Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:58:22 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


...than having your office raided by the FBI is having your lawyer?s office
raided by the FBI.

It is interesting that if this was anyone but Trump you liberals would
be screaming to high heaven about lawyer client privilege.
What's next? Bugging the therapist's office?
The DoJ is clearly out of control ... again.



Apparently lawyer Cohen was not producing the requested documents. There?s
no privilege in a case where the lawyer is part of the criminal enterprise,
I believe.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.


What criminal enterprise?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

justan
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:58:22 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


...than having your office raided by the FBI is having your lawyer?s office
raided by the FBI.

It is interesting that if this was anyone but Trump you liberals would
be screaming to high heaven about lawyer client privilege.
What's next? Bugging the therapist's office?
The DoJ is clearly out of control ... again.



Apparently lawyer Cohen was not producing the requested documents. There?s
no privilege in a case where the lawyer is part of the criminal enterprise,
I believe.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.


What criminal enterprise?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

:::::::::


So far there is none. Only in Harry’s wishful thinking.

On 4/10/18 1:49 PM, Tim wrote:
justan
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:58:22 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


...than having your office raided by the FBI is having your lawyer?s office
raided by the FBI.

It is interesting that if this was anyone but Trump you liberals would
be screaming to high heaven about lawyer client privilege.
What's next? Bugging the therapist's office?
The DoJ is clearly out of control ... again.



Apparently lawyer Cohen was not producing the requested documents. There?s
no privilege in a case where the lawyer is part of the criminal enterprise,
I believe.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.


What criminal enterprise?


No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")

On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!

On 4/11/2018 7:59 AM, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!



No kidding. Putting political party bias aside for a moment and just
looking at the issue of "fairness" the accusations made regarding
Trump's past pale in comparison to those of Hillary's. If a special
prosecutor was ever appointed to investigate her activities in public
office and as a candidate for POTUS, the investigation team would have a
field day finding evidence of criminal corruption.

I have a hunch that many political IOUs are being called as due to
prevent that from ever happening.

Tim Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn?t the sex...it?s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!


When Fat Harry thinks he's revealing something significant, it is
worthwhile to peel the onion back a little further. Fat Harry is
a lazy ****. He fails to do any research before he jumps on the
destroy Trump bandwagon. Not only that, he lies about everything.
I guess he can't help himself. He was raised by a boat salesman
and a political functuary.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 04:59:27 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!

The Clintons were awash in foreign money while Hillary was SoS.
Her presidency would have brought out a far bigger investigation than
the one we have now but nobody really cares that much about chasing a
washed up old grandmother ... as long as she stays gone.
I am sure that is why we don't see her much these days.
I also doubt she will be doing much campaigning this summer. It would
only work in the deep blue states that are going to elect a democrat
anyway. If she goes into a swing state she might cause more harm than
good for the democrat. (much like Bill)

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 07:52:19 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.



Would you have expected Harry to be up front with something like that?