On 4/11/2018 7:54 AM, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 12:56:17 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/18 1:49 PM, Tim wrote:
justan
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:58:22 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


...than having your office raided by the FBI is having your lawyer?s office
raided by the FBI.

It is interesting that if this was anyone but Trump you liberals would
be screaming to high heaven about lawyer client privilege.
What's next? Bugging the therapist's office?
The DoJ is clearly out of control ... again.



Apparently lawyer Cohen was not producing the requested documents. There?s
no privilege in a case where the lawyer is part of the criminal enterprise,
I believe.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.


What criminal enterprise?


No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

Enlighten us on all the trump family convictions, then.



I've read of a few civil litigation issues that Trump's enterprises have
been charged with (and lost in some cases) but I've never heard of
a criminal conviction.

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!

On 4/11/2018 7:59 AM, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!



No kidding. Putting political party bias aside for a moment and just
looking at the issue of "fairness" the accusations made regarding
Trump's past pale in comparison to those of Hillary's. If a special
prosecutor was ever appointed to investigate her activities in public
office and as a candidate for POTUS, the investigation team would have a
field day finding evidence of criminal corruption.

I have a hunch that many political IOUs are being called as due to
prevent that from ever happening.

Tim Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn?t the sex...it?s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!


When Fat Harry thinks he's revealing something significant, it is
worthwhile to peel the onion back a little further. Fat Harry is
a lazy ****. He fails to do any research before he jumps on the
destroy Trump bandwagon. Not only that, he lies about everything.
I guess he can't help himself. He was raised by a boat salesman
and a political functuary.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Tim Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 12:56:17 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/18 1:49 PM, Tim wrote:
justan
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:58:22 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


...than having your office raided by the FBI is having your lawyer?s office
raided by the FBI.

It is interesting that if this was anyone but Trump you liberals would
be screaming to high heaven about lawyer client privilege.
What's next? Bugging the therapist's office?
The DoJ is clearly out of control ... again.



Apparently lawyer Cohen was not producing the requested documents. There?s
no privilege in a case where the lawyer is part of the criminal enterprise,
I believe.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.


What criminal enterprise?


No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

Enlighten us on all the trump family convictions, then.


You expect a dim bulb like Fat Harry to enlighten us?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

7:53 AMjustan
Tim Wrote in message:
- show quoted text -
You expect a dim bulb like Fat Harry to enlighten us?
- show quoted text -

-/—/—//——-

Well, I do admit it was a gamble and yes, I took a long shot...

8:14 AMMr. Luddite
- show quoted text -
I don't care if they lock her up. In fact, if she just went away in
retirement I'd be satisfied.

I do care about fairness in the justice system however. It's only fair
that her past be made as public as Trump's if she is going to continue
to make excuses for her loss and accuse everyone as being to blame
except herself. She's a devious and dishonest person.

//::::::

I’d agree. She and the whole DNC for that matter...

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 04:59:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!

The Clintons were awash in foreign money while Hillary was SoS.
Her presidency would have brought out a far bigger investigation than
the one we have now but nobody really cares that much about chasing a
washed up old grandmother ... as long as she stays gone.
I am sure that is why we don't see her much these days.
I also doubt she will be doing much campaigning this summer. It would
only work in the deep blue states that are going to elect a democrat
anyway. If she goes into a swing state she might cause more harm than
good for the democrat. (much like Bill)

On 4/11/18 11:01 AM, wrote:
On 11 Apr 2018 11:06:00 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

As I said a fishing expedition.

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?

That is a pretty thin beef. All Cohen has to say is, IF there was any
political motivation at all, it was to help the GOP as a whole (house
seats, senate seats etc.) There is no limit to what you can contribute
to a party or a cause. Just look at the millions Steyer is spending
right now to help democrats.
If he wants to screw stormy in the legal sense, he just presses
blackmail charges. Most people are going to be less than forthcoming
in a blackmail case since they have to reveal the object of the
blackmail that they were paying to hide.


Oh...I forgot, you went to law school, too. There's just no end to
your expertise...

The Clintons were awash in foreign money while Hillary was SoS.
Her presidency would have brought out a far bigger investigation than
the one we have now but nobody really cares that much about chasing a
washed up old grandmother ... as long as she stays gone.
I am sure that is why we don't see her much these days.
I also doubt she will be doing much campaigning this summer. It would
only work in the deep blue states that are going to elect a democrat
anyway. If she goes into a swing state she might cause more harm than
good for the democrat. (much like Bill)

,,,,,,,,

Greg, I think she needs to stay home and take better care of herself. Too many pics of her stumbling runn Nag around to avoid noticing she has physical problems.