Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/27/2018 8:35 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
Wow...what a view of history. My disdain for Libertarians is based on the fact, and I mean fact, that they are just modern Republicans who say they are in favor of loosening regulations against marijuana... So Cryin' Chuck is now a Libertarian? http://time.com/5247431/senator-chuck-schumer-marijuana-decriminalize-bill/ |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:42:37 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 4/27/2018 8:35 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: Wow...what a view of history. My disdain for Libertarians is based on the fact, and I mean fact, that they are just modern Republicans who say they are in favor of loosening regulations against marijuana... So Cryin' Chuck is now a Libertarian? http://time.com/5247431/senator-chuck-schumer-marijuana-decriminalize-bill/ Harry is so blind that he doesn't know the Democrats share more issues with Libertarians than Republicans. The main reason Libertarians end up being Republicans is they actually want to pay for things the government gives away and that is the biggest issue. Unfortunately the GOP has lost sight of paying our bills too. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/27/18 3:00 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:49:06 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/27/18 12:23 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:42:37 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 4/27/2018 8:35 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: Wow...what a view of history. My disdain for Libertarians is based on the fact, and I mean fact, that they are just modern Republicans who say they are in favor of loosening regulations against marijuana... So Cryin' Chuck is now a Libertarian? http://time.com/5247431/senator-chuck-schumer-marijuana-decriminalize-bill/ Harry is so blind that he doesn't know the Democrats share more issues with Libertarians than Republicans. The main reason Libertarians end up being Republicans is they actually want to pay for things the government gives away and that is the biggest issue. Unfortunately the GOP has lost sight of paying our bills too. The main reason Libertarians running for federal office end up being Republicans is that they cannot get elected as Libertarians because no one will buy their platforms of nonsense and insanity and the weakness of their candidates. Even your boy Gary Johnson when he was a governor *was* and ran as a Republican. You keep ignoring the power of the political machine and the fact that the deck is stacked against any 3d party candidate, no matter what their platform is. After 96 that even became more of a rigged game. It doesn't mean we get better candidates tho. In fact the last election proves the opposite. We had the weakest field in recent history. Hillary, the establishment choice, was so bad, she couldn't even beat Donald ****ing Trump. When Rand Paul is about the only Libertarian holding a federal office and even he is there as a Republican, your party of choice is going to go nowhere. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:03:24 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 4/27/18 3:00 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:49:06 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/27/18 12:23 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:42:37 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 4/27/2018 8:35 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: Wow...what a view of history. My disdain for Libertarians is based on the fact, and I mean fact, that they are just modern Republicans who say they are in favor of loosening regulations against marijuana... So Cryin' Chuck is now a Libertarian? http://time.com/5247431/senator-chuck-schumer-marijuana-decriminalize-bill/ Harry is so blind that he doesn't know the Democrats share more issues with Libertarians than Republicans. The main reason Libertarians end up being Republicans is they actually want to pay for things the government gives away and that is the biggest issue. Unfortunately the GOP has lost sight of paying our bills too. The main reason Libertarians running for federal office end up being Republicans is that they cannot get elected as Libertarians because no one will buy their platforms of nonsense and insanity and the weakness of their candidates. Even your boy Gary Johnson when he was a governor *was* and ran as a Republican. You keep ignoring the power of the political machine and the fact that the deck is stacked against any 3d party candidate, no matter what their platform is. After 96 that even became more of a rigged game. It doesn't mean we get better candidates tho. In fact the last election proves the opposite. We had the weakest field in recent history. Hillary, the establishment choice, was so bad, she couldn't even beat Donald ****ing Trump. When Rand Paul is about the only Libertarian holding a federal office and even he is there as a Republican, your party of choice is going to go nowhere. This is not about parties, it is about ideas. We already established there are really only going to be 2 parties and they assured that after 96 with all of the rule changes. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/28/18 1:11 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:03:24 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/27/18 3:00 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 14:49:06 -0400, Keyser Soze wrote: On 4/27/18 12:23 PM, wrote: On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:42:37 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 4/27/2018 8:35 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: Wow...what a view of history. My disdain for Libertarians is based on the fact, and I mean fact, that they are just modern Republicans who say they are in favor of loosening regulations against marijuana... So Cryin' Chuck is now a Libertarian? http://time.com/5247431/senator-chuck-schumer-marijuana-decriminalize-bill/ Harry is so blind that he doesn't know the Democrats share more issues with Libertarians than Republicans. The main reason Libertarians end up being Republicans is they actually want to pay for things the government gives away and that is the biggest issue. Unfortunately the GOP has lost sight of paying our bills too. The main reason Libertarians running for federal office end up being Republicans is that they cannot get elected as Libertarians because no one will buy their platforms of nonsense and insanity and the weakness of their candidates. Even your boy Gary Johnson when he was a governor *was* and ran as a Republican. You keep ignoring the power of the political machine and the fact that the deck is stacked against any 3d party candidate, no matter what their platform is. After 96 that even became more of a rigged game. It doesn't mean we get better candidates tho. In fact the last election proves the opposite. We had the weakest field in recent history. Hillary, the establishment choice, was so bad, she couldn't even beat Donald ****ing Trump. When Rand Paul is about the only Libertarian holding a federal office and even he is there as a Republican, your party of choice is going to go nowhere. This is not about parties, it is about ideas. We already established there are really only going to be 2 parties and they assured that after 96 with all of the rule changes. Libertarians have real "ideas" beyond dumping government regulation and almost total reliance on "private initiatives"? There's really nothing there beyond that, and the helter-skelter way Trump and the GOP (and libertarianism is nothing more than a branch of the GOP) are dismantling the country will lead to more disdain for your beloved "I've got mine, so **** you" political catechism. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More Chicago style politics... | General | |||
Reversing the Chicago River: How the Chicago Sanitary and Ship CanalMade a River Run Backwards | General | |||
Asian carp DNA found in water samples from the Chicago River :: CHICAGO | General | |||
Raising the roof...er...mast | General | |||
OT Raising Threat Level | ASA |