|
The Score
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:20:55 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: Trump: 1 Stormy: 0 and a California judge, no less ! What was the decision about. NBC had nothing on this tonight. |
The Score
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 00:27:16 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote: So you say cooperating with the Russian government to fix a Presidential election is not an impeachable offense I have not seen any proof that the election was "fixed" in any way. Certainly there was some damaging information released but isn't that what news organizations are supposed to do? Nobody has said the released emails were not true and they indicated the Hillary team was trying to hurt Sanders as much if not more than Trump. I would think democrats would like to know that, particularly Sanders democrats. Only a democrat could call the truth "meddling". As for the trolling on Facebook, the dossier and the data mining, you have to blame Zuckerberg along with a russian company and the Brits. Why aren't you saying the Brits meddled in the election too? One of their intelligence officers was involved along with one of their corporations. Isn't that pretty much what you say about Russia? |
The Score
|
The Score
|
The Score
|
The Score
On 3/30/2018 9:26 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 3/30/18 1:59 AM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:20:55 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Trump:Â* 1 Stormy: 0 and a California judge, no less ! What was the decision about. NBC had nothing on this tonight. Are you talking about the half hour network news show? Those shows don't cover a lot. It certainly was covered on the NBC cable outlet, MSNBC. Basically, the judge said it wasn't timely yet for Stormy's case against the Trump goniffs to proceed. In another development, Trump's lawyer's lawyer claimed Trump had no knowledge of the $130,000 settlement, which is fake news believed only on Fox, by its watchers, and Luddite here. Would you mind citing when I ever said that? Talk about Fake News. Must be in a liberal's DNA. |
The Score
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 06:00:58 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 00:27:16 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: So you say cooperating with the Russian government to fix a Presidential election is not an impeachable offense I have not seen any proof that the election was "fixed" in any way. "So you say cooperating with the Russian government to fix a Presidential election is not an impeachable offense - if it's Trump? Note, you said it, not me. You're ****ing crazy." Chopping as you did is a very poor practice. I just questioned the "fixed election" part of your rant so we could take your points one at a time. When you preface an entire scenario on a lie, the rest does not rise to the level of being taken seriously. How was it "fixed"? If you can't describe the "fix" the rest falls from it's own weight. |
The Score
On 3/30/2018 12:10 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 06:00:58 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 00:27:16 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: So you say cooperating with the Russian government to fix a Presidential election is not an impeachable offense I have not seen any proof that the election was "fixed" in any way. "So you say cooperating with the Russian government to fix a Presidential election is not an impeachable offense - if it's Trump? Note, you said it, not me. You're ****ing crazy." Chopping as you did is a very poor practice. I just questioned the "fixed election" part of your rant so we could take your points one at a time. When you preface an entire scenario on a lie, the rest does not rise to the level of being taken seriously. How was it "fixed"? If you can't describe the "fix" the rest falls from it's own weight. It's progressive liberal tactic. |
The Score
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 09:26:13 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote: On 3/30/18 1:59 AM, wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:20:55 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Trump: 1 Stormy: 0 and a California judge, no less ! What was the decision about. NBC had nothing on this tonight. Are you talking about the half hour network news show? Those shows don't cover a lot. It certainly was covered on the NBC cable outlet, MSNBC. Basically, the judge said it wasn't timely yet for Stormy's case against the Trump goniffs to proceed. I did not see it on the local or network show. I also did not see it in 2 hours of the CNN "newsroom". All they said was Trump was likely to be deposed and giggling about that. They had no reports about a setback in that case. I don't watch Cooper or Lemon. In another development, Trump's lawyer's lawyer claimed Trump had no knowledge of the $130,000 settlement, which is fake news believed only on Fox, by its watchers, and Luddite here. The legal opinions I have heard say it might actually be better if he did know but it really does not change the validity of the NDA. I do feel bad for Stormy because she is the one who is going to get ground up in this case. I doubt the extra 15 minutes of fame she gets will cover her legal expenses and the breach of contract suit Trump is likely to win. I am still curious how she is getting along with the IRS. I bet Trump is telling them to lay back, just for the optics (if he has any influence at all) but they have a long memory and if she has not been declaring all of this money as income she will be in serious trouble. I doubt any of her legal expenses are deductible and all of that money, including the original buck thirty, is income. The problem with the IRS "laying back" is that interest keeps piling up. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com