On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:58:22 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


...than having your office raided by the FBI is having your lawyer’s office
raided by the FBI.

It is interesting that if this was anyone but Trump you liberals would
be screaming to high heaven about lawyer client privilege.
What's next? Bugging the therapist's office?
The DoJ is clearly out of control ... again.

wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:58:22 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


...than having your office raided by the FBI is having your lawyer’s office
raided by the FBI.

It is interesting that if this was anyone but Trump you liberals would
be screaming to high heaven about lawyer client privilege.
What's next? Bugging the therapist's office?
The DoJ is clearly out of control ... again.



Apparently lawyer Cohen was not producing the requested documents. There’s
no privilege in a case where the lawyer is part of the criminal enterprise,
I believe.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:30:55 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:58:22 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


...than having your office raided by the FBI is having your lawyer’s office
raided by the FBI.

It is interesting that if this was anyone but Trump you liberals would
be screaming to high heaven about lawyer client privilege.
What's next? Bugging the therapist's office?
The DoJ is clearly out of control ... again.



Apparently lawyer Cohen was not producing the requested documents. There’s
no privilege in a case where the lawyer is part of the criminal enterprise,
I believe.

It is still troubling. If they can't make the case linking Cohen and
Trump in a "criminal enterprise" it will just be another black eye for
the FBI.

Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:58:22 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


...than having your office raided by the FBI is having your lawyer?s office
raided by the FBI.

It is interesting that if this was anyone but Trump you liberals would
be screaming to high heaven about lawyer client privilege.
What's next? Bugging the therapist's office?
The DoJ is clearly out of control ... again.



Apparently lawyer Cohen was not producing the requested documents. There?s
no privilege in a case where the lawyer is part of the criminal enterprise,
I believe.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.


What criminal enterprise?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

justan
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:58:22 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


...than having your office raided by the FBI is having your lawyer?s office
raided by the FBI.

It is interesting that if this was anyone but Trump you liberals would
be screaming to high heaven about lawyer client privilege.
What's next? Bugging the therapist's office?
The DoJ is clearly out of control ... again.



Apparently lawyer Cohen was not producing the requested documents. There?s
no privilege in a case where the lawyer is part of the criminal enterprise,
I believe.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.


What criminal enterprise?
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

:::::::::


So far there is none. Only in Harry’s wishful thinking.

On 4/10/18 1:49 PM, Tim wrote:
justan
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:58:22 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


...than having your office raided by the FBI is having your lawyer?s office
raided by the FBI.

It is interesting that if this was anyone but Trump you liberals would
be screaming to high heaven about lawyer client privilege.
What's next? Bugging the therapist's office?
The DoJ is clearly out of control ... again.



Apparently lawyer Cohen was not producing the requested documents. There?s
no privilege in a case where the lawyer is part of the criminal enterprise,
I believe.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.


What criminal enterprise?


No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")

On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

On 4/11/18 11:01 AM, wrote:
On 11 Apr 2018 11:06:00 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

As I said a fishing expedition.

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?

That is a pretty thin beef. All Cohen has to say is, IF there was any
political motivation at all, it was to help the GOP as a whole (house
seats, senate seats etc.) There is no limit to what you can contribute
to a party or a cause. Just look at the millions Steyer is spending
right now to help democrats.
If he wants to screw stormy in the legal sense, he just presses
blackmail charges. Most people are going to be less than forthcoming
in a blackmail case since they have to reveal the object of the
blackmail that they were paying to hide.


Oh...I forgot, you went to law school, too. There's just no end to
your expertise...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 12:56:17 PM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/18 1:49 PM, Tim wrote:
justan
Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:58:22 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


...than having your office raided by the FBI is having your lawyer?s office
raided by the FBI.

It is interesting that if this was anyone but Trump you liberals would
be screaming to high heaven about lawyer client privilege.
What's next? Bugging the therapist's office?
The DoJ is clearly out of control ... again.



Apparently lawyer Cohen was not producing the requested documents. There?s
no privilege in a case where the lawyer is part of the criminal enterprise,
I believe.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.


What criminal enterprise?


No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

Enlighten us on all the trump family convictions, then.