On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:47:25 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:13:39 -0500, John H.
wrote:

"The bill prohibits the “sale, transfer, production, and importation” of semi-automatic rifles and
pistols that can hold a detachable magazine, as well as semi-automatic rifles with a magazine that
can hold more than 10 rounds."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ho...rticle/2650087

There goes my Mini-14, and the P226, but I get to keep the Kimber .45 and the .22s!

Nah, they wouldn't do that. Bull****. If they could, they'd ban all firearms. That's the next step.

Why do you think the Kimber is exempt. It has a detachable magazine.
Also Harry's silencers will have limited use in the future since
threaded barrels seem to be outlawed too.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5087/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22H.R.5087%22%5D%7D&r =1

We have heard this song before and the next step from the California
****s (boxer and feinstein) will be a ban on "sniper rifles" roughly
defined as any center fire rifle that can mount a scope.


Whoops! My misread. I guess only the revolvers stay. Everything else has detachable magazine.

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:47:25 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:13:39 -0500, John H.
wrote:

"The bill prohibits the “sale, transfer, production, and importation”
of semi-automatic rifles and
pistols that can hold a detachable magazine, as well as semi-automatic
rifles with a magazine that
can hold more than 10 rounds."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ho...rticle/2650087

There goes my Mini-14, and the P226, but I get to keep the Kimber .45 and the .22s!

Nah, they wouldn't do that. Bull****. If they could, they'd ban all
firearms. That's the next step.

Why do you think the Kimber is exempt. It has a detachable magazine.
Also Harry's silencers will have limited use in the future since
threaded barrels seem to be outlawed too.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5087/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22H.R.5087%22%5D%7D&r =1

We have heard this song before and the next step from the California
****s (boxer and feinstein) will be a ban on "sniper rifles" roughly
defined as any center fire rifle that can mount a scope.


Whoops! My misread. I guess only the revolvers stay. Everything else has
detachable magazine.


My 45 has a 6 rd mag.

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 18:59:04 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:47:25 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:13:39 -0500, John H.
wrote:

"The bill prohibits the ?sale, transfer, production, and importation?
of semi-automatic rifles and
pistols that can hold a detachable magazine, as well as semi-automatic
rifles with a magazine that
can hold more than 10 rounds."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ho...rticle/2650087

There goes my Mini-14, and the P226, but I get to keep the Kimber .45 and the .22s!

Nah, they wouldn't do that. Bull****. If they could, they'd ban all
firearms. That's the next step.

Why do you think the Kimber is exempt. It has a detachable magazine.
Also Harry's silencers will have limited use in the future since
threaded barrels seem to be outlawed too.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5087/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22H.R.5087%22%5D%7D&r =1

We have heard this song before and the next step from the California
****s (boxer and feinstein) will be a ban on "sniper rifles" roughly
defined as any center fire rifle that can mount a scope.


Whoops! My misread. I guess only the revolvers stay. Everything else has
detachable magazine.


My 45 has a 6 rd mag.

Makes no difference. If the mag is detachable, it would be prohibited.

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 18:59:04 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:47:25 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:13:39 -0500, John H.
wrote:

"The bill prohibits the ?sale, transfer, production, and importation?
of semi-automatic rifles and
pistols that can hold a detachable magazine, as well as semi-automatic
rifles with a magazine that
can hold more than 10 rounds."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ho...rticle/2650087

There goes my Mini-14, and the P226, but I get to keep the Kimber .45 and the .22s!

Nah, they wouldn't do that. Bull****. If they could, they'd ban all
firearms. That's the next step.

Why do you think the Kimber is exempt. It has a detachable magazine.
Also Harry's silencers will have limited use in the future since
threaded barrels seem to be outlawed too.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5087/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22H.R.5087%22%5D%7D&r =1

We have heard this song before and the next step from the California
****s (boxer and feinstein) will be a ban on "sniper rifles" roughly
defined as any center fire rifle that can mount a scope.


Whoops! My misread. I guess only the revolvers stay. Everything else has
detachable magazine.


My 45 has a 6 rd mag.

Makes no difference. If the mag is detachable, it would be prohibited.


It says more than 10 rds.

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 21:32:08 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 18:59:04 -0000 (UTC), Bill wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:47:25 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:13:39 -0500, John H.
wrote:

"The bill prohibits the ?sale, transfer, production, and importation?
of semi-automatic rifles and
pistols that can hold a detachable magazine, as well as semi-automatic
rifles with a magazine that
can hold more than 10 rounds."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ho...rticle/2650087

There goes my Mini-14, and the P226, but I get to keep the Kimber .45 and the .22s!

Nah, they wouldn't do that. Bull****. If they could, they'd ban all
firearms. That's the next step.

Why do you think the Kimber is exempt. It has a detachable magazine.
Also Harry's silencers will have limited use in the future since
threaded barrels seem to be outlawed too.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5087/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22H.R.5087%22%5D%7D&r =1

We have heard this song before and the next step from the California
****s (boxer and feinstein) will be a ban on "sniper rifles" roughly
defined as any center fire rifle that can mount a scope.


Whoops! My misread. I guess only the revolvers stay. Everything else has
detachable magazine.


My 45 has a 6 rd mag.

Makes no difference. If the mag is detachable, it would be prohibited.


It says more than 10 rds.

Read it again. "The bill prohibits the ?sale, transfer, production, and importation? of
semi-automatic rifles and pistols that can hold a detachable magazine,

as well as semi-automatic rifles with a magazine that can hold more than 10 rounds."

I suppose that means a 'nondetachable' magazine that can hold more than 10 rounds. Not sure what
that is, but maybe someone here can elucidate.

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 18:59:04 -0000 (UTC), Bill
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:47:25 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:13:39 -0500, John H.
wrote:

"The bill prohibits the ?sale, transfer, production, and importation?
of semi-automatic rifles and
pistols that can hold a detachable magazine, as well as semi-automatic
rifles with a magazine that
can hold more than 10 rounds."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ho...rticle/2650087

There goes my Mini-14, and the P226, but I get to keep the Kimber .45 and the .22s!

Nah, they wouldn't do that. Bull****. If they could, they'd ban all
firearms. That's the next step.

Why do you think the Kimber is exempt. It has a detachable magazine.
Also Harry's silencers will have limited use in the future since
threaded barrels seem to be outlawed too.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5087/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22H.R.5087%22%5D%7D&r =1

We have heard this song before and the next step from the California
****s (boxer and feinstein) will be a ban on "sniper rifles" roughly
defined as any center fire rifle that can mount a scope.


Whoops! My misread. I guess only the revolvers stay. Everything else has
detachable magazine.


My 45 has a 6 rd mag.
I bet there is someone out there making a 15-20 or more. At a certain
point it looks like a shoulder stock for people who want to shoot
themselves in the foot. ;-)

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:11:55 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:47:25 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:13:39 -0500, John H.
wrote:

"The bill prohibits the “sale, transfer, production, and importation� of semi-automatic rifles and
pistols that can hold a detachable magazine, as well as semi-automatic rifles with a magazine that
can hold more than 10 rounds."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ho...rticle/2650087

There goes my Mini-14, and the P226, but I get to keep the Kimber .45 and the .22s!

Nah, they wouldn't do that. Bull****. If they could, they'd ban all firearms. That's the next step.

Why do you think the Kimber is exempt. It has a detachable magazine.
Also Harry's silencers will have limited use in the future since
threaded barrels seem to be outlawed too.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5087/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22H.R.5087%22%5D%7D&r =1

We have heard this song before and the next step from the California
****s (boxer and feinstein) will be a ban on "sniper rifles" roughly
defined as any center fire rifle that can mount a scope.


Whoops! My misread. I guess only the revolvers stay. Everything else has detachable magazine.

This is all pretty silly anyway. I know we are always looking at the
last event but we quickly forget how much terror the DC sniper caused
and he could have done all of that with a 145 year old 45-70 Trap Door
Springfield.

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:18:21 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 12:11:55 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:47:25 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:13:39 -0500, John H.
wrote:

"The bill prohibits the “sale, transfer, production, and importation” of semi-automatic rifles and
pistols that can hold a detachable magazine, as well as semi-automatic rifles with a magazine that
can hold more than 10 rounds."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ho...rticle/2650087

There goes my Mini-14, and the P226, but I get to keep the Kimber .45 and the .22s!

Nah, they wouldn't do that. Bull****. If they could, they'd ban all firearms. That's the next step.

Why do you think the Kimber is exempt. It has a detachable magazine.
Also Harry's silencers will have limited use in the future since
threaded barrels seem to be outlawed too.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5087/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22H.R.5087%22%5D%7D&r =1

We have heard this song before and the next step from the California
****s (boxer and feinstein) will be a ban on "sniper rifles" roughly
defined as any center fire rifle that can mount a scope.


Whoops! My misread. I guess only the revolvers stay. Everything else has detachable magazine.

This is all pretty silly anyway. I know we are always looking at the
last event but we quickly forget how much terror the DC sniper caused
and he could have done all of that with a 145 year old 45-70 Trap Door
Springfield.

Yup, silly. But it shows that there are folks out there who want to do away with guns. And these
aren't just sliding down a slippery slope. These guys are trying to start an avalanche.