Mueller is doing, you think you do. "One year of Watergate is enough," said Richard Nixon just before he resigned. I don't know what Mueller has on Trump but the liberal media I referenced in my post doesn't know either. Sure, there are many legal discussions, as you say, about what laws Trump and family *may* have broken but the bottom line is that *nobody* knows for sure. I guess you missed the point of my post. It was about the assumption the pundits on MSNBC have that he *is* guilty and all that needs to be seen is what Mueller does about it. |
#25
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Well, well ...
On Thu, 17 May 2018 20:04:35 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 5/17/18 7:08 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/17/2018 5:54 PM, wrote: On Thu, 17 May 2018 16:46:24 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/17/18 2:44 PM, wrote: On Thu, 17 May 2018 07:34:42 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/17/18 7:07 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/17/2018 12:07 AM, wrote: On Wed, 16 May 2018 19:48:02 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/16/18 6:08 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed President Donald Trump's attorneys that they have concluded they cannot indict a sitting president, according to Rudy Giuliani, the President's lawyer. Source: CNN Th-th-th-that's all folks! That's been a question since the beginning. If that is the case, Mueller can still issue an evidence-full report that cuts Trump off at the knees. He can also subpoena Trump. And if it is all bad enough, even the GOP House might impeach him. The odds are stacking up against Trump completing a term. I don't think that is what is going on. I bet Mueller is coming up dry on the russian collusion investigation as it pertains to Trump so he issued this sour grapes statement and he is going to justify his existence by going after unrelated financial crimes against some Trump associates and direct charges against Russians he can never arrest. When you read the Facebook report it really looks like they were just spreading general discord, not necessarily trying to get Trump elected. To that end they succeeded behind their wildest dreams, simply because we have this witch hunt going on and by how much negative opinion there is against a sitting US president. In the mean time Putin is wildly popular in his country, even when polled by people from the outside. Every time he sees Bill Maher, Rachel or anyone on CNN, he has to chuckle. I suspect that Mueller's final report will identify several things that accuse Trump of being guilty of but he will not indict him for any of them leaving it up to Congress to pursue impeachment and then indictment if they so desire.* Won't happen. It will end up being much the same outcome as when Hillary was given a get out of jail free card for her numerous actions, leaving both the left and the right frustrated and disgusted with the federal justice system. Impeachment *is* indictment. If Mueller does go the "report" route, it hopefully will be revealing and devastating enough to finish Trump politically, even if Trump is not impeached by his buddies in the GOP house. If the Republicans lose the house this fall, impeachment will be on the table and there will be reopened investigations that will be for real, instead of the sham investigations the GOP-run committees ran. You keep assuming they actually identify a crime and a "high" crime at that. So far they have some tax scams, unrelated to Trump and a bunch of Facebook trolls. The founders did not define "high crimes and misdeanors." Therefore, it is up to the House to define whether they have occurred. So far, you don't know what Mueller has. Misdemeanors...sheesh. ? Yup they got him cold here http://gfretwell.com/ftp/Trump%20caught.jpg So far not far from the truth. Just watching MSNBC for a while.* They are discussing all the legal issues regarding indicting a sitting POTUS ad nauseam.* All the experts are chiming in with their take on what's going to happen ... will Mueller indict or will he issue a grand jury subpoena or will he just issue a detailed report and let Congress start impeachment hearings. Only problem I found with their dialog and discussion was: Nobody seems to know what crimes Trump has committed. One legal guy was bitching about the number of times Trump plays golf. Others were bitching that Trump is not conducting himself like other presidents have. And then, of course, there's that Stormy thing. There's been plenty of legal discussion regarding what laws Trump and Family and Company may have broken. Mueller, however, is running a tight ship, so there's not much anyone outside of the inner circle of the investigation knows for sure. What is humorous is that even though you don't know anything about what Mueller is doing, you think you do. "One year of Watergate is enough," said Richard Nixon just before he resigned. There is a huge difference between this and Watergate. In Watergate the investigation kept getting closer to the president and the coverup. In this witch hunt they keep moving farther away. |
#26
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Well, well ...
On 5/18/18 12:23 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2018 20:04:35 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/17/18 7:08 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/17/2018 5:54 PM, wrote: On Thu, 17 May 2018 16:46:24 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/17/18 2:44 PM, wrote: On Thu, 17 May 2018 07:34:42 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/17/18 7:07 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/17/2018 12:07 AM, wrote: On Wed, 16 May 2018 19:48:02 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 5/16/18 6:08 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has informed President Donald Trump's attorneys that they have concluded they cannot indict a sitting president, according to Rudy Giuliani, the President's lawyer. Source: CNN Th-th-th-that's all folks! That's been a question since the beginning. If that is the case, Mueller can still issue an evidence-full report that cuts Trump off at the knees. He can also subpoena Trump. And if it is all bad enough, even the GOP House might impeach him. The odds are stacking up against Trump completing a term. I don't think that is what is going on. I bet Mueller is coming up dry on the russian collusion investigation as it pertains to Trump so he issued this sour grapes statement and he is going to justify his existence by going after unrelated financial crimes against some Trump associates and direct charges against Russians he can never arrest. When you read the Facebook report it really looks like they were just spreading general discord, not necessarily trying to get Trump elected. To that end they succeeded behind their wildest dreams, simply because we have this witch hunt going on and by how much negative opinion there is against a sitting US president. In the mean time Putin is wildly popular in his country, even when polled by people from the outside. Every time he sees Bill Maher, Rachel or anyone on CNN, he has to chuckle. I suspect that Mueller's final report will identify several things that accuse Trump of being guilty of but he will not indict him for any of them leaving it up to Congress to pursue impeachment and then indictment if they so desire.* Won't happen. It will end up being much the same outcome as when Hillary was given a get out of jail free card for her numerous actions, leaving both the left and the right frustrated and disgusted with the federal justice system. Impeachment *is* indictment. If Mueller does go the "report" route, it hopefully will be revealing and devastating enough to finish Trump politically, even if Trump is not impeached by his buddies in the GOP house. If the Republicans lose the house this fall, impeachment will be on the table and there will be reopened investigations that will be for real, instead of the sham investigations the GOP-run committees ran. You keep assuming they actually identify a crime and a "high" crime at that. So far they have some tax scams, unrelated to Trump and a bunch of Facebook trolls. The founders did not define "high crimes and misdeanors." Therefore, it is up to the House to define whether they have occurred. So far, you don't know what Mueller has. Misdemeanors...sheesh. ? Yup they got him cold here http://gfretwell.com/ftp/Trump%20caught.jpg So far not far from the truth. Just watching MSNBC for a while.* They are discussing all the legal issues regarding indicting a sitting POTUS ad nauseam.* All the experts are chiming in with their take on what's going to happen ... will Mueller indict or will he issue a grand jury subpoena or will he just issue a detailed report and let Congress start impeachment hearings. Only problem I found with their dialog and discussion was: Nobody seems to know what crimes Trump has committed. One legal guy was bitching about the number of times Trump plays golf. Others were bitching that Trump is not conducting himself like other presidents have. And then, of course, there's that Stormy thing. There's been plenty of legal discussion regarding what laws Trump and Family and Company may have broken. Mueller, however, is running a tight ship, so there's not much anyone outside of the inner circle of the investigation knows for sure. What is humorous is that even though you don't know anything about what Mueller is doing, you think you do. "One year of Watergate is enough," said Richard Nixon just before he resigned. There is a huge difference between this and Watergate. In Watergate the investigation kept getting closer to the president and the coverup. In this witch hunt they keep moving farther away. How would you know where the investigation is headed? You have a mole in Mueller's team? |
#27
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Well, well ...
Keyser Soze
- show quoted text - How would you know where the investigation is headed? You have a mole in Mueller's team? .......... Ask yourself that same question Harry. You seem to think you have it all figured out. |
#28
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Well, well ...
On 5/18/18 9:26 AM, Tim wrote:
Keyser Soze - show quoted text - How would you know where the investigation is headed? You have a mole in Mueller's team? ......... Ask yourself that same question Harry. You seem to think you have it all figured out. No, I don't, and I've said that here many times. I have no idea where Mueller's investigation is headed. I have commented on some of Mueller's options, but never with the "certainty" of the right-wing naysayers here. I'll be more than satisfied if Mueller's findings further cripple the Trump regime. |
#29
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Well, well ...
On 5/18/2018 9:30 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 5/18/18 9:26 AM, Tim wrote: Keyser Soze - show quoted text - How would you know where the investigation is headed? You have a mole in Mueller's team? ......... Ask yourself that same question Harry.** You seem to think you have it all figured out. No, I don't, and I've said that here many times. I have no idea where Mueller's investigation is headed. I have commented on some of Mueller's options, but never with the "certainty" of the right-wing naysayers here. I'll be more than satisfied if Mueller's findings further cripple the Trump regime. It's obvious that you skip over the "I think" parts of my posts. |
#30
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Well, well ...
8:30 AMKeyser Soze - show quoted text - No, I don't, and I've said that here many times. I have no idea where Mueller's investigation is headed. I have commented on some of Mueller's options, but never with the "certainty" of the right-wing naysayers here. I'll be more than satisfied if Mueller's findings further cripple the Trump regime. ........ Huh? You must live In your own dream world then. “When trump is indicted”. “When trump is impeached” have been there n your vocabulary way more than once. Obviously you know what’s going on wether it really goes on or not. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|