| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Australia guns
I have an acquaintance who lives in California. She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns. Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution. Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing. The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. |
Australia guns
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:53:09 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
I have an acquaintance who lives in California. She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns. Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution. Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing. The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. Yup, the culture is different. Apparently they didn't get their fair share of deviants. |
Australia guns
Nor did the rest of the civilized world, Johnny!
Y'all seem to intentionally breed deviants. |
Australia guns
On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. |
Australia guns
On 2/25/2018 9:51 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. I am struggling trying to figure out how your comments relate to the post I made. It was about her very liberal views regarding guns, not technology or what I did for a living. Have you had your morning coffee yet? |
Australia guns
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 9:58:36 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/25/2018 9:51 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. I am struggling trying to figure out how your comments relate to the post I made. It was about her very liberal views regarding guns, not technology or what I did for a living. Have you had your morning coffee yet? He tries very hard to be an asshole. Thing is, he really doesn't have to try at all. The company I work for is an industry leader in our field, and it is acomputer/IP/software centric business. We were started in a small town in SC, and continue to be headquartered here. While large cities in the popular population centers certainly attract young professionals, the trend seems to be moving away from that model and more into a situation like ours. We have no problem attracting and keeping talent. |
Australia guns
On 2/25/2018 10:12 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 9:58:36 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/25/2018 9:51 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. I am struggling trying to figure out how your comments relate to the post I made. It was about her very liberal views regarding guns, not technology or what I did for a living. Have you had your morning coffee yet? He tries very hard to be an asshole. Thing is, he really doesn't have to try at all. The company I work for is an industry leader in our field, and it is acomputer/IP/software centric business. We were started in a small town in SC, and continue to be headquartered here. While large cities in the popular population centers certainly attract young professionals, the trend seems to be moving away from that model and more into a situation like ours. We have no problem attracting and keeping talent. There seems to be a remaining myth that "high tech" industries only exist in the areas Harry mentioned. Back in the 50's and 60's it was probably so but "high tech" has expanded or sprung up virtually everwhere in the USA. Even those states known mostly as being agricultural in nature have their share of "high tech" companies. Harry is wrong. I could have just as easily set up shop back in 1989 in South Carolina or elsewhere. Our largest domestic competitor was located in Texas and the largest international competitor was located in Germany. I just happened to live in MA and had kids in school. |
Australia guns
On 2/25/18 9:58 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/25/2018 9:51 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. I am struggling trying to figure out how your comments relate to the post I made.* It was about her very liberal views regarding guns, not technology or what I did for a living. Have you had your morning coffee yet? You have nothing but disdain for what you view as "liberal politics," yet it is liberalism that helped create the atmosphere in the state in which your business thrived. You must be a big fan of today's conservatism, as embodied by the GOP, CPAC, and Donald Trump, eh? |
Australia guns
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:12:14 -0800 (PST), Its Me
wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 9:58:36 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/25/2018 9:51 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. I am struggling trying to figure out how your comments relate to the post I made. It was about her very liberal views regarding guns, not technology or what I did for a living. Have you had your morning coffee yet? He tries very hard to be an asshole. Thing is, he really doesn't have to try at all. The company I work for is an industry leader in our field, and it is acomputer/IP/software centric business. We were started in a small town in SC, and continue to be headquartered here. While large cities in the popular population centers certainly attract young professionals, the trend seems to be moving away from that model and more into a situation like ours. We have no problem attracting and keeping talent. === 'Airree has obviously never heard of Research Triangle Park, or his prejudices against the south don't allow him to acknowledge it. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com |
Australia guns
|
Australia guns
|
Australia guns
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 10:45:50 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/25/18 9:58 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/25/2018 9:51 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. I am struggling trying to figure out how your comments relate to the post I made.* It was about her very liberal views regarding guns, not technology or what I did for a living. Have you had your morning coffee yet? You have nothing but disdain for what you view as "liberal politics," yet it is liberalism that helped create the atmosphere in the state in which your business thrived. You must be a big fan of today's conservatism, as embodied by the GOP, CPAC, and Donald Trump, eh? His post had nothing to do with politics, and displayed none of the 'disdain' you mention. You try too hard to find something to argue about. Makes you look stupid. |
Australia guns
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 09:03:07 -0500, John H.
wrote: On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:53:09 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California. She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns. Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution. Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing. The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. Yup, the culture is different. Apparently they didn't get their fair share of deviants. I think they just do a better job of weeding the deviants out. It is certainly a different culture tho,. |
Australia guns
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 09:58:31 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 2/25/2018 9:51 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. I am struggling trying to figure out how your comments relate to the post I made. It was about her very liberal views regarding guns, not technology or what I did for a living. Have you had your morning coffee yet? Harry never misses the opportunity to **** on people who don't live in the coastal states. I Forget, which ivy league college did he go to? Oh yeah, it was goober tech in a place best known for corn. |
Australia guns
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 10:50:10 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. I didn't see North Carolina there. Wayne is right you missed Triangle Park. You also seem to ignore that Bill Gates bought the software that was the basis for Microsoft from a guy in New Mexico. I agree these computer people clustered around Silicon Valley but that was largely because the government shoveled massive amounts of DoD and NASA contract money there, thanks to the power of having more congressional reps but it has nothing to do with gun control. It has to do with where the fabs were. |
Australia guns
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:51:52 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. Illinois, one of the bluest states of them all would have loved to have had Richards company so they could suck him dry of taxes and still be broke with nothing to show for it. |
Australia guns
|
Australia guns
On 2/25/2018 12:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:51:52 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. Illinois, one of the bluest states of them all would have loved to have had Richards company so they could suck him dry of taxes and still be broke with nothing to show for it. Illinois has you, an obvious failure of public education. 😀 Wow. Harry sure woke up this morning with a hair across his ass. Either that or his 'roids are acting up. |
Australia guns
On 25 Feb 2018 17:56:46 GMT, Keyser Soze wrote:
Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:51:52 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. Illinois, one of the bluest states of them all would have loved to have had Richards company so they could suck him dry of taxes and still be broke with nothing to show for it. Illinois has you, an obvious failure of public education. ? Tim manages his own business - successfully. Wonder who would garner more respect in polite company, you or Tim. |
Australia guns
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 13:35:12 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: aven't heard "Shockley" or "Shockley Diode" in many years. :-) Shockley's politics were a little too shocking for liberals in the US. |
Australia guns
|
Australia guns
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 12:24:43 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/25/2018 12:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:51:52 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. Illinois, one of the bluest states of them all would have loved to have had Richards company so they could suck him dry of taxes and still be broke with nothing to show for it. Illinois has you, an obvious failure of public education. 😀 Wow. Harry sure woke up this morning with a hair across his ass. Either that or his 'roids are acting up. Or both. Im sure an ingrown hair through a 'roid can be very painful and destroy mental stability. but for him this is normal |
Australia guns
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 12:24:43 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/25/2018 12:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:51:52 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. Illinois, one of the bluest states of them all would have loved to have had Richards company so they could suck him dry of taxes and still be broke with nothing to show for it. Illinois has you, an obvious failure of public education. 😀 Wow. Harry sure woke up this morning with a hair across his ass. Either that or his 'roids are acting up. Richard, it's interesting how he wrote that and hid it from me. I'd not known it was there till you replied to it... What a joke... |
Australia guns
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 11:32:37 AM UTC-5, wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 09:58:31 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/25/2018 9:51 AM, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. I am struggling trying to figure out how your comments relate to the post I made. It was about her very liberal views regarding guns, not technology or what I did for a living. Have you had your morning coffee yet? Harry never misses the opportunity to **** on people who don't live in the coastal states. I Forget, which ivy league college did he go to? Oh yeah, it was goober tech in a place best known for corn. LOL!!! That was priceless. |
Australia guns
On 2/25/18 4:50 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 12:24:43 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/25/2018 12:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:51:52 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. Illinois, one of the bluest states of them all would have loved to have had Richards company so they could suck him dry of taxes and still be broke with nothing to show for it. Illinois has you, an obvious failure of public education. 😀 Wow. Harry sure woke up this morning with a hair across his ass. Either that or his 'roids are acting up. Richard, it's interesting how he wrote that and hid it from me. I'd not known it was there till you replied to it... What a joke... What are you imbibing? I know of no way to "hide" a post of mine from someone else reading usenet groups. Maybe it isn't a joke that education failed you, or maybe this communication medium is just too complex for you |
Australia guns
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/25/18 4:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 12:24:43 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/25/2018 12:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:51:52 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. Illinois, one of the bluest states of them all would have loved to have had Richards company so they could suck him dry of taxes and still be broke with nothing to show for it. Illinois has you, an obvious failure of public education. 😀 Wow. Harry sure woke up this morning with a hair across his ass. Either that or his 'roids are acting up. Richard, it's interesting how he wrote that and hid it from me. I'd not known it was there till you replied to it... What a joke... What are you imbibing? I know of no way to "hide" a post of mine from someone else reading usenet groups. Maybe it isn't a joke that education failed you, or maybe this communication medium is just too complex for you His education failed him? How? He seems to have a successful business, never declared bankruptcy to my knowledge. Can read and write. |
Australia guns
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 7:28:31 PM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 2/25/18 4:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 12:24:43 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/25/2018 12:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:51:52 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. Illinois, one of the bluest states of them all would have loved to have had Richards company so they could suck him dry of taxes and still be broke with nothing to show for it. Illinois has you, an obvious failure of public education. 😀 Wow. Harry sure woke up this morning with a hair across his ass. Either that or his 'roids are acting up. Richard, it's interesting how he wrote that and hid it from me. I'd not known it was there till you replied to it... What a joke... What are you imbibing? I know of no way to "hide" a post of mine from someone else reading usenet groups. Maybe it isn't a joke that education failed you, or maybe this communication medium is just too complex for you Harry, go to google groups and see if your snide little snippet actually shows up there, that is unless Richard posted it (which he did) it obviously won't appear. Of course my public education failed me. I live in down state Illinois which is below Chicago, and Chicago is also below Detroit. You said Liberals started public education? Well, there's your socialist trickle down for you Harry. |
Australia guns
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 20:28:28 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote: What are you imbibing? I know of no way to "hide" a post of mine from someone else reading usenet groups. Your lack of computer savvy is showing now. If I don't want Tim or any other Google Groups guy to see my post, I just turn on the "no archive" bit. I guess you were not paying attention when that was discussed here. |
Australia guns
Tim wrote:
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 7:28:31 PM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 4:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 12:24:43 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/25/2018 12:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:51:52 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. Illinois, one of the bluest states of them all would have loved to have had Richards company so they could suck him dry of taxes and still be broke with nothing to show for it. Illinois has you, an obvious failure of public education. 😀 Wow. Harry sure woke up this morning with a hair across his ass. Either that or his 'roids are acting up. Richard, it's interesting how he wrote that and hid it from me. I'd not known it was there till you replied to it... What a joke... What are you imbibing? I know of no way to "hide" a post of mine from someone else reading usenet groups. Maybe it isn't a joke that education failed you, or maybe this communication medium is just too complex for you Harry, go to google groups and see if your snide little snippet actually shows up there, that is unless Richard posted it (which he did) it obviously won't appear. Of course my public education failed me. I live in down state Illinois which is below Chicago, and Chicago is also below Detroit. You said Liberals started public education? Well, there's your socialist trickle down for you Harry. I don’t use google groups. It sucks. I suspect therein lies your problem with my post. -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. |
Australia guns
wrote:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 20:28:28 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: What are you imbibing? I know of no way to "hide" a post of mine from someone else reading usenet groups. Your lack of computer savvy is showing now. If I don't want Tim or any other Google Groups guy to see my post, I just turn on the "no archive" bit. I guess you were not paying attention when that was discussed here. I don’t pay any attention to the “standards” for google groups. -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. |
Australia guns
Wrote in message:
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 20:28:28 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: What are you imbibing? I know of no way to "hide" a post of mine from someone else reading usenet groups. Your lack of computer savvy is showing now. If I don't want Tim or any other Google Groups guy to see my post, I just turn on the "no archive" bit. I guess you were not paying attention when that was discussed here. It was Fat Harries little pumpkin in Halifax who first encountered that problem and claimed he didn't see my posts because I had him filtered. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Australia guns
Wait a minute, Justine. It was y'all who said you had me filtered.
Are y'all now admitting you were a baldfaced liar and that you're full of ****? |
Australia guns
On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 21:38:22 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: wrote: On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 20:28:28 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote: What are you imbibing? I know of no way to "hide" a post of mine from someone else reading usenet groups. Your lack of computer savvy is showing now. If I don't want Tim or any other Google Groups guy to see my post, I just turn on the "no archive" bit. I guess you were not paying attention when that was discussed here. I don’t pay any attention to the “standards” for google groups. Or much else technical. Google Groups is archival, by it's very nature, like anything Google ever sniffs. They do respect the no archive bit, although it wasn't always so. The result is they know they can't forget so they don't admit to reading it at all. (I bet they still mine the data). |
Australia guns
True North Wrote in message:
Wait a minute, Justine. It was y'all who said you had me filtered. Are y'all now admitting you were a baldfaced liar and that you're full of ****? I may have had you filtered but that wasn't why you couldnt see my posts. It appears that you still don't get it. Dummy. -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Australia guns
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:38:24 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 7:28:31 PM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 4:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 12:24:43 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/25/2018 12:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:51:52 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. Illinois, one of the bluest states of them all would have loved to have had Richards company so they could suck him dry of taxes and still be broke with nothing to show for it. Illinois has you, an obvious failure of public education. 😀 Wow. Harry sure woke up this morning with a hair across his ass. Either that or his 'roids are acting up. Richard, it's interesting how he wrote that and hid it from me. I'd not known it was there till you replied to it... What a joke... What are you imbibing? I know of no way to "hide" a post of mine from someone else reading usenet groups. Maybe it isn't a joke that education failed you, or maybe this communication medium is just too complex for you Harry, go to google groups and see if your snide little snippet actually shows up there, that is unless Richard posted it (which he did) it obviously won't appear. Of course my public education failed me. I live in down state Illinois which is below Chicago, and Chicago is also below Detroit. You said Liberals started public education? Well, there's your socialist trickle down for you Harry. I don’t use google groups. It sucks. I suspect therein lies your problem with my post. -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. Odd, first you blame a failure on my public education which you say was founded by liberals, then you blame google groups which you say you don't pay attention to. wow... |
Australia guns
On 2/26/18 4:18 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:38:24 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote: Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 7:28:31 PM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 4:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 12:24:43 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/25/2018 12:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:51:52 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California.* She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns.* Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the* mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution.* Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing.* The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. Illinois, one of the bluest states of them all would have loved to have had Richards company so they could suck him dry of taxes and still be broke with nothing to show for it. Illinois has you, an obvious failure of public education. 😀 Wow. Harry sure woke up this morning with a hair across his ass. Either that or his 'roids are acting up. Richard, it's interesting how he wrote that and hid it from me. I'd not known it was there till you replied to it... What a joke... What are you imbibing? I know of no way to "hide" a post of mine from someone else reading usenet groups. Maybe it isn't a joke that education failed you, or maybe this communication medium is just too complex for you Harry, go to google groups and see if your snide little snippet actually shows up there, that is unless Richard posted it (which he did) it obviously won't appear. Of course my public education failed me. I live in down state Illinois which is below Chicago, and Chicago is also below Detroit. You said Liberals started public education? Well, there's your socialist trickle down for you Harry. I don’t use google groups. It sucks. I suspect therein lies your problem with my post. -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. Odd, first you blame a failure on my public education which you say was founded by liberals, then you blame google groups which you say you don't pay attention to. wow... It's probably some of both. Google Groups as a usenet posting facility pretty much sucks. That has been reported here and many other places any number of times. It's been pointed out to you and to Don, who also uses Google Groups. There are many annoying issues with it. I will not get into them here. If you couldn't find a particular post of mine, it isn't likely the problem is with my usenet client. I've been using the same one for decades and I don't change the settings. I also haven't changed the usenet client I use on my cell or my iPad. It is correct that I do not use Google Groups, and it is also true I have no interest in using it. I will be delighted, however, to point out on occasion the "confusion" that results from your posting via Google Groups. The most common problem is lack of context, though there are formatting issues, too. |
Australia guns
|
Australia guns
Tim Wrote in message:
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:38:24 PM UTC-6, Keyser Sze wrote: Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 7:28:31 PM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 4:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 12:24:43 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/25/2018 12:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:51:52 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California. She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns. Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution. Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing. The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. Illinois, one of the bluest states of them all would have loved to have had Richards company so they could suck him dry of taxes and still be broke with nothing to show for it. Illinois has you, an obvious failure of public education. ?? Wow. Harry sure woke up this morning with a hair across his ass. Either that or his 'roids are acting up. Richard, it's interesting how he wrote that and hid it from me. I'd not known it was there till you replied to it... What a joke... What are you imbibing? I know of no way to "hide" a post of mine from someone else reading usenet groups. Maybe it isn't a joke that education failed you, or maybe this communication medium is just too complex for you Harry, go to google groups and see if your snide little snippet actually shows up there, that is unless Richard posted it (which he did) it obviously won't appear. Of course my public education failed me. I live in down state Illinois which is below Chicago, and Chicago is also below Detroit. You said Liberals started public education? Well, there's your socialist trickle down for you Harry. I don?t use google groups. It sucks. I suspect therein lies your problem with my post. -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. Odd, first you blame a failure on my public education which you say was founded by liberals, then you blame google groups which you say you don't pay attention to. wow... The more Fat Harry writes less bull**** Fat Harry keeps bottled up. Do you suppose his therapist is making him do it? -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Australia guns
Keyser Soze Wrote in message:
On 2/26/18 4:18 AM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:38:24 PM UTC-6, Keyser Sze wrote: Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 7:28:31 PM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 4:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 12:24:43 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/25/2018 12:56 PM, Keyser Soze wrote: Tim wrote: On Sunday, February 25, 2018 at 8:51:52 AM UTC-6, Keyser Soze wrote: On 2/25/18 7:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: I have an acquaintance who lives in California. She's *very* liberal in her views which is to be expected, I guess. She has recently announced that after living in the USA for the last 60+ years, she and her husband are moving to Australia next month to get away from the USA's "crazy" obsession with guns. Like other liberals, she has often advocated that the USA adopt the 1997 policy of a buy back program following the mass shooting in Port Arthur, Australia. She ignores some real data though. First, Australia does not have anything like a 2nd Amendment in it's constitution. Gun rights are controlled by the "states" rather than the federal government. Secondly, there are more privately owned firearms in Australia today than there were before 1996. The million guns destroyed after Port Arthur have been replaced with 1,026,000 new ones. But, I agree with her about one thing. The culture is different there. Guns are primarily used for hunting and there's no obsession with copies of military style semi-automatics. "Very liberal." Love it. It is the "liberal states" where the atmosphere is most conducive to innovation technology. Didn't you make your fortune via innovation technology? Just about every assessment I've seen says that the leading technology states in terms of innovation technology and percentages of workers employed in innovation technology are Massachusetts, California, New York, and Connecticut. You think there is a connection between liberal politics and innovation technology? You think SpaceX is headquartered in California by accident? I wonder how successful you might have been, business technology wise, had you started up when you did in Mississippi, South Carolina, or Florida. Illinois, one of the bluest states of them all would have loved to have had Richards company so they could suck him dry of taxes and still be broke with nothing to show for it. Illinois has you, an obvious failure of public education. ?? Wow. Harry sure woke up this morning with a hair across his ass. Either that or his 'roids are acting up. Richard, it's interesting how he wrote that and hid it from me. I'd not known it was there till you replied to it... What a joke... What are you imbibing? I know of no way to "hide" a post of mine from someone else reading usenet groups. Maybe it isn't a joke that education failed you, or maybe this communication medium is just too complex for you Harry, go to google groups and see if your snide little snippet actually shows up there, that is unless Richard posted it (which he did) it obviously won't appear. Of course my public education failed me. I live in down state Illinois which is below Chicago, and Chicago is also below Detroit. You said Liberals started public education? Well, there's your socialist trickle down for you Harry. I don?t use google groups. It sucks. I suspect therein lies your problem with my post. -- Posted with my iPhone 8+. Odd, first you blame a failure on my public education which you say was founded by liberals, then you blame google groups which you say you don't pay attention to. wow... It's probably some of both. Google Groups as a usenet posting facility pretty much sucks. That has been reported here and many other places any number of times. It's been pointed out to you and to Don, who also uses Google Groups. There are many annoying issues with it. I will not get into them here. If you couldn't find a particular post of mine, it isn't likely the problem is with my usenet client. I've been using the same one for decades and I don't change the settings. I also haven't changed the usenet client I use on my cell or my iPad. It is correct that I do not use Google Groups, and it is also true I have no interest in using it. I will be delighted, however, to point out on occasion the "confusion" that results from your posting via Google Groups. The most common problem is lack of context, though there are formatting issues, too. YOU HEAR THAT, LITTLE DONNIE? -- x ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:14 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com