JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 10:55:35 -0800, "jps" wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
. ..

A Purple Heart may indicate courage, stupidity, or simply coincidence. The
fact
that one of your boys has one does not indicate he has a set of balls. I
keep
wondering when one of the candidates will say what he is going to do, as
opposed
to what he would have done.

Baseless rhetoric. Since you weren't there you cannot decrement the value
of the Purple Heart.
Yes, I was there. Yes, I was wounded. Yes, I was awarded a Purple Heart. No, not
baseless rhetoric.

So, that aside...

Do you mean when compared to "no nation building" and "no child left behind"
among several other campaign promises from which your man has done a 180?

I mean that I keep wondering what any of the Democratic candidates plan to do,
as opposed to what he (or she) would have done. Most of them can't even seem to
keep their, "I would have done's" straight.

It'll be done once we pick a candidate. What do you think Bush was saying
prior to getting the nod?

Do you pick candidates without knowing what they propose to do? Is it based on
who has the "best" anti-Bush rhetoric?


Frankly, aside from one or two "announced" Dems who are nothing more
than "fringe" candidates, I think any of the Dems would do a better job
than Bush, as would almost any of the Repubs who ran against him in the
primaries.

Bush is a nincompoop. It's as plain as the chimp smirk on his face.