On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:49:06 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/27/18 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:42:37 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/27/2018 8:35 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:


Wow...what a view of history. My disdain for Libertarians is based on
the fact, and I mean fact, that they are just modern Republicans who say
they are in favor of loosening regulations against marijuana...

So Cryin' Chuck is now a Libertarian?


http://time.com/5247431/senator-chuck-schumer-marijuana-decriminalize-bill/

Harry is so blind that he doesn't know the Democrats share more issues
with Libertarians than Republicans. The main reason Libertarians end
up being Republicans is they actually want to pay for things the
government gives away and that is the biggest issue. Unfortunately the
GOP has lost sight of paying our bills too.


The main reason Libertarians running for federal office end up being
Republicans is that they cannot get elected as Libertarians because no
one will buy their platforms of nonsense and insanity and the weakness
of their candidates. Even your boy Gary Johnson when he was a governor
*was* and ran as a Republican.

You keep ignoring the power of the political machine and the fact that
the deck is stacked against any 3d party candidate, no matter what
their platform is. After 96 that even became more of a rigged game.
It doesn't mean we get better candidates tho. In fact the last
election proves the opposite. We had the weakest field in recent
history. Hillary, the establishment choice, was so bad, she couldn't
even beat Donald ****ing Trump.

On 4/27/18 3:00 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:49:06 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/27/18 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:42:37 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/27/2018 8:35 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:


Wow...what a view of history. My disdain for Libertarians is based on
the fact, and I mean fact, that they are just modern Republicans who say
they are in favor of loosening regulations against marijuana...

So Cryin' Chuck is now a Libertarian?


http://time.com/5247431/senator-chuck-schumer-marijuana-decriminalize-bill/

Harry is so blind that he doesn't know the Democrats share more issues
with Libertarians than Republicans. The main reason Libertarians end
up being Republicans is they actually want to pay for things the
government gives away and that is the biggest issue. Unfortunately the
GOP has lost sight of paying our bills too.


The main reason Libertarians running for federal office end up being
Republicans is that they cannot get elected as Libertarians because no
one will buy their platforms of nonsense and insanity and the weakness
of their candidates. Even your boy Gary Johnson when he was a governor
*was* and ran as a Republican.

You keep ignoring the power of the political machine and the fact that
the deck is stacked against any 3d party candidate, no matter what
their platform is. After 96 that even became more of a rigged game.
It doesn't mean we get better candidates tho. In fact the last
election proves the opposite. We had the weakest field in recent
history. Hillary, the establishment choice, was so bad, she couldn't
even beat Donald ****ing Trump.


When Rand Paul is about the only Libertarian holding a federal office
and even he is there as a Republican, your party of choice is going to
go nowhere.

On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:03:24 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/27/18 3:00 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:49:06 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/27/18 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:42:37 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/27/2018 8:35 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:


Wow...what a view of history. My disdain for Libertarians is based on
the fact, and I mean fact, that they are just modern Republicans who say
they are in favor of loosening regulations against marijuana...

So Cryin' Chuck is now a Libertarian?


http://time.com/5247431/senator-chuck-schumer-marijuana-decriminalize-bill/

Harry is so blind that he doesn't know the Democrats share more issues
with Libertarians than Republicans. The main reason Libertarians end
up being Republicans is they actually want to pay for things the
government gives away and that is the biggest issue. Unfortunately the
GOP has lost sight of paying our bills too.


The main reason Libertarians running for federal office end up being
Republicans is that they cannot get elected as Libertarians because no
one will buy their platforms of nonsense and insanity and the weakness
of their candidates. Even your boy Gary Johnson when he was a governor
*was* and ran as a Republican.

You keep ignoring the power of the political machine and the fact that
the deck is stacked against any 3d party candidate, no matter what
their platform is. After 96 that even became more of a rigged game.
It doesn't mean we get better candidates tho. In fact the last
election proves the opposite. We had the weakest field in recent
history. Hillary, the establishment choice, was so bad, she couldn't
even beat Donald ****ing Trump.


When Rand Paul is about the only Libertarian holding a federal office
and even he is there as a Republican, your party of choice is going to
go nowhere.

This is not about parties, it is about ideas. We already established
there are really only going to be 2 parties and they assured that
after 96 with all of the rule changes.

On 4/28/18 1:11 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:03:24 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/27/18 3:00 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:49:06 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/27/18 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:42:37 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/27/2018 8:35 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:


Wow...what a view of history. My disdain for Libertarians is based on
the fact, and I mean fact, that they are just modern Republicans who say
they are in favor of loosening regulations against marijuana...

So Cryin' Chuck is now a Libertarian?


http://time.com/5247431/senator-chuck-schumer-marijuana-decriminalize-bill/

Harry is so blind that he doesn't know the Democrats share more issues
with Libertarians than Republicans. The main reason Libertarians end
up being Republicans is they actually want to pay for things the
government gives away and that is the biggest issue. Unfortunately the
GOP has lost sight of paying our bills too.


The main reason Libertarians running for federal office end up being
Republicans is that they cannot get elected as Libertarians because no
one will buy their platforms of nonsense and insanity and the weakness
of their candidates. Even your boy Gary Johnson when he was a governor
*was* and ran as a Republican.

You keep ignoring the power of the political machine and the fact that
the deck is stacked against any 3d party candidate, no matter what
their platform is. After 96 that even became more of a rigged game.
It doesn't mean we get better candidates tho. In fact the last
election proves the opposite. We had the weakest field in recent
history. Hillary, the establishment choice, was so bad, she couldn't
even beat Donald ****ing Trump.


When Rand Paul is about the only Libertarian holding a federal office
and even he is there as a Republican, your party of choice is going to
go nowhere.

This is not about parties, it is about ideas. We already established
there are really only going to be 2 parties and they assured that
after 96 with all of the rule changes.


Libertarians have real "ideas" beyond dumping government regulation and
almost total reliance on "private initiatives"? There's really nothing
there beyond that, and the helter-skelter way Trump and the GOP (and
libertarianism is nothing more than a branch of the GOP) are dismantling
the country will lead to more disdain for your beloved "I've got mine,
so **** you" political catechism.

8:14 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Libertarians have real "ideas" beyond dumping government regulation and
almost total reliance on "private initiatives"? There's really nothing
there beyond that, and the helter-skelter way Trump and the GOP (and
libertarianism is nothing more than a branch of the GOP) are dismantling
the country will lead to more disdain for your beloved "I've got mine,
so **** you" political catechism.

... xxxxxx


Instead of constant bashing the GOP or Libertarian parties please tell us the benefits of the DNC .

On 4/28/18 9:33 AM, Tim wrote:

8:14 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Libertarians have real "ideas" beyond dumping government regulation and
almost total reliance on "private initiatives"? There's really nothing
there beyond that, and the helter-skelter way Trump and the GOP (and
libertarianism is nothing more than a branch of the GOP) are dismantling
the country will lead to more disdain for your beloved "I've got mine,
so **** you" political catechism.

.. xxxxxx


Instead of constant bashing the GOP or Libertarian parties please tell us the benefits of the DNC .


Well, Timmy, I don't know what bennies the DNC offers its employees or
volunteers. It's just a committee, after all.

On 4/28/2018 9:44 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/28/18 9:33 AM, Tim wrote:

8:14 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Libertarians have real "ideas" beyond dumping government regulation and
almost total reliance on "private initiatives"?Â* There's really nothing
there beyond that, and the helter-skelter way Trump and the GOP (and
libertarianism is nothing more than a branch of the GOP) are dismantling
the country will lead to more disdain for your beloved "I've got mine,
so **** you" political catechism.

..Â*Â* xxxxxx


Instead of constant bashing the GOP or Libertarian parties please tell
us the benefits of the DNC .


Well, Timmy, I don't know what bennies the DNC offers its employees or
volunteers. It's just a committee, after all.


Hillary benefited thanks to the DNC and it's misappropriation of
donations that were supposed to go to support state office candidates
but ended up in her campaign war chest instead.

Watch for more revelations about this in coming weeks.

8:44 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Well, Timmy, I don't know what bennies the DNC offers its employees or
volunteers. It's just a committee, after all.
........

It’s also the head of the Democratic Party. You want to break it down further?

What are the benefits of Democrat leadership? Can you explain thee benefits or do you solely want to bash anything but democratic/socialists?

On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 09:14:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/28/18 1:11 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:03:24 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/27/18 3:00 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:49:06 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/27/18 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:42:37 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 4/27/2018 8:35 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:


Wow...what a view of history. My disdain for Libertarians is based on
the fact, and I mean fact, that they are just modern Republicans who say
they are in favor of loosening regulations against marijuana...

So Cryin' Chuck is now a Libertarian?


http://time.com/5247431/senator-chuck-schumer-marijuana-decriminalize-bill/

Harry is so blind that he doesn't know the Democrats share more issues
with Libertarians than Republicans. The main reason Libertarians end
up being Republicans is they actually want to pay for things the
government gives away and that is the biggest issue. Unfortunately the
GOP has lost sight of paying our bills too.


The main reason Libertarians running for federal office end up being
Republicans is that they cannot get elected as Libertarians because no
one will buy their platforms of nonsense and insanity and the weakness
of their candidates. Even your boy Gary Johnson when he was a governor
*was* and ran as a Republican.

You keep ignoring the power of the political machine and the fact that
the deck is stacked against any 3d party candidate, no matter what
their platform is. After 96 that even became more of a rigged game.
It doesn't mean we get better candidates tho. In fact the last
election proves the opposite. We had the weakest field in recent
history. Hillary, the establishment choice, was so bad, she couldn't
even beat Donald ****ing Trump.


When Rand Paul is about the only Libertarian holding a federal office
and even he is there as a Republican, your party of choice is going to
go nowhere.

This is not about parties, it is about ideas. We already established
there are really only going to be 2 parties and they assured that
after 96 with all of the rule changes.


Libertarians have real "ideas" beyond dumping government regulation and
almost total reliance on "private initiatives"? There's really nothing
there beyond that, and the helter-skelter way Trump and the GOP (and
libertarianism is nothing more than a branch of the GOP) are dismantling
the country will lead to more disdain for your beloved "I've got mine,
so **** you" political catechism.


Simplistic thinking like that is like saying democrats are only for
taking money from the people who earned it and giving it to those who
won't work, using a massive government that runs on borrowed money.

Say, that might not be too far wrong.